Cultural Marxism Explained

The concept of ‘cultural Marxism‘ is a persistent and important term in the world of political activism. It is a term of the utmost pertinence in understanding the globalist spurred motives for the engineered happenings of the past, present, and future. It represents an ideology that seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour, and is therefore totalitarian in nature.

“A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries (the elite).” — Georg Lukacs, Marxist philosopher

If we break it down, the term denotes the gradual denigration and neutralisation of Western ideals through the application of ‘critical theory’ this is essentially destructive criticism of the main elements of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism.

At its core, this is a satanic agenda in disguise. It only takes a quick look into Biblical history to see that Cain, the smith, embodies the socialist-communist icon. Karl Marx was inspired by darkness, as detailed in ‘Marx and Satan’ by Richard Wurmbrand.

“Bilderberg pulls the strings of every government and intelligence agency in the Western world.” ― James Morcan, The Ninth Orphan

The reality will be enslavement, a state of absolute control over the domain of the human body; which is the ‘last frontier’ of autocratic self-determination. It will be a world without the liberties we enjoy today. A climate without the freedoms and natural rights we are presently accustomed to — and take for granted.

“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt.” – Samuel Adams, Essay in the Public Advertiser, 1749

Our Gods will be our overlords (government, from govern: control, and ment: mind), our indoctrinated customs and values will rally under their dominion, our very existence spent in a state of perpetual serfdom and servitude, we will give up our liberty for security and find ourselves chained in a cell.

“The very definition of tyranny is when all powers are gathered under one place.” – James Madison, The Federalist No. 47

It only takes a glance at the godless, communist stronghold, North Korea, to see this system in action. It will be a state of suppressed consciousness, no volume of media shall dissent their supreme narrative, no inkling of doubt shall sway their absolutism. We will be programmed to adore it, and the great teachings of old will be ashes lost in the wind, their peculiar brand of ‘progress’ is the free man’s nightmare.

Dictator Kim Jong Un addresses his footmen.

Cultural Marxism is fundamentally a socialist idea, it shifts what empowers the people to the state level and calls it equality, but in practise it has only ever failed miserably. The natural state of the world is inequality. It is a vain effort to concentrate the burden of inequality in the hands of a few, as this does not escape the self-evident corruptibility of our human condition, we will always be liable to corruption, so why try to fix our imperfections with more imperfection?

The Marxist idea is flawed because of this, it seeks to replace individual morality by addressing morality and justice through state intervention, the truth is these things will never be fixed; it must be left between the deep consultation of the individual and a Bible.

Free will cannot be tamed.

Our free-will means both good and bad, Marxism cannot seem to accept this, so it attempts to tear down what makes us human in order to ‘fix’ us. The truth is, we fix ourselves under the scriptures, self-discipline and following the long-held values we see in Western society; which is largely based on biblical scriptures. Even then, there will still be those who choose to sin.

Socialism is destructive, Capitalism is progressive.

“Socialism is not in the least what is pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of civilisation have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the social order based on private ownership in the means of production has created . . . Each step leading towards Socialism must exhaust itself in the destruction of what already exists.” — Ludvig Von Mises, Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis

More commonly it is known as “multiculturalism”, ‘globalisation’ or, less formally, ‘political correctness’. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as “multiculturalism.” These deceptive monikers mask the ideological root, and have served to dissuade criticism, and show the face of ‘multiculturalism’ as a progressive, virtuous effort. It is quite the contrary.

Churchill addressed the socialist issue astutely, the equal sharing of miseries;

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” — Winston Churchill

Cultural Marxism/Socialism has an end goal, destroying Western culture and Biblical faith, the value system that upholds individual liberty, and prevents tyranny from taking hold.

“If you want total security, go to prison. There you’re fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only thing lacking… is freedom.”— Dwight D. Eisenhower

Ancient roots of socialism.

This pursuit for global governance has been evident since the first stirrings of human civilisation, as noted by scriptures in the Babylonian efforts to build a great tower to the heavens, the iconic tower of Babel.

By placing the Tower of Babel incident just prior to the stories of Abram and his descendants, the biblical writer is suggesting, in the first place, that post-flood humanity is as wicked as pre-flood humanity. Rather than sending something as devastating as a flood to annihilate mankind, however, God now places His hope in a covenant with Abraham as a powerful solution to humanity’s sinfulness. This tells us that force from a higher power (Communism-Socialism) will never save mankind, but mankind must save itself on an individual basis, through the Holy covenant.

This leads right into the Tower of Babel account in 11:1-9. In 11:1, Moses writes, “Now the whole earth used the same language and the same words.” After the flood, the whole earth spoke the same language. But man’s habitual sin brought about the language barrier.

