The EU: Pros & Cons

The EU: Straight Talking Facts

The European Union (EU), having come into fruition in the early 70s as a trade bloc/customs union in the face of the ever hulking USSR, has now become evermore redundant in modern times, where openness presently discards insularity and the thaw of the Cold War has given rise to a more amicable, diplomatic global stage (not an era where shut-in trade blocs seemed like the future). The EU is thus, no longer bearing the relevancy as a defensive bulwark of economic fortification that it once was.

Unfortunately, the EU has outgrown its initial purpose of just smoothing trade barriers, it is now attributing unwarranted power to the little known, unelected 5 presidents of the EU institutions (that I reckon you cannot name) seated in the Brussels complex, and undemocratically granting these quango figureheads substantially unchallenged political sway over the 28 member states that comprise the union. i.e. holding influential authority over upwards of 50% of UK laws by means of EU regulations.

“Free from EU rules and regulations, Britain could reinvent itself as a Singapore-style supercharged economy.” (Upon Brexit)

So let’s evaluate the pros and cons of remaining or seceding from a  Union that has rapidly evolved in recent times without nearly enough audition.

---

The Pros/Cons of staying in the EU

Pros: Trade and inter-connectivity inside Europe: trade between the member states is admittedly somewhat smoother, the EU delivers in the initial goal of achieving this. The EU is a single market in which no tariffs are imposed on imports and exports between member states. “More than 50 percent of our exports go to EU countries” this is essentially modeled at forgetting individual states, you will see this fluidity becoming so much so that individual states become unrecognizable by approximately 2060, in a Babel-esque move for an absolutist European singularity, distinct cultural ties must be liquidated. To some this is progressive as provides unity in the aftermath of two world wars, however other sources have suggested that it is solely in the interest of certain powers to combat the rise of a Russia-China unification (China is a 800 million hard-working person powerhouse!) by boosting Europe as a Bloc of the front-line against the rising Eastern world, reflected in the exclusion of both Russia and China in EU trade negotiations. To me it seems to be a dichotomy making effort that will only further the rift between the East and the West, and exacerbate the chances of a third world war being initiated.

Cons: Trade and inter-connectivity inside Europe: The EU locks member states into being answerable to the decisions of the presidents of the EU commission at Brussels for the majority of our trade agreements, most of which are heavily regulated and strictly forbid us branching out on our own basis to trade with China, Russia, or India for example (the stat of 50% of exports going to the EU is very variable, for example these exports could go to world markets if we left the EU, or would remain going to Europe, just not under the EU.) The EU solely embraces the concept that will fuse all member states under one unified roof; the need for sovereign parliaments will eventually be wiped away, the EU naturally does not give us free reign over our own trade because honouring individual states is not its ultimate aim or agenda: one massive state ruled by unaccountable, unelected ministers is! Doesn’t seem sensible to me, as most problems of the world have nearly always arisen from big government.

The EU is rather akin to the USSR both in structure and practice, and is poised to soon enough become waywardly socialist by importing socialist leaning people en masse!

• By 2020 all EU member states must adopt the Euro; including Great Britain. Forget the rhetoric that suggests we retain the pound.
• Further political centralization is expected to be drawn into Brussels once the UK Referendum is over.
• Goldman Sachs and big banks love the EU as it gives them extended control over the economies of Europe via the incredibly centralized Brussels, a single market is much easier to dominate and influence. Check Here for more on that.
• Kalashnikovs and terrorist armaments, not to mention drugs and contraband are easily getting around Europe with the fallible Schengen area, worsening crime and enabling heightened deployability  of terrorist operations akin to the recent Brussels bombings.

• Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, who has come out in favour of Brexit, says we are leaving the “door open” to terrorist attacks by remaining in the EU. “This open border does not allow us to check and control people.”

---

Pros: Borderless Migration: getting around Europe is made easy, the Schengen area permits free movement of people and their labour, but usually at the cost of depriving weaker countries and reinforcing already economically strong states. The trade-in for this is migrants from within Europe can greatly boost economies and labour-forces, but at the cost of the average wage declining in the host nation. This benefits CEOs mainly, who will inevitably make more money with a more grateful, low-salary workforce. The legislation of the Working Time Directive seems to cover this up, however there is a huge incentive for CEOs to back staying in based on cheaper labour from free movement within the EU that favours low pay workers most (that they want), not the middle-class natives and SME business owners, who are already settled comfortably.

