The current climate of demographic race mixing is effectively a reversed Holocaust,
Let me explain:
Instead of simply killing off the undesirable populace like Hitler advocated in the 1940s in Nazi ruled Germany and its conquered dominions. The new form of holocaust, or cultural genocide – is to overwhelmingly collide one culturally distinct people with another in the hopes of weakening the presiding cultural dominance of the undesirable populace.
This eliminates the need for conquest to subdue a state to the will of the controlling power and its agenda, instead by sneaking in backdoor soft-methods of diplomacy, the people will unknowingly accept their cultural values, ways and political priorities being gradually overridden by the means of being made a minority in their own country.
The EU is tacitly empowered enough to enact this subterfuge, undemocratically enabling 5 Presidents to call the shots on matters of borders and migrants, and galvanizing enough influence to threaten any state that fails to comply i.e. Hungary, Greece etc.
The EU wants us to remain part of a club that bullies and intimidates its members.
Threatens them with isolation and punishment if they leave
Threatens to bankrupt them if they do not keep to austerity and accept their loans to pay off richer countries Banks.
Gives fiscal favours to their members that support them (France)
Threaten them with Fines if they do not do what they are told (Hungary,Poland and the UK)
Leave some of their weaker members to go to the wall (Greece) whilst protecting the stronger ones (Germany and France).
Preside over huge unemployment in your southern member states.
This migrant abuse is being seen widely under the unilateral (one-sided) EU, a deregulated unit where sovereign nations; with their cultures, values and borders are all being actively denigrated to make way for the mass importation of a preferred group of people that hold values that are vastly different, and preferred by the twisted arbiters of this demographic manipulation; such as state-empowering socialism, support for the consolidation of the EU, and lowering standards of the middle & working class to benefit the rich.
The more socialist inclined migrants you import the more you have a founded base of the population that will vote for your agenda. It’s mob rule in action, an exploitation of the fallacious majority-rule democracy that will ignore civil constitutional, republican values, and furthers the interests of the EU and globalists, who hope to get rid of the sacrosanct, freedom oriented Western ways. Which is not remotely comparable to the regressive Eastern world (where most of the migrants are incidentally being brought in from, most of which are not even refugees).
The deregulated Schengen zone is incentivising migration, making vast swathes cross oceans, it’s definitely not war that is the main cause of this because migrants are coming from many more non war-torn states than are.
Instead of raising the cultural standards of Africa and Mexico, the Bolsheviks are lowering the cultural (and living)
standards in the West to that of the 3rd World.
Patriotism and national self interest is the new racism. Only Global-Socialism need apply.
– Mark Quon
Campaign funded guilt, i.e.’Nazi guilt’ in Germany for example, has whittled down resistance to accepting mass migration; along with the phony ‘white privilege’ arguments, black lives matter (how about all lives matter?), the dead refugee guilt-tripping broadcasts on mainstream media outlets, political correctness including the fear of being called a racist (deters talking about migration), and the pushing of the failed multiculturalism programme, which wrongly suggests that a mixed culture society will be automatically concordant.
Is it all starting to make sense now?
We’ve been made to focus so much on not racially glorifying our own kin, that we have let that take precedence over the protection of our highly successful, constitutional values and culture, something sorely lacking in the medieval third world.
We have been forced to focus so much on not being racist towards migrants that we have utterly forgotten about the sheer cultural differences that are inherent between different groups of people.
We have forgotten, in all our sickeningly, overly-liberal oneness, that the current mass-migration programme is not championing liberal, western values, but instilling regressive eastern values in-mass, and changing the political face of Europe altogether.
We have ignored calls for integration, assuming that this is somehow patronizingly superficial to expect of newcomers to Western countries (backed by the insipid white guilt campaigns), we have pinned our disregard for extreme, socialistic ideologies to instead debating the colour of the skin, how unintegrated diversity is somehow enriching, or whether Islamic migrants get to wear their Hijab/Burqa headdress or not.
Decadence is the natural result of all this, as articulated in the outlawed book ‘Fall of Empires’:
Decadence is marked by:
Defensiveness
Pessimism
Materialism
Frivolity
An influx of foreigners
The Welfare State
A weakening of religion.
The European Union (EU), having come into fruition in the early 70s as a trade bloc/customs union in the face of the ever hulking USSR, has now become evermore redundant in modern times, where openness presently discards insularity and the thaw of the Cold War has given rise to a more amicable, diplomatic global stage (not an era where shut-in trade blocs seemed like the future). The EU is thus, no longer bearing the relevancy as a defensive bulwark of economic fortification that it once was.
Unfortunately, the EU has outgrown its initial purpose of just smoothing trade barriers, it is now attributing unwarranted power to the little known, unelected5 presidents of the EU institutions (that I reckon you cannot name) seated in the Brussels complex, and undemocratically granting these quango figureheads substantially unchallenged political sway over the 28 member states that comprise the union. i.e. holding influential authority over upwards of 50% of UK laws by means of EU regulations.