In 11:2, we read these fateful words: “It came about as they journeyed east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there.” The word “east” is intentionally alluded to in the Scriptures, to let us know that a person or group is moving contrary to God’s will. In the Genesis narratives, when man goes “east,” he leaves the land of blessing (Eden and the Promised Land) and goes to a land where the greatest of his hopes will turn to ruin (Babylon and Sodom).¹⁹

• A classical Freemason term of acknowledgement is “I’m travelling in the East“. The East symbolises where the sun rises, and is the icon of rebellion against God.

Please also notice that they “settled” in Shinar. In 9:1, God clearly commanded Noah and his sons to “be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth” (cf. 8:17). There is no reason to suspect that Noah’s descendants did not understand what God wanted. God wanted them to move throughout all the earth but they banded together in order to defy God’s command. They selected the best land that they could find; they staked their claim in the land of Shinar, a place that becomes associated with evil.

They said, ‘Come, let us build for ourselves a city, and a tower whose top will reach into heaven, and let us make for ourselves a name, otherwise we will be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.’” The motivation for building a city was to make the builders a name (cf. Ps 14:1). The object of this endeavor was to establish a center by which they might maintain their unity.²¹ Now God desired unity for humankind, but one that He created, not one founded on a social state. They wanted to “empower” themselves. Both motive and object were ungodly. God had instructed man to fill the earth (1:28), to spread over the whole planet. The builders of the “tower” seem to have intended that it serve as a memorial or landmark among other things.

Socialism attempts to fix humankind with more humankind.

What we have learned here is that looking to society (people)/socialism for the big answers, and not God, is undoubtedly a big mistake. Looking towards self-determination without the values posed by God will bring only chaos, ruin, and anguish. Capitalism leaves us to choose our path relative to the natural laws posed by the Bible, our government fully representative of us, and we representative of our government — socialist governments seldom represent the average man.

“Socialists cry “Power to the people”, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean – power over people, power to the State.” — Margaret Thatcher, speech to Conservative Central Council, March 15, 1986

Socialism/communism (Without religion) puts the authority in the hands of the few people that rule. When will we accept that the human condition is terribly flawed? Human masters are still human, imperfect, and liable to exude these imperfections as we all do, hence the classical term; ‘human error’. We can’t escape that, not even in Marx’s Utopian vision.

The truth is that all of the divisions of the whole world are a result of sin and the righteous judgement of God. Socialism aims to fix this by introducing an eternally ongoing political campaign to pretend that we, as humans, can ever hope to fix sin as a community; it’s simply empty platitude, and a poor disguise to try and make the Bible seem redundant.

Mikhail Bakunin, the infamous Russian anarchist and for a while co-warrior of Marx: “The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words, ‘In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done.’” (He is speaking of Satan)

---

Are the Jews to blame?

Is the Globalist push for a NWO/Marxist-Socialist word order a Jewish plan? No.

Judaism is the true faith, by assuming the identity of Judaism the culprits are able to be hidden in plain sight.

By getting theorists and activists to turn against, and lambaste Judaism, they win in suppressing the Biblical values and practices that are their undoing.

As for Christianity, it is partially true, but overall it is false. ‘Churchianity’ as coined by Michael Rood, is at its roots, a misleading, pagan-influenced cult order that links to sun worship; one of the many names for Satanism. It outright ignores vast amounts of scripture, and does not teach the true practices of the Torah, it is more a weak gesture than a true practice of faith.

In the case of Catholicism, the Papal system is heavily imbued in Satanic practices, Christianity is an imitation of Judaism founded during the Council of Nicaea to conflate pagan deities with Jewish scriptures for the sake of collectivist religion, this made ruling easier for the Roman empire.

All in all, for the hope that we seek, the unity which man cannot find on his own, will only be revealed when we get to God’s covenant promises made to Abram.

I will end on this powerful quote by a former Marxist advocate;

“I remained a socialist for several years, even after my rejection of Marxism; and if there could be such a thing as socialism combined with individual liberty, I would be a socialist still. For nothing could be better than living a modest, simple, and free life in an egalitarian society. It took some time before I recognized this as no more than a beautiful dream; that freedom is more important than equality; that the attempt to realize equality endangers freedom; and that, if freedom is lost, there will not even be equality among the unfree.” — Karl R. Popper, Unended Quest

 

Biblical Faith is Dying

In France, the ‘Jihadists have won’

WASHINGTON – With Christianity dead in France, there is no national political will to address the increasing attacks by radical Islam, says a professor at the University of Paris, which has brought the country to its knees.