• Case Study: Migrant workers are simply leaving a crumbling Spanish economy and coming to the UK, pushing down our wages, increasing job and property contest here, and crippling the Spanish yet further. it is this economic centralization and the favouring of the flagship states in Europe that is doing an injustice to the weaker states in Europe.
• Without restrictions on who comes here (The UK), the poorer provider countries lose population and their workers (both skilled and unskilled) people flood into richer countries without much audition. There is no limitation. Yet ironically there is discriminant limitation on those who can come here from outside the EU, it all screams a basket case, single population state that is being slowly implemented.
• Case Study: Turkey is set to be fast-tracked to join the EU, using its efforts at siphoning migrant flow through its borders as a reason for its accelerated inclusion. This will be opening the gates to 75 million Turks to have free travel across the board, putting more stress on the UK and other EU flagship states. David Cameron has lied concerning this issue claiming it would take ‘decades’ for the Turks to get in, but that disregards the reality the EU parliament can override legal processes and the general consensus favours Turkey getting in early.
• 8% of Turks are ISIS sympathizers! That’s roughly around 6000,000 people.

Defence minister Penny Mordaunt said the migrant crisis would hasten talks over Turkey’s EU bid and the UK was powerless to stop it.

---

Cons: Borderless Migration: We have little control over who comes into the country, because the EU has overextended itself so much, and independent states can no longer act independently with their own borders. Illegal migrants from outside the EU are quite easily physically gaining access by crossing narrow straits and passing into the continent without scrutiny via Schengen, gaining visas with less and less requirements. These migrants often have no interest in benefiting the EU in many cases, flocking to the welfare states such as the UK or Germany for the freebie financial incentives and establishing themselves, utterly unconcerned with meaningfully integrating themselves; giving way to ethnic enclaves and the transformation of the entire political landscape, it is a replacement, not an integration.

The social impacts are severe, Islamic people now form majorities in a few European capitals, and ethnic enclaves are on the rise. This is not about race, because massed, unlimited migration shifts the entire political and social structure of a country to accommodate eastern principles, legal standpoints such as the oppressive Shariah law are now being encouraged and enabled due to the largely Islamic, unintegrated majority populaces voting in leaders that favour Islamic, non-western ideologies over progressive, western ones. It’s a natural consequence of mass-migration, and a lack of successful migrant integration.

The numbers don’t lie on estimated European Union Migration to the UK, but David Cameron has lied concerning Migration and its limitation numerous times, especially regarding his claims to limit migration to the tens of thousands during his term, this has not happened as shown above, EU Freedom of movement in itself actually prohibits it!

Cameron claims in the video below that he’s using standards for the citizenship of migrants to curb overall migration, yet migrant unemployment is at 70% or at least high, with them not being deported despite Cameron claiming that deportation would be imposed on unemployed, welfare sapping migrants. Again, he lies, and he’s very good at lying. Migration is not going to be reduced, do not kid yourself. Cameron wants to appease the voter to get his way now, then just continue this devastating trend unhindered after the referendum.

Support for Socialist parties, and the favouring of big government with these migrants gaining the majority vote perpetuates the issue further. An inside-out transformation of political opinion is occurring, the migrant crisis is effectively a political Trojan Horse for converting public opinion which favours growing the EU further. The longer the EU is intact, the more majoritarian democracy is bent to the unelected EU kingpins by mass importing the opinion they want.

• Social Impacts, conversion/replacement of western culture to regressive eastern ways due to sheer lack of integration. ‘White Flight‘, the rise of segregationist groups such as Britain First, and the election of Muslim London Mayor Sadiq Khan prove that there is an unaddressed, growing cultural divergence in the UK.

Welfare, the big incentive for migrants coming in their million hordes.

The goal of the EU is to bring about an increasingly socialist climate in its member states, that’s why it is ever increasingly comparable to the Soviet Union and its’ pet states. Migrants, generally poorer, are the only demographic that are going to overwhelmingly accept this vision.

• Stress on services and housing from dramatic migration could push the NHS to collapse & go private, and national housing prices to skyrocket considerably, this level of migration is simply unsustainable.
• Stress on jobs from migration will drive down our wages, and generate more competition, making the entire climate more difficult for everyone financially, and with their employability – CEOs love the large pool of candidates, but the common people just suffer as a result.
• Migrants favour their own gain (welfare state) and do not prioritize liberties and constitutional values nearly as much as the western people do (The EU has no active constitution suppressing authoritarianism or enforcing the democratic rights of the people) largely ignored in mainstream debates about the EU. They (Migrants) are used as voting fodder to bolster socialism, and consolidating larger, more controlling governmental entities (Favours EU). And of course, to ultimately forget the western culture that had originally kindled democracy, liberty, progressive Christian values, and the vital, ever-important constitutional documents such as the Magna Carta that ensure democratic liberties remain intact. The EU is the utter antithesis of this and uses penchant bribes; i.e.  cheaper landline costs and cheaper flights to win over less politically knowledgeable people to vote for it!