“Free from EU rules and regulations, Britain could reinvent itself as a Singapore-style supercharged economy.” (Upon Brexit)
So let’s evaluate the pros and cons of remaining or seceding from a Union that has rapidly evolved in recent times without nearly enough audition.
The Pros/Cons of staying in the EU
Pros: Trade and inter-connectivity inside Europe: trade between the member states is admittedly somewhat smoother, the EU delivers in the initial goal of achieving this. The EU is a single market in which no tariffs are imposed on imports and exports between member states. “More than 50 percent of our exports go to EU countries” this is essentially modeled at forgetting individual states, you will see this fluidity becoming so much so that individual states become unrecognizable by approximately 2060, in a Babel-esque move for an absolutist European singularity, distinct cultural ties must be liquidated. To some this is progressive as provides unity in the aftermath of two world wars, however other sources have suggested that it is solely in the interest of certain powers to combat the rise of a Russia-China unification (China is a 800 million hard-working person powerhouse!) by boosting Europe as a Bloc of the front-line against the rising Eastern world, reflected in the exclusion of both Russia and China in EU trade negotiations. To me it seems to be a dichotomy making effort that will only further the rift between the East and the West, and exacerbate the chances of a third world war being initiated.
Cons: Trade and inter-connectivity inside Europe: The EU locks member states into being answerable to the decisions of the presidents of the EU commission at Brussels for the majority of our trade agreements, most of which are heavily regulated and strictly forbid us branching out on our own basis to trade with China, Russia, or India for example (the stat of 50% of exports going to the EU is very variable, for example these exports could go to world markets if we left the EU, or would remain going to Europe, just not under the EU.) The EU solely embraces the concept that will fuse all member states under one unified roof; the need for sovereign parliaments will eventually be wiped away, the EU naturally does not give us free reign over our own trade because honouring individual states is not its ultimate aim or agenda: one massive state ruled by unaccountable, unelected ministers is! Doesn’t seem sensible to me, as most problems of the world have nearly always arisen from big government.
The EU is rather akin to the USSR both in structure and practice, and is poised to soon enough become waywardly socialist by importing socialist leaning people en masse!
By 2020 all EU member states must adopt the Euro;including Great Britain. Forget the rhetoric that suggests we retain the pound.
Further political centralization is expected to be drawn into Brussels once the UK Referendum is over.
Goldman Sachs and big banks love the EU as it gives them extended control over the economies of Europe via the incredibly centralized Brussels, a single market is much easier to dominate and influence. Check Here for more on that.
Kalashnikovs and terrorist armaments, not to mention drugs and contraband are easily getting around Europe with the fallible Schengen area, worsening crime and enabling heightened deployability of terrorist operations akin to the recent Brussels bombings.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, who has come out in favour of Brexit, says we are leaving the “door open” to terrorist attacks by remaining in the EU. “This open border does not allow us to check and control people.”
Pros: Borderless Migration: getting around Europe is made easy, the Schengen area permits free movement of people and their labour, but usually at the cost of depriving weaker countries and reinforcing already economically strong states. The trade-in for this is migrants from within Europe can greatly boost economies and labour-forces, but at the cost of the average wage declining in the host nation. This benefits CEOs mainly, who will inevitably make more money with a more grateful, low-salary workforce. The legislation of the Working Time Directive seems to cover this up, however there is a huge incentive for CEOs to back staying in based on cheaper labour from free movement within the EU that favours low pay workers most (that they want), not the middle-class natives and SME business owners, who are already settled comfortably.
Case Study: Migrant workers are simply leaving a crumbling Spanish economy and coming to the UK, pushing down our wages, increasing job and property contest here, and crippling the Spanish yet further. it is this economic centralization and the favouring of the flagship states in Europe that is doing an injustice to the weaker states in Europe.
Without restrictions on who comes here (The UK), the poorer provider countries lose population and their workers (both skilled and unskilled) people flood into richer countries without much audition. There is no limitation. Yet ironically there is discriminant limitation on those who can come here from outside the EU, it all screams a basket case, single population state that is being slowly implemented.
Case Study: Turkey is set to be fast-tracked to join the EU, using its efforts at siphoning migrant flow through its borders as a reason for its accelerated inclusion. This will be opening the gates to 75 million Turks to have free travel across the board, putting more stress on the UK and other EU flagship states. David Cameron has lied concerning this issue claiming it would take ‘decades’ for the Turks to get in, but that disregards the reality the EU parliament can override legal processes and the general consensus favours Turkey getting in early.
8% of Turks are ISIS sympathizers! That’s roughly around 6000,000 people.
Defence minister Penny Mordaunt said the migrant crisis would hasten talks over Turkey’s EU bid and the UK was powerless to stop it.