The professor, Guy Millière, author of 27 books on France, Europe, the United States and the Middle East, makes some shocking charges in a new commentary for the Gatestone Institute, where he serves as a senior fellow.

“All political parties, including the National Front, talk about the need to establish an ‘Islam of France,’” he writes. “They never explain how, in the Internet age, the ‘Islam of France’ could be different from Islam as it is everywhere else.”

He attributes the capitulation of France to two major factors – the failure of the nation to embrace its own nation culture in schools and universities and the collapse of the Christian faith.

“The slaughter of French priest Father Jacques Hamel on July 26 in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray was significant,” he says. “The church where Father Jacques Hamel was saying mass was nearly empty. Five people were present; three nuns and two faithful. Most of the time, French churches are empty. Christianity in France is dying out. Jacques Hamel was almost 86 years old; despite his age, he did not want to retire. He knew it would be difficult to find someone to replace him. Priests of European descent are now rare in France, as in many European countries. The priest officially in charge of the parish of Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, Auguste Moanda-Phuati, is Congolese.”

He adds: “The French education system does not teach young people to love France and the West. It teaches them instead that colonialism plundered many poor countries, that colonized people had to fight to free themselves, and that the fight is not over. It teaches them to hate France.”

So the future of France, he writes, is more terror.

“The assassins of Father Jacques Hamel are what is coming,” he says. “One of them, Adel Kermiche, was born in France to immigrant parents from Algeria. His path looks like the path followed by many young French Muslims: school failure, delinquency, shift toward a growing hatred of France and the West, return to Islam, transition to radical Islam. The other, Abdel Malik Petitjean, was born in France, too. His mother is Muslim. His father comes from a Christian family. Abdel Malik Petitjean nevertheless followed the same path as Adel Kermiche. A growing number of young French-born Muslims radicalize. A growing number of young French people who have not been educated in Islam nevertheless turn to Islam, then to radical Islam.”

According to Millière, while the education system in France “describes Islam as a religion that brought ‘justice, dignity and tolerance’ wherever it reigned. Seventh-grade students spend the first month of the school year learning what Islamic civilization brought to the world in science, architecture, philosophy and wealth. A few weeks later, they have to memorize texts explaining that the Church committed countless atrocious crimes. Economics textbooks are steeped in Marxism and explain that capitalism exploits human beings and ravages nature. The Holocaust is still in the curriculum, but is taught less and less; teachers who dare to speak of it face aggressive remarks from Muslim students.”

He describes the pattern of national appeasement as “willful blindness, severely pathological denial, and a resigned, suicidal acceptance of what is coming.”

He faults the nation’s media as well: “French mainstream media do their best to hide the truth. Abdel Malik Petitjean and Adel Kermiche [the attackers in the church massacre] are described as troubled and depressed young people who slipped ‘inexplicably’ toward barbarity. Their actions are widely presented as having nothing to do with Islam. The same words were used to depict Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, the jihadist who murdered 86 people in Nice on July 14th. These words were used to depict all the jihadists who killed in France during the last few years. Each time, Muslim intellectuals are invited to speak, and invariably explain that Islam is peaceful and that Muslims are guilty of nothing.”

“For several days after the attack in Nice, it seemed that the country was on the verge of explosion,” writes Millière. “This is no longer so. The French population seems resigned. The anger expressed by political leaders after the attack in Nice has already faded. Some political leaders in France call for tougher measures, but speak of ‘Islamic terrorism’ very rarely. They know that speaking too much of ‘Islamic terrorism’ could be extremely bad for their future careers. Prime Minister Manuel Valls recently said that France would become an example – a ‘center of excellence’ in the ‘teaching of Islamic theology.’”

Millière says Jews continue to flee France as synagogues and Jewish schools throughout the country must be guarded around the clock by armed soldiers.

“Jews who are still in France know that wearing a skullcap or a Star of David is extremely dangerous,” he writes. “They seem to see that appeasement is a dead end. They often emigrate to the country that appeasers treat as a scapegoat and that Islamists want to destroy: Israel. They know that when in Israel, they might have to confront jihadists like those who kill in France, but they also know that Israelis are more ready to fight to defend themselves.”

He writes: “Many French Jews fleeing the country recalled an Islamic phrase in Arabic: ‘First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people.’ In other words, first Muslims attack Jews; then when the Jews are gone, they attack Christians. It is what we have been seeing throughout the Middle East.”

“There will be no civil war in France,” he concludes. “The jihadists have won. They will kill again. They love to kill. They love death. They say, ‘we love death more than you love life.’”