---

Pros: Favours Poorer Migrants & Refugees: to them, this is positive as it gives these people from greatly poorer states an opportunity to come and work in 1st world welfare states such as the UK, Sweden and Germany. They get accommodated, they get pension guarantees, they get housing – the EU is grooming them and enticing them, and they do not care about their impact on the natives, the notion of Kafirs (non-believers) is prominent throughout Islamic culture (A predominant faith of migrants), a discriminatory ideology in the Qu’ran that orders Islamic people to disdain all non-believers.

Does this seem conducive to overall successful integration to you? …

The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse.

Here are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.

• “Multiculturalism”: It has been argued by many that multiculturalism has ‘enriched’ European cultures; in reality it does not work particularly well and actually causes social divides. It is positive for those of foreign backgrounds as the EU is pushing for prioritizing migrants settlers over natives, introducing quotas providing pole-position for migrants in attaining employment. What it does do is import a more amicable workforce for big companies and bring in people grateful to work for pennies, people who will vote in bigger government, people who will favour the EU.

Cons: Favours Poor Migrants & Refugees: most of these alleged ‘refugees’ – a term that has been used in conjunction with guilt-tripping media imagery to push the idea that we must accept mass migration is actually misleading. Most migrants are not refugees from Syria, many gain access to Europe in the guise of these refugees, but are only really interested in the ‘good life’ of welfare & benefits. This ‘refugee’ sham is used by the EU commissioners as an excuse to force EU states to accept these ‘refugees’ in massive, unlimited numbers out of liberal-backed sympathy, an emotional attachment that has silenced voices of reason on many platforms with dismissive buzz words like ‘racist’ that discourage in-depth debate.

• Remainers argue constantly that we need this level of migration to fill in labour gaps and assure the receipt of skilled workers from abroad, however let us not forget that we can easily drop the current unhindered migration system that does not base itself on meritocratic bases, but destructively allows anyone free access – to a better, alternative system that is far more efficient & selective of people that are useful to our economy and have intentions beyond simply settling for the welfare benefits here. i.e. the Australian migration system which is points based and is nondiscriminatory.

Opposing view: The UK already has a points-based system for non-EU migrants and it is not clear why inventing a different system – with less flexibility – would be a good idea. – BBC ‘Reality Check’

Leave EU Response: Yes, we have a points system for non-EU migrants, however the whole Leave argument concerns introducing this points based system for all migrants everywhere, and not being discriminatory by reserving this points system to just migrants that are outside the EU, that is nonsensical.

The EU simply intends to encourage mass-immigration by keeping the union exempt of points-based migration policies. This emphasizes mass-migratory patterns that are unkempt and radical in their demeanor and favour the inducement of an excess of lower class workers for top flight corporations to absorb, it also accelerates the centralization of the EU as these migrants overwhelmingly tend to vote in bigger government.

---

The Membership Fee

The fee for membership is stated as:

• The gross contribution in 2015 was £17.8bn but the UK rebate was worth £4.9bn – BBC

This means it cost us £12.9 billion/£350m a week last year to be a member of the EU club, money that could go towards our own national ambitions, and could have utterly eliminated the austerity measures imposed in recent years for example.

A remain argument suggests that:

• After Brexit, the UK would still have to contribute to the EU budget to retain access to the single market.

While this is true, it would cost less than the current fees, and with Brexit we will have the freedom to trade with other global trade blocs, not just the EU (which is actually the slowest growing trade bloc in the world), the EU has been compared to a dead corpse that we have shackled ourselves to.

There is also a strong argument for the EU collapsing if we exit, other countries have suggested an interest in escaping and following the UK out of the door if Brexit follows through. This renders the misguided analogy of us being ‘outsiders’ void and null, as we can still trade with the EU post-Brexit and we regain our own independence in regards to negotiating trade deals with proven-to-be more prosperous trade blocs, it’s a win for the UK and its interests.

---

The International Relations Argument

Remainers have argued that we will somehow be cut afloat upon Brexit and be left to fend for ourselves…

It is this inwards, fear-mongering, herd-mentality, caricatured point of view that has garnered the wide support from swathes of the politically apathetic. As the 5th largest economy in the world, a huge global market for all trade blocs, the financial gateway of the world (City of London), and a wholly competent negotiator at the global table of diplomatic affairs, the UK absolutely stands a solid chance of breaking away from a Union that treats us as a mere appendage in its absurd, uncanny ambitions for a single state of Europe, and eventually a world government.