Cons: Borderless Migration: We have little control over who comes into the country, because the EU has overextended itself so much, and independent states can no longer act independently with their own borders. Illegal migrants from outside the EU are quite easily physically gaining access by crossing narrow straits and passing into the continent without scrutiny via Schengen, gaining visas with less and less requirements. These migrants often have no interest in benefiting the EU in many cases, flocking to the welfare states such as the UK or Germany for the freebie financial incentives and establishing themselves, utterly unconcerned with meaningfully integrating themselves; giving way to ethnic enclaves and the transformation of the entire political landscape, it is a replacement, not an integration.
The social impacts are severe, Islamic people now form majorities in a few European capitals, and ethnic enclaves are on the rise. This is not about race, because massed, unlimited migration shifts the entire political and social structure of a country to accommodate eastern principles, legal standpoints such as the oppressive Shariah law are now being encouraged and enabled due to the largely Islamic, unintegrated majority populaces voting in leaders that favour Islamic, non-western ideologies over progressive, western ones. It’s a natural consequence of mass-migration, and a lack of successful migrant integration.
The numbers don’t lie on estimated European Union Migration to the UK, but David Cameron has lied concerning Migration and its limitation numerous times, especially regarding his claims to limit migration to the tens of thousands during his term, this has not happened as shown above, EU Freedom of movement in itself actually prohibits it!
Cameron claims in the video below that he’s using standards for the citizenship of migrants to curb overall migration, yet migrant unemployment is at 70% or at least high, with them not being deported despite Cameron claiming that deportation would be imposed on unemployed, welfare sapping migrants. Again, he lies, and he’s very good at lying. Migration is not going to be reduced, do not kid yourself. Cameron wants to appease the voter to get his way now, then just continue this devastating trend unhindered after the referendum.
Support for Socialist parties, and the favouring of big government with these migrants gaining the majority vote perpetuates the issue further. An inside-out transformation of political opinion is occurring, the migrant crisis is effectively a political Trojan Horse for converting public opinion which favours growing the EU further. The longer the EU is intact, the more majoritarian democracy is bent to the unelected EU kingpins by mass importing the opinion they want.
Social Impacts, conversion/replacement of western culture to regressive eastern ways due to sheer lack of integration. ‘White Flight‘, the rise of segregationist groups such as Britain First, and the election of Muslim London Mayor Sadiq Khan prove that there is an unaddressed, growing cultural divergence in the UK.
Welfare, the big incentive for migrants coming in their million hordes.The goal of the EU is to bring about an increasingly socialist climate in its member states, that’s why it is ever increasingly comparable to the Soviet Union and its’ pet states. Migrants, generally poorer, are the only demographic that are going to overwhelmingly accept this vision.
Stress on services and housing from dramatic migration could push the NHS to collapse & go private, and national housing prices to skyrocket considerably, this level of migration is simply unsustainable.
Stress on jobs from migration will drive down our wages, and generate more competition, making the entire climate more difficult for everyone financially, and with their employability – CEOs love the large pool of candidates, but the common people just suffer as a result.
Migrants favour their own gain (welfare state) and do not prioritize liberties and constitutional values nearly as much as the western people do (The EU has no active constitution suppressing authoritarianism or enforcing the democratic rights of the people) largely ignored in mainstream debates about the EU. They (Migrants) are used as voting fodder to bolster socialism, and consolidating larger, more controlling governmental entities (Favours EU). And of course, to ultimately forget the western culture that had originally kindled democracy, liberty, progressive Christian values, and the vital, ever-important constitutional documents such as the Magna Carta that ensure democratic liberties remain intact. The EU is the utter antithesis of this and uses penchant bribes; i.e. cheaper landline costs and cheaper flights to win over less politically knowledgeable people to vote for it!
Pros: Favours Poorer Migrants & Refugees: to them, this is positive as it gives these people from greatly poorer states an opportunity to come and work in 1st world welfare states such as the UK, Sweden and Germany. They get accommodated, they get pension guarantees, they get housing – the EU is grooming them and enticing them, and they do not care about their impact on the natives, the notion of Kafirs (non-believers) is prominent throughout Islamic culture (A predominant faith of migrants), a discriminatory ideology in the Qu’ran that orders Islamic people to disdain all non-believers.
Does this seem conducive to overall successful integration to you? …
The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse.
Here are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.
“Multiculturalism”: It has been argued by many that multiculturalism has ‘enriched’ European cultures; in reality it does not work particularly well and actually causes social divides. It is positive for those of foreign backgrounds as the EU is pushing for prioritizing migrants settlers over natives, introducing quotas providing pole-position for migrants in attaining employment. What it does do is import a more amicable workforce for big companies and bring in people grateful to work for pennies, people who will vote in bigger government, people who will favour the EU.
Cons: Favours Poor Migrants & Refugees: most of these alleged ‘refugees’ – a term that has been used in conjunction with guilt-tripping media imagery to push the idea that we must accept mass migration is actually misleading. Most migrants are not refugees from Syria, many gain access to Europe in the guise of these refugees, but are only really interested in the ‘good life’ of welfare & benefits. This ‘refugee’ sham is used by the EU commissioners as an excuse to force EU states to accept these ‘refugees’ in massive, unlimited numbers out of liberal-backed sympathy, an emotional attachment that has silenced voices of reason on many platforms with dismissive buzz words like ‘racist’ that discourage in-depth debate.