The reality is that the bureaucratic EU folk needs us more than we need them. It’s a classic gesture that is wholly applicable here, we are a key driving force in the EU’s success. The unelected few in Brussels rely largely on our funding, our influence, our active involvement in their failing project. Without us, the chance of the EU remaining intact is narrow, but remainers would love to perpetuate the ill-informed notion that the EU will somehow sustain itself after our departure, (it’s already very unstable) – and that we’re the ones that will fall afoul of some fabricated imaginary benefit if we do leave.

We’re joining the rest of the world

But it’s not that we’re leaving, it’s that we’re joining the rest of the world, the EU is practically a contrived cave of economic exclusivity, keeping the likes of rapidly growing global trade blocs and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) markets at arms length. To leave the EU is not a messy divorce, how can it be when we never agreed to this ‘marriage’ in the first place, the UK public never asked to be undemocratically ruled, there’s absolutely no obligation or guilt-bound sense of duty dictating that we must stay, so why stay?

A vote for Brexit is a vote for Britain, a vote for keeping our cultural roots intact, a vote for reconciling western differences with the rising East, and most importantly; a vote for our eternal right to democracy, liberty and making our own decisions.

Vote Leave on the 23rd of June.

Rise Up.

This ever relevant campaign video encourages one to look into the banking powers that be.The financial centers at the highest levels are controlled, rates are manipulated not according to genuine demand, but according to the elite’s decisions. Trade is siphoned, valuations muddled, all to create outcomes that favour a select few.

If we look back to 1815, the manipulation of the English stock markets upon Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo brought the Rothschild’s to effective power over the bank of England, this kind of manipulation is still occurring.

That which has been is that which will be, And that which has been done is that which will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9

Unfortunately this corruption is not of public outlaws as we are continually told to focus on in the news, movies etc, with shows like crime watch programs, Captain America as the hero, and various police interceptor channels (that paint the authorities in a nice image). But of those behind the scenes at the top, behind the smiling face of the likes of Barack Obama, behind the cushioned illusion of choice of the left-right political paradigm, behind the huge media, football games, the party-lifestyles, petty issues, the empty education and the desire for money, sex and general gratification that always distracts us.

These elite men point the finger at the bottom, suggesting that the big issues are the likes of political correctness, white privilege, that one burglary, the illusory patriarchy, Donald Trump, the republican debate, the Superbowl, the Kardashians broke a nail – just anything that is not them. They want us looking in a mirror, they want us to be consumers without philosophers’ mindsets; dumb, insecure, hapless cattle to be channeled and divided, sold and bought, assets for their twisted agenda.

The State made Feminism*

The State, the establishment, Uncle Sam, whatever you want to call it has gotten western men’s testicles and masculinity in a proverbial vice. Men are facing a full frontal assault on their rights, health and culture like never before. The war on masculinity has never been so brutal – but it’s not a war being waged by women. The attack is coming directly from the top, as the establishment desperately attempts to emasculate and disempower men in order to force women to be more dependent on the state, thereby enabling more power to be centralized and aiding the growth of big government.

…it all comprises a cocktail consisting of a misandry-inducing welfare state mashed together with a pervasive, heavily backdoor funded, diversified campaign promoting:

• Second Wave Feminism in the objective of a combined front; prioritizing & empowering women, and low-key shaming men, it does not promote equality as some might think. Second wave feminism was a creation of the establishment itself and at its core has little whatsoever to do with genuine concern about women’s rights. Radical feminism deliberately confuses gender roles and makes young men apprehensive about exercising their masculinity for fear of being seen as overbearing or aggressive towards women. This has contributed to an entire generation of “metrosexual” men who are promiscuous, unwilling to commit to a relationship and unable to fulfil a women’s basic needs for healthy companionship, destabilizing society and making it more difficult for women to find suitable long term partners with whom to have children.

• Pushing of the sham ‘political correctness’; purveying the false, sensationalized notion that there is a oppressive patriarchy, however this has been debunked pay gaps are non-existent once numerous circumstantial factors are considered. So feminism’s real objective is simply to downplay healthy masculinity as ‘oppressive’.
• Statists, collectivists and their mouthpieces in the media and the establishment claim that western men (in particular white men) cannot express a valid opinion on any issue related in any way to a “minority” (such as feminism or immigration) because they have “privilege”. The “privilege” talking point is a stunt through which liberals and feminists attempt to shut down free speech. In essence they are asserting the ludicrous notion that a man’s viewpoint has no value because of the color of his skin, his gender or his country of origin. This is an inherently racist position, yet it is routinely used by leftists to shout down their ideological adversaries and silence male voices.

• Whereas women have numerous safety nets to turn to if they become victims of domestic abuse, men have virtually none, despite the fact that domestic abuse against men is a huge and growing problem. In the UK for example, 44 per cent of domestic abuse victims are male, while more married men suffer abuse at the hands of their spouse than married women. While domestic abuse against women is constantly highlighted by the mass media, domestic abuse against men is a complete non-issue.

• Dissident feminist Camille Paglia recently wrote a Wall Street Journal piece in which she warned, “What you’re seeing is how a civilization commits suicide.” Paglia was referring to how the emancipation of masculine virtues by the establishment threatens to create massive destabilization in society due to less and less men being able to fill traditionally “masculine” roles in the jobs market. Paglia points to schools cutting recess, the effort to deny the biological distinctions between men and women, and the left’s characterization of controversial opinions as “hate speech” as examples of how masculinity is being deliberately eroded. “Masculinity is just becoming something that is imitated from the movies. There’s nothing left. There’s no room for anything manly right now,” warns Paglia, adding that young men have, “no models of manhood.”

True feminism and true liberalism have been smeared by establishment funded smear campaigns aimed at disenfranchising these ideological standpoints and completely destroying what they were originally.

• In both divorce and child custody proceedings, it is widely acknowledged that courts heavily favor women and discriminate against men. Men are routinely hit with onerous alimony payments even if women are capable of working and earning a good paycheck. Men only receive custody of their children in around 10 per cent of divorce cases in the United States. The ironic thing about this system is that it has primarily been instituted by other men, emphasizing again how the war on men is being waged not by women, but by the primarily male-dominated establishment itself.
• The establishment promulgates the myth that men are paid more than women because of discrimination, feeding into feminist doctrines about patriarchal systems oppressing women in the workplace. In reality, the “wage gap” of around 19 per cent between the two sexes in the United States is explained by a number of reasons that have nothing to do with discrimination, including the fact that men work more hours and men seek less desirable jobs that pay higher. As a result, men account for 93% of workplace deaths despite being only 54% of the workforce. 94% of workplace suicides every year are also men. The establishment buries these shockingly high male workplace fatality figures because they completely contradict the myth that the jobs market discriminates against women.
• The rampant dissemination of pornography compromises the need to pursue a partner for many men, or at least deters it significantly.
• Hormone disrupting chemicals in pesticides & plastics i.e. phtalates, all designed to feminize the male,  “Boys exposed to high levels of these in the womb were less likely than other boys to play with cars, trains and guns or engage in “rougher” games like playfighting,”
• The wide promotion of homosexuality, a gay man is not generally masculine.
• The romanticized demeanor of shyness and underwhelming male characters in popular culture, in another time this would have been ostracized. Whereas 50 years ago, advertising, Hollywood and television was filled with examples of positive masculine role models that young men could look up to, today’s entertainment industry routinely portrays men as clueless and bumbling oafs at best (think Homer Simpson, Everybody Loves Raymond, Married With Children) or at worst as aggressive sexual predators. Since advertising is primarily aimed at women, men in commercials are also now routinely depicted as either being emasculated losers or stupefied morons. Young men consuming this content grow up thinking that it is acceptable and even encouraged to aspire to these character traits. In doing so, they are robbed of their natural masculinity and find it extremely difficult to attract well-rounded women, who are rightly disgusted by such behavior. The entertainment industry is largely controlled by men, again underscoring the fact that this assault is a top down trend that has little or nothing to do with the gender war.
• & the promotion of female assertiveness in popular culture (designed to subvert masculine traits).
• Propagation of fattening, testosterone eliminating foodstuffs; fast food and canned beer is a big culprit in this context.
• Wide promotion of handheld devices, that largely unknowingly cause sperm count and sperm motility to plummet when carried in the trouser pockets of men. Other negative effects are not yet fully known, as studies are suppressed.
• Vaccines that sap vital resources in early childhood and foetal development, producing severely malnourished, emasculated men that have chemical imbalances leading to transgender conversions in many cases – or produce men trapped on the borderline between male and female.
• The rise of autism in itself in many cases estranges a person from interaction with their fellow human on a healthy basis – caused mainly by vaccines, fluoridation, various toxic substances and the big one: aluminium.
• Liberal viewpoints pushed in mainstream education, not just feminism and Marxism. More and more colleges and universities are intolerant of conservative perspectives, liberalism is a very feminine, emotionally based ideology – and more men are forced to uptake liberal viewpoints to get the girl, else be called ‘racist’ or generally shunned. Men must be subservient to gain the liberal girl they desire. Establishment-controlled second wave feminism advances the doctrine of cultural Marxism, which claims that oppression emerges from patriarchal society and culture, and not the state. Governments love cultural Marxism because it absolves them of blame. The true source of all oppression has always been the state, but by blaming it on men or western culture in general (which is primarily shaped by men), the state hides its own responsibility.
• The promotion of virtual reality sex and sex substitutes for single men – this keeps men away from women and forming healthy partnerships. In Japan, this is especially prominent, and a prime cause for their population decline.
• Promotion of the independent woman, and the removal of the false glass ceiling. This discourages marriages, and plummets natal rates to all time lows in western populations.