Remainers argue constantly that we need this level of migration to fill in labour gaps and assure the receipt of skilled workers from abroad, however let us not forget that we can easily drop the current unhindered migration system that does not base itself on meritocratic bases, but destructively allows anyone free access – to a better, alternative system that is far more efficient & selective of people that are useful to our economy and have intentions beyond simply settling for the welfare benefits here. i.e. the Australian migration system which is points based and is nondiscriminatory.
Opposing view: The UK already has a points-based system for non-EU migrants and it is not clear why inventing a different system – with less flexibility – would be a good idea. – BBC ‘Reality Check’
Leave EU Response: Yes, we have a points system for non-EU migrants, however the whole Leave argument concerns introducing this points based system for all migrants everywhere, and not being discriminatory by reserving this points system to just migrants that are outside the EU, that is nonsensical.
The EU simply intends to encourage mass-immigration by keeping the union exempt of points-based migration policies. This emphasizes mass-migratory patterns that are unkempt and radical in their demeanor and favour the inducement of an excess of lower class workers for top flight corporations to absorb, it also accelerates the centralization of the EU as these migrants overwhelmingly tend to vote in bigger government.
The Membership Fee
The fee for membership is stated as:
The gross contribution in 2015 was £17.8bn but the UK rebate was worth £4.9bn – BBC
This means it cost us £12.9 billion/£350m a week last year to be a member of the EU club, money that could go towards our own national ambitions, and could have utterly eliminated the austerity measures imposed in recent years for example.
A remain argument suggests that:
After Brexit, the UK would still have to contribute to the EU budget to retain access to the single market.
While this is true, it would cost less than the current fees, and with Brexit we will have the freedom to trade with other global trade blocs, not just the EU (which is actually the slowest growing trade bloc in the world), the EU has been compared to a dead corpse that we have shackled ourselves to.
There is also a strong argument for the EU collapsing if we exit, other countries have suggested an interest in escaping and following the UK out of the door if Brexit follows through. This renders the misguided analogy of us being ‘outsiders’ void and null, as we can still trade with the EU post-Brexit and we regain our own independence in regards to negotiating trade deals with proven-to-be more prosperous trade blocs, it’s a win for the UK and its interests.
The International Relations Argument
Remainers have argued that we will somehow be cut afloat upon Brexit and be left to fend for ourselves…
It is this inwards, fear-mongering, herd-mentality, caricatured point of view that has garnered the wide support from swathes of the politically apathetic. As the 5th largest economy in the world, a huge global market for all trade blocs, the financial gateway of the world (City of London), and a wholly competent negotiator at the global table of diplomatic affairs, the UK absolutely stands a solid chance of breaking away from a Union that treats us as a mere appendage in its absurd, uncanny ambitions for a single state of Europe, and eventually a world government.
The reality is that the bureaucratic EU folk needs us more than we need them. It’s a classic gesture that is wholly applicable here, we are a key driving force in the EU’s success. The unelected few in Brussels rely largely on our funding, our influence, our active involvement in their failing project. Without us, the chance of the EU remaining intact is narrow, but remainers would love to perpetuate the ill-informed notion that the EU will somehow sustain itself after our departure, (it’s already very unstable) – and that we’re the ones that will fall afoul of some fabricated imaginary benefit if we do leave.
We’re joining the rest of the world
But it’s not that we’re leaving, it’s that we’re joining the rest of the world, the EU is practically a contrived cave of economic exclusivity, keeping the likes of rapidly growing global trade blocs and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) markets at arms length. To leave the EU is not a messy divorce, how can it be when we never agreed to this ‘marriage’ in the first place, the UK public never asked to be undemocratically ruled, there’s absolutely no obligation or guilt-bound sense of duty dictating that we must stay, so why stay?
A vote for Brexit is a vote for Britain, a vote for keeping our cultural roots intact, a vote for reconciling western differences with the rising East, and most importantly; a vote for our eternal right to democracy, liberty and making our own decisions.
This ever relevant campaign video encourages one to look into the banking powers that be.The financial centers at the highest levels are controlled, rates are manipulated not according to genuine demand, but according to the elite’s decisions. Trade is siphoned, valuations muddled, all to create outcomes that favour a select few.
If we look back to 1815, the manipulation of the English stock markets upon Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo brought the Rothschild’s to effective power over the bank of England, this kind of manipulation is still occurring.
Unfortunately this corruption is not of public outlaws as we are continually told to focus on in the news, movies etc, with shows like crime watch programs, Captain America as the hero, and various police interceptor channels (that paint the authorities in a nice image). But of those behind the scenes at the top, behind the smiling face of the likes of Barack Obama, behind the cushioned illusion of choice of the left-right political paradigm, behind the huge media, football games, the party-lifestyles, petty issues, the empty education and the desire for money, sex and general gratification that always distracts us.