• With a decline of culture & family traditions, the family roles will be broken down and any kids that are born will either have substandard parenting or will be given up as orphans to the state. The state is ultimately going to dictate a child’s upbringing. This makes the masculine male evermore redundant.
• Welfare state and benefits reduces the need for child-bearing women to rely on the man for resources. The state cuckolds the man and reduces his relevance in the marriage – thus reducing the relevance of marriage altogether!
• With emasculation oftentimes comes sexual incompatibility, which brews depression and neurotic conditions; leading to a narrow, confused mode of thinking, further driving an individual into the quagmire of despair.

This ties into the New World Order’s (NWO) goal to crush the traditional western family that has been persistent for eons, and ties into destroying the stable family expectations declared in the Holy Bible, social engineering at its finest.

---

Migrants coming in are generally far more masculine than the western man, they also have little interest in obliging their obedience to western doctrine, this proves in part that the overriding agenda is to inundate the sterile, emasculated west with the fertile, masculine migrants who will take over ideologically and genetically due to their tendency towards rapid and fruitful reproduction and the inherent passing-on of their socialist, liberty-opposed ideas and ways of life i.e. Islamic Sharia Law. Furthermore, the migrant man is generally taught to hate the Kafir (non-believer), even if it is subtle, the wars against their native nations do not help with the reconciliation effort, and do not guarantee that everyone will make up and just be friends anytime soon; it’s all a rather far cry from integration. Yet forced open borders, and unchecked migration still takes place.

Chinese communism/socialism is a wet dream for corporate heads, importing and establishing this ideology with near-east migrants or ‘refugees’ is a simple solution to quelling the fire of western liberty that threatens their control. The migrants have the right mindset, they also will breed quickly. Methods and deployment are therefore astute, the investment of a funded migrant crisis is rather worthwhile.

Psychology dictates that women are always seeking a provider, a ‘shadow’ individual to maintain the resources they require to bring up a child. This yearning is woven into the female genetics and is exemplified in the current exploitation that is taking place. The welfare state is robbing men of that provider role and shifting the reliance to the governing authority which gives these lucrative handouts such as child benefits.

Suffrage (Giving women the vote) coupled with third wave feminism, is another generator of the welfare state, the failure of society to appeal to our inherent gender roles has knocked the implicitly logical, leadership of men astray. More and more ‘stay-at-home’ dads are taking up the carer roles of now working women, the gender roles have been effectively flipped.

A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

Graham Hancock: Psychedelics

Psychoactive plants reputedly have the potential to induce transcendental experiences that may help one surpass the ‘5 sense’ realm of the sensual realm, and pierce the veil in terms of self actualization and spirituality; in a world where we are ruthlessly encouraged to look to the external world for our answers, our purpose, our definition, our identity. Ayahuasca might be our gateway back within, or should I say out – we are inside out universes after all.

Graham Hancock, pioneer in the dissemination of information regarding the use and effects of psychoactive plants, conveys a TED talk in an attempt to de-stigmatize a gray area in modern science. Blotted by major pharmaceutical companies and crony governments that likely wish to keep their populaces contained:

 

The essence of Hancock’s talk covered how Ayahuasca and Psilocin mushrooms are  downplayed as negatively mind altering, a stigma that has been the commonest excuse for classifying psychoactive mushrooms as harmful drugs in numerous countries across the planet.

The few remaining shamanistic groups that undergo regular use of these mushrooms have expressed great concern in regards to the direction of a de-spiritualized America and general western world. Pinning a lack of spiritual exposure to the noticeable aberration from empathetic behaviour and an acquiescence of ignorance, materialism and a host of other sinful activities that lack empathetic foresight.

Psychedelic drugs are illegal not due to health reasons, else alcohol and cigarettes (that actually damage you) would also be made illegal, they (psychedelics) are illegal due to the following…

“Psychedelics are illegal, not because the government is concerned you will jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and cultural trappings, models of behaviour and preconceived notions of information processing.” – Terence McKenna (Paraphrased)

Don’t follow your dreams?

---

Ayahuasca may also be a cancer mitigation approach?

---

 

 

 

 

The EU Army

The EU is rapidly unifying itself under wraps, anticipating a final reveal at a point where there is no turning back, when the populations are mixed enough with a sufficient number of economic migrants to lock the European continent into maintaining this undemocratic welfare Union that the poorer, deprived people of the near-east will defend to the last breath, to them this is paradise – politics and corruption is their absolute norm, their predisposition imported en masse in what I call ‘ideological imports’; yet another damning facet of unlimited globalization rearing its head. The overly liberal westerners have been programmed to accept their fate, political correctness debarring them of confronting ‘tentative’ talking points such as the ever more pressing migration control (disguised as a necessity with ‘refugees’ – the majority are non-refugees and are travelling only to welfare states, hmmm, red herring much?), EU democracy, and the blighting topic that is racism.

 

The latest bastardizing unveiling, that had been dwelling under the surface for a good time is the proposed EU army, an entity comprised of the combined armed forces of all EU member states. It is no doubt another consolidation effort to well and truly subjugate independent politics and to generate an anti-Russian/Chinese bloc that will eventually develop the manpower of China or India via the importation of the family fond near-east people. The rapid housing boom in Europe is a telling sign of what is to come. It is a massive geo-political chess game that the twisted kingpins have unfortunately necessitated in the ever rampant crash course of their wholly fallible agenda.

• The EU is not really about progression, it is the opposite, it masquerades as progression yet it hypocritically excludes eastern markets, the EU is selfish in that it seeks to only embellish and gratify itself, excluding Russian trade altogether (and sanctions Russia too!), and favoring in-EU & US trade deals over all else. A world that is all inclusive and reconciled does not seek to be isolationist in blocs, blocs appear to be the new western form of isolationism – the phony bureaucrats seek to use failed EU ‘multiculturalism’ to cover up this blatant fact; that the EU is ironically the opposite of inclusive in pretty much all respects.

Barack Obama, figurehead of the anti-Russian USA who churlishly threatened Britain with a ‘back of the queue’ priority if their EU referendum renders them out in June 2016.

• The EU is selfish in that it fails to account for the individual democratic rights of the member states, bargaining the worn out crony excuse that ‘you still have this much lawmaking leeway, be grateful’ yet the same jeering unelected EU bureaucratic politicians have time and time again shown that the EU is a failing project. Perhaps it’s high time to hand back over the reins to the rightful owners? The EU has demonstrated that it does not seek to appeal to the interests of the individual states, but yearns to take control on the basis of the entirety. Boris was right about the Nazi dream for a unified Europe being reflected in the EU:

Mr Johnson warned that while bureaucrats in Brussels are using “different methods” from the Nazi dictator, they share the aim of unifying Europe under one “authority”.

• The EU is selfish in that it shamelessly propagates the ‘correct treatment’ of migrants and therefore the policies that bring them in, these are the same ‘migrants’ that have often failed to show an interest in integrating, often sought to settle solely for welfare benefits, have spiked the Euro-wide crime rates, especially in welfare nations, and have often come in unaccounted for in the shambles that is called Schengen that masquerades as being economically beneficial. The guilt-trip tactics with half drowned refugees need to stop.

• The EU is selfish because it is not flexible, upon its inception in the 70s the ‘European Trade agreement’ seemed rather lucrative in an age overshadowed by the hulking Soviet bloc, the countries of western Europe saw an opportunity for solidarity in this time of trepidation. Since the early 90s this need for trade blocs has dissipated with the fall of the Soviet Union, is it not now necessary to mirror the modern world instead of getting caught in a mirror from three decades back?

• The EU is selfish because it has no concern for the native populations of its member states. The ever burdening influx of migrants has blown open the gates of Europe, as English musician Stephen Patrick Morrissey stated:

“England is a memory now,” he says, in an interview with the NME published yesterday. “The gates are flooded and anybody can have access to England and join in.” – The Independent, 2007

The result is cultural Marxism, an effective slow kill of western ways and ideologies from the inside out. Starting with the big urban centers of the flagship states in Europe. Sharia Islam, third world deprivation and illegal migrants are fueling this one way train into the dark ages. Soon native westerners will be made a minority or a parity with people who buy and large have little to no interest in upholding the already long founded values.

Trade within the EU is also seemingly fragmented, let alone the steep restrictions on looking elsewhere for trade deals:

UK farmers and businesses want to trade everything from beef, chicken, plant-based fuels, cars, medicinal drugs and services such as banking with Latin America.

But while Britain remains a member of the EU it is not permitted to negotiate its own trade deals alone but must wait for Brussels to make arrangements that all 28 EU members agree to.