These elite men point the finger at the bottom, suggesting that the big issues are the likes of political correctness, white privilege, that one burglary, the illusory patriarchy, Donald Trump, the republican debate, the Superbowl, the Kardashians broke a nail – just anything that is not them. They want us looking in a mirror, they want us to be consumers without philosophers’ mindsets; dumb, insecure, hapless cattle to be channeled and divided, sold and bought, assets for their twisted agenda.
The State, the establishment, Uncle Sam, whatever you want to call it has gotten western men’s testicles and masculinity in a proverbial vice. Men are facing a full frontal assault on their rights, health and culture like never before. The war on masculinity has never been so brutal – but it’s not a war being waged by women. The attack is coming directly from the top, as the establishment desperately attempts to emasculate and disempower men in order to force women to be more dependent on the state, thereby enabling more power to be centralized and aiding the growth of big government.
…it all comprises a cocktail consisting of a misandry-inducing welfare state mashed together with a pervasive, heavily backdoor funded, diversified campaign promoting:
Second Wave Feminism in the objective of a combined front; prioritizing & empowering women, and low-key shaming men, it does not promote equality as some might think. Second wave feminism was a creation of the establishment itself and at its core has little whatsoever to do with genuine concern about women’s rights. Radical feminism deliberately confuses gender roles and makes young men apprehensive about exercising their masculinity for fear of being seen as overbearing or aggressive towards women. This has contributed to an entire generation of “metrosexual” men who are promiscuous, unwilling to commit to a relationship and unable to fulfil a women’s basic needs for healthy companionship, destabilizing society and making it more difficult for women to find suitable long term partners with whom to have children.
Pushing of the sham ‘political correctness’; purveying the false, sensationalized notion that there is a oppressive patriarchy, however this has been debunked pay gaps are non-existent once numerous circumstantial factors are considered. So feminism’s real objective is simply to downplay healthy masculinity as ‘oppressive’.
Statists, collectivists and their mouthpieces in the media and the establishment claim that western men (in particular white men) cannot express a valid opinion on any issue related in any way to a “minority” (such as feminism or immigration) because they have “privilege”. The “privilege” talking point is a stunt through which liberals and feminists attempt to shut down free speech. In essence they are asserting the ludicrous notion that a man’s viewpoint has no value because of the color of his skin, his gender or his country of origin. This is an inherently racist position, yet it is routinely used by leftists to shout down their ideological adversaries and silence male voices.
Whereas women have numerous safety nets to turn to if they become victims of domestic abuse, men have virtually none, despite the fact that domestic abuse against men is a huge and growing problem. In the UK for example, 44 per cent of domestic abuse victims are male, while more married men suffer abuse at the hands of their spouse than married women. While domestic abuse against women is constantly highlighted by the mass media, domestic abuse against men is a complete non-issue.
Dissident feminist Camille Paglia recently wrote a Wall Street Journal piece in which she warned, “What you’re seeing is how a civilization commits suicide.” Paglia was referring to how the emancipation of masculine virtues by the establishment threatens to create massive destabilization in society due to less and less men being able to fill traditionally “masculine” roles in the jobs market. Paglia points to schools cutting recess, the effort to deny the biological distinctions between men and women, and the left’s characterization of controversial opinions as “hate speech” as examples of how masculinity is being deliberately eroded. “Masculinity is just becoming something that is imitated from the movies. There’s nothing left. There’s no room for anything manly right now,” warns Paglia, adding that young men have, “no models of manhood.”
True feminism and true liberalism have been smeared by establishment funded smear campaigns aimed at disenfranchising these ideological standpoints and completely destroying what they were originally.
In both divorce and child custody proceedings, it is widely acknowledged that courts heavily favor women and discriminate against men. Men are routinely hit with onerous alimony payments even if women are capable of working and earning a good paycheck. Men only receive custody of their children in around 10 per cent of divorce cases in the United States. The ironic thing about this system is that it has primarily been instituted by other men, emphasizing again how the war on men is being waged not by women, but by the primarily male-dominated establishment itself.
The establishment promulgates the myth that men are paid more than women because of discrimination, feeding into feminist doctrines about patriarchal systems oppressing women in the workplace. In reality, the “wage gap” of around 19 per cent between the two sexes in the United States is explained by a number of reasons that have nothing to do with discrimination, including the fact that men work more hours and men seek less desirable jobs that pay higher. As a result, men account for 93% of workplace deaths despite being only 54% of the workforce. 94% of workplace suicides every year are also men. The establishment buries these shockingly high male workplace fatality figures because they completely contradict the myth that the jobs market discriminates against women.
The rampant dissemination of pornography compromises the need to pursue a partner for many men, or at least deters it significantly.
Hormone disrupting chemicals in pesticides & plastics i.e. phtalates, all designed to feminize the male, “Boys exposed to high levels of these in the womb were less likely than other boys to play with cars, trains and guns or engage in “rougher” games like playfighting,”
The wide promotion of homosexuality, a gay man is not generally masculine.
The romanticized demeanor of shyness and underwhelming male characters in popular culture, in another time this would have been ostracized. Whereas 50 years ago, advertising, Hollywood and television was filled with examples of positive masculine role models that young men could look up to, today’s entertainment industry routinely portrays men as clueless and bumbling oafs at best (think Homer Simpson, Everybody Loves Raymond, Married With Children) or at worst as aggressive sexual predators. Since advertising is primarily aimed at women, men in commercials are also now routinely depicted as either being emasculated losers or stupefied morons. Young men consuming this content grow up thinking that it is acceptable and even encouraged to aspire to these character traits. In doing so, they are robbed of their natural masculinity and find it extremely difficult to attract well-rounded women, who are rightly disgusted by such behavior. The entertainment industry is largely controlled by men, again underscoring the fact that this assault is a top down trend that has little or nothing to do with the gender war.
& the promotion of female assertiveness in popular culture (designed to subvert masculine traits).
Propagation of fattening, testosterone eliminating foodstuffs; fast food and canned beer is a big culprit in this context.
Wide promotion of handheld devices, that largely unknowingly cause sperm count and sperm motility to plummet when carried in the trouser pockets of men. Other negative effects are not yet fully known, as studies are suppressed.
Vaccines that sap vital resources in early childhood and foetal development, producing severely malnourished, emasculated men that have chemical imbalances leading to transgender conversions in many cases – or produce men trapped on the borderline between male and female.
The rise of autism in itself in many cases estranges a person from interaction with their fellow human on a healthy basis – caused mainly by vaccines, fluoridation, various toxic substances and the big one: aluminium.
Liberal viewpoints pushed in mainstream education, not just feminism and Marxism. More and more colleges and universities are intolerant of conservative perspectives, liberalism is a very feminine, emotionally based ideology – and more men are forced to uptake liberal viewpoints to get the girl, else be called ‘racist’ or generally shunned. Men must be subservient to gain the liberal girl they desire. Establishment-controlled second wave feminism advances the doctrine of cultural Marxism, which claims that oppression emerges from patriarchal society and culture, and not the state. Governments love cultural Marxism because it absolves them of blame. The true source of all oppression has always been the state, but by blaming it on men or western culture in general (which is primarily shaped by men), the state hides its own responsibility.
The promotion of virtual reality sex and sex substitutes for single men – this keeps men away from women and forming healthy partnerships. In Japan, this is especially prominent, and a prime cause for their population decline.
Promotion of the independent woman, and the removal of the false glass ceiling. This discourages marriages, and plummets natal rates to all time lows in western populations.
With a decline of culture & family traditions, the family roles will be broken down and any kids that are born will either have substandard parenting or will be given up as orphans to the state. The state is ultimately going to dictate a child’s upbringing. This makes the masculine male evermore redundant.
Welfare state and benefits reduces the need for child-bearing women to rely on the man for resources. The state cuckolds the man and reduces his relevance in the marriage – thus reducing the relevance of marriage altogether!
With emasculation oftentimes comes sexual incompatibility, which brews depression and neurotic conditions; leading to a narrow, confused mode of thinking, further driving an individual into the quagmire of despair.
This ties into the New World Order’s (NWO) goal to crush the traditional western family that has been persistent for eons, and ties into destroying the stable family expectations declared in the Holy Bible, social engineering at its finest.
Migrants coming in are generally far more masculine than the western man, they also have little interest in obliging their obedience to western doctrine, this proves in part that the overriding agenda is to inundate the sterile, emasculated west with the fertile, masculine migrants who will take over ideologically and genetically due to their tendency towards rapid and fruitful reproduction and the inherent passing-on of their socialist, liberty-opposed ideas and ways of life i.e. Islamic Sharia Law. Furthermore, the migrant man is generally taught to hate the Kafir (non-believer), even if it is subtle, the wars against their native nations do not help with the reconciliation effort, and do not guarantee that everyone will make up and just be friends anytime soon; it’s all a rather far cry from integration. Yet forced open borders, and unchecked migration still takes place.
Chinese communism/socialism is a wet dream for corporate heads, importing and establishing this ideology with near-east migrants or ‘refugees’ is a simple solution to quelling the fire of western liberty that threatens their control. The migrants have the right mindset, they also will breed quickly. Methods and deployment are therefore astute, the investment of a funded migrant crisis is rather worthwhile.
Psychology dictates that women are always seeking a provider, a ‘shadow’ individual to maintain the resources they require to bring up a child. This yearning is woven into the female genetics and is exemplified in the current exploitation that is taking place. The welfare state is robbing men of that provider role and shifting the reliance to the governing authority which gives these lucrative handouts such as child benefits.
Suffrage (Giving women the vote) coupled with third wave feminism, is another generator of the welfare state, the failure of society to appeal to our inherent gender roles has knocked the implicitly logical, leadership of men astray. More and more ‘stay-at-home’ dads are taking up the carer roles of now working women, the gender roles have been effectively flipped.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.
Psychoactive plants reputedly have the potential to induce transcendental experiences that may help one surpass the ‘5 sense’ realm of the sensual realm, and pierce the veil in terms of self actualization and spirituality; in a world where we are ruthlessly encouraged to look to the external world for our answers, our purpose, our definition, our identity. Ayahuasca might be our gateway back within, or should I say out – we are inside out universes after all.
Graham Hancock, pioneer in the dissemination of information regarding the use and effects of psychoactive plants, conveys a TED talk in an attempt to de-stigmatize a gray area in modern science. Blotted by major pharmaceutical companies and crony governments that likely wish to keep their populaces contained:
The essence of Hancock’s talk covered how Ayahuasca and Psilocin mushrooms are downplayed as negatively mind altering, a stigma that has been the commonest excuse for classifying psychoactive mushrooms as harmful drugs in numerous countries across the planet.
The few remaining shamanistic groups that undergo regular use of these mushrooms have expressed great concern in regards to the direction of a de-spiritualized America and general western world. Pinning a lack of spiritual exposure to the noticeable aberration from empathetic behaviour and an acquiescence of ignorance, materialism and a host of other sinful activities that lack empathetic foresight.
Psychedelic drugs are illegal not due to health reasons, else alcohol and cigarettes (that actually damage you) would also be made illegal, they (psychedelics) are illegal due to the following…
“Psychedelics are illegal, not because the government is concerned you will jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and cultural trappings, models of behaviour and preconceived notions of information processing.” – Terence McKenna (Paraphrased)
Don’t follow your dreams?
Ayahuasca may also be a cancer mitigation approach?
The EU is rapidly unifying itself under wraps, anticipating a final reveal at a point where there is no turning back, when the populations are mixed enough with a sufficient number of economic migrants to lock the European continent into maintaining this undemocratic welfare Union that the poorer, deprived people of the near-east will defend to the last breath, to them this is paradise – politics and corruption is their absolute norm, their predisposition imported en masse in what I call ‘ideological imports’; yet another damning facet of unlimited globalization rearing its head. The overly liberal westerners have been programmed to accept their fate, political correctness debarring them of confronting ‘tentative’ talking points such as the ever more pressing migration control (disguised as a necessity with ‘refugees’ – the majority are non-refugees and are travelling only to welfare states, hmmm, red herring much?), EU democracy, and the blighting topic that is racism.
The latest bastardizing unveiling, that had been dwelling under the surface for a good time is the proposed EU army, an entity comprised of the combined armed forces of all EU member states. It is no doubt another consolidation effort to well and truly subjugate independent politics and to generate an anti-Russian/Chinese bloc that will eventually develop the manpower of China or India via the importation of the family fond near-east people. The rapid housing boom in Europe is a telling sign of what is to come. It is a massive geo-political chess game that the twisted kingpins have unfortunately necessitated in the ever rampant crash course of their wholly fallible agenda.
The EU is not really about progression, it is the opposite, it masquerades as progression yet it hypocritically excludes eastern markets, the EU is selfish in that it seeks to only embellish and gratify itself, excluding Russian trade altogether (and sanctions Russia too!), and favoring in-EU & US trade deals over all else. A world that is all inclusive and reconciled does not seek to be isolationist in blocs, blocs appear to be the new western form of isolationism – the phony bureaucrats seek to use failed EU ‘multiculturalism’ to cover up this blatant fact; that the EU is ironically the opposite of inclusive in pretty much all respects.
Barack Obama, figurehead of the anti-Russian USA who churlishly threatened Britain with a ‘back of the queue’ priority if their EU referendum renders them out in June 2016.
The EU is selfish in that it fails to account for the individual democratic rights of the member states, bargaining the worn out crony excuse that ‘you still have this much lawmaking leeway, be grateful’ yet the same jeering unelected EU bureaucratic politicians have time and time again shown that the EU is a failing project. Perhaps it’s high time to hand back over the reins to the rightful owners? The EU has demonstrated that it does not seek to appeal to the interests of the individual states, but yearns to take control on the basis of the entirety. Boris was right about the Nazi dream for a unified Europe being reflected in the EU:
Mr Johnson warned that while bureaucrats in Brussels are using “different methods” from the Nazi dictator, they share the aim of unifying Europe under one “authority”.
The EU is selfish in that it shamelessly propagates the ‘correct treatment’ of migrants and therefore the policies that bring them in, these are the same ‘migrants’ that have often failed to show an interest in integrating, often sought to settle solely for welfare benefits, have spiked the Euro-wide crime rates, especially in welfare nations, and have often come in unaccounted for in the shambles that is called Schengen that masquerades as being economically beneficial. The guilt-trip tactics with half drowned refugees need to stop.
The EU is selfish because it is not flexible, upon its inception in the 70s the ‘European Trade agreement’ seemed rather lucrative in an age overshadowed by the hulking Soviet bloc, the countries of western Europe saw an opportunity for solidarity in this time of trepidation. Since the early 90s this need for trade blocs has dissipated with the fall of the Soviet Union, is it not now necessary to mirror the modern world instead of getting caught in a mirror from three decades back?
The EU is selfish because it has no concern for the native populations of its member states. The ever burdening influx of migrants has blown open the gates of Europe, as English musician Stephen Patrick Morrissey stated:
“England is a memory now,” he says, in an interview with the NME published yesterday. “The gates are flooded and anybody can have access to England and join in.” – The Independent, 2007
The result is cultural Marxism, an effective slow kill of western ways and ideologies from the inside out. Starting with the big urban centers of the flagship states in Europe. Sharia Islam, third world deprivation and illegal migrants are fueling this one way train into the dark ages. Soon native westerners will be made a minority or a parity with people who buy and large have little to no interest in upholding the already long founded values.
Trade within the EU is also seemingly fragmented, let alone the steep restrictions on looking elsewhere for trade deals:
UK farmers and businesses want to trade everything from beef, chicken, plant-based fuels, cars, medicinal drugs and services such as banking with Latin America.
But while Britain remains a member of the EU it is not permitted to negotiate its own trade deals alone but must wait for Brussels to make arrangements that all 28 EU members agree to.
The EU is currently trying to arrange such a deal with a group of five South American countries, which would allow its member countries, including Britain, to trade. But France and another 13 member states, half of the EU’s 28 members, are attempting to stymie the agreement as they fear the import of cheaper beef, particularly from rivals Brazil and Argentina, as well as other farm products, would create more competition for their farmers.
Back on the topic of the EU army, we can observe how our choices in foreign policy will be dramatically contrived, as those unelected officials guide our share of the garrison, not too unlike the failed Holy Roman Empires’ levies – into wars and conflicts that in some scenarios might not align with the interests of British people, after all – what happened to bottom up rulership?
Despite owing its allegiance to the Crown, the British Army was even ordered to emblazoned Headquarter vehicles with EU flags asserting beyond any doubt that they were not involved in a Nato exercise.
The devolution of the role of NATO (which prides itself on state decision making and vetoes) paves the way for the undemocratic EU army that is just as susceptible to corruption as any other.
“A joint EU army would show the world that there would never again be a war between EU countries,” Juncker told the Welt am Sonntag newspaper. “Such an army would also help us to form common foreign and security policies and allow Europe to take on responsibility in the world.” – Juncker
The truth is this ‘EU Army’ serves the interests of he who controls that army, not the states that chip in to the garrison. By severing allegiances to nation states, the EU bureaucrats can eliminate sentimental patriotism and centralize European armed forces under their roof – giving them a sort of dictatorship over any state that dares question their rule. The more limited the government, the better!
The recent Friday 13th attacks have marked the most devastating ‘terrorist’ attacks on Western Europe of this decade; costing approximately 129 civilians their lives as masked men opened fire with Kalashnikov rifles and used detonation explosives as a technique of suicide to escape incarceration across a few key touristy locations in the French capital, Paris.
ISIS have been marked responsible perpetrators despite no known evidence to suggest this, except an apparent, unsupported claim from the shady governmental organisation.
Now know what I mean?
Incidentally this date coincides with the organisation of the Knights Templars – which kept Muslims out of Europe,
At dawn on Friday, 13 October 1307 (a date sometimes linked with the origin of the Friday the 13th superstition)[30][31] King Philip IV ordered de Molay and scores of other French Templars to be simultaneously arrested. The arrest warrant started with the phrase:
“Dieu n’est pas content, nous avons des ennemis de la foi dans le Royaume” [“God is not pleased. We have enemies of the faith in the kingdom”].[32]
Claims were made that during Templar admissions ceremonies,
recruits were forced to spit on the Cross, deny Christ, and engage in indecent kissing;
brethren were also accused of worshiping idols, and the order was said to have encouraged homosexual practices.
Seems to me that this theater/stadium attack was always meant for the world stage, the New World Order have the media giants at their fingertips – all of this backs their hate manifestation agenda.
The two extremes are coming to clash, if you trap something between a rock and a hard place – you will have opposing forces come into contact.
On one hand we have the legislated mass immigration of refugees, on the other we have a terrorist attack from supposed people of the region of exodus – it doesnt help that the media has drawn similarities between the two – despite the reality being much more different. If anything this riles a hatred of minorities of the region, it gives the USA and co-operational allies the means to continue the invasion and overtaking of the middle east.
I believe it is important to know the difference between muslims and ISIS, they are not one and the same – you can not demonize a peaceful religion for the acts of an extremist few who have manipulated the faith to a twisted agenda that gives a huge religion a bad name in an ever more scientifically dominated world.
Unfortunately, the EU has outgrown its initial purpose of just smoothing trade barriers, it is now attributing unwarranted power to the little known, unelected 
The Spearhead Journal 