The EU is currently trying to arrange such a deal with a group of five South American countries, which would allow its member countries, including Britain, to trade. But France and another 13 member states, half of the EU’s 28 members, are attempting to stymie the agreement as they fear the import of cheaper beef, particularly from rivals Brazil and Argentina, as well as other farm products, would create more competition for their farmers.

Back on the topic of the EU army, we can observe how our choices in foreign policy will be dramatically contrived, as those unelected officials guide our share of the garrison, not too unlike the failed Holy Roman Empires’ levies – into wars and conflicts that in some scenarios might not align with the interests of British people, after all – what happened to bottom up rulership?

Despite owing its allegiance to the Crown, the British Army was even ordered to emblazoned Headquarter vehicles with EU flags asserting beyond any doubt that they were not involved in a Nato exercise.

The devolution of the role of NATO (which prides itself on state decision making and vetoes) paves the way for the undemocratic EU army that is just as susceptible to corruption as any other.

“A joint EU army would show the world that there would never again be a war between EU countries,” Juncker told the Welt am Sonntag newspaper. “Such an army would also help us to form common foreign and security policies and allow Europe to take on responsibility in the world.” – Juncker

The truth is this ‘EU Army’ serves the interests of he who controls that army, not the states that chip in to the garrison. By severing allegiances to nation states, the EU bureaucrats can eliminate sentimental patriotism and centralize European armed forces under their roof – giving them a sort of dictatorship over any state that dares question their rule. The more limited the government, the better!

Cultural Pick N’ Mix

Cultural decadence/pick n’ mix is the prevalent cancer of the modern world, the exponential growth of third world countries and their often times backwards value systems, medieval outlooks and uncivilized lifestyles has been quietly fomenting, and now unremittingly overflowing onto the European continent and its people via a hint of globalist string-pulling.

If you restrain a civilization for long enough, i.e. the African nations & the middle east, you can perfect the human freedom index to match your preferred standards; then collide that civilization with the one that is becoming ‘too privileged’ or a civilization that seldom favours your political, social or economic outlook – especially if you’re a corporately run government with the worker civilian as your preferred labourer of choice.

It is all part of a long-winded series on cultural Marxism that I dare not divulge into right now, it is the treasure trove of modern globalist plutocracies that seek to retain the fruits of the renaissance: Science, technology, but dispossess the progressive cultural outlooks that came hand in hand with such revolutions and ‘re-thinking’ – as the French revolution & the American revolutions which championed the people over the powers that be.

---

They essentially want to return humanity to a medieval serfdom of sorts, to give themselves priority, to replace us wherever possible with alternatives; decadent, poor, the third world, third class cultures come to fit their role perfectly; high work, low pay – and accustomed to a working class lifestyle, and low freedoms. This dastardly role they smother in sweet words like ‘co-existence, multiculturalism, diversification’, all unfortunately intentionally short-sighted, negligent of the elephant in the room – cultural Marxism; that eastern cultures will 100% pollute the west’s in little to no time, it will go rapidly from free-market capitalism, to socialism, to a form of communism. But if you dare point out the obvious you will be slandered as a racist, Xenophobic, or Islamophobic, all of which are used to dismiss critical thinking in regards to the dodgy geopolitical shifts currently happening.

• It is important to remember, on topics such as this, that political correctness is an invention that came from the Rothschild-funded School of Frankfurt, and that if often is used to suppress truth tellers and, in true Orwellian style, limit that scope of acceptable opinion and speech.

---

It is no mistake that the Rothschilds and their counterparts seek to integrate a cultural condition that favors a working class and a totalitarian, overarching ruling class. That of course means the eradication of the middle class as we know it by means of destroying the value systems built by the blood, sweat and tears of white Europeans; this perception of whites and their successful capitalistic homeland must be eliminated according to the Globalists.

The white skin tone is heavily associated with privilege, opulence and western values/faith. By ostracizing the white identity and assimilating us with the values associated with darker skin/regressive eastern culture we have cultural-Marxism working perfectly. The shallow racism card prevents us from discussing this topic openly, unfortunately. We must be ashamed of ‘slavery’ and ‘apologize’ by blindly accepting the third worlders’ blatantly intolerant, failed, socialistic cultures that got them deprived of individual liberties to begin with. Sooner or later they will deprive us, too.

The globalists want conformist workers, not freedom, God loving individuals.

It’s one thing integrating third-world migrants into western cultural ways via slow and steady assimilation, but instantaneous, rushed mass-migration policies utterly blows apart the native culture of the host country:

• Mass migration refers to the migration of large groups of people from one geographical area to another. Mass migration is distinguished from individual or small scale migration; and also from seasonal migration, which may occur on a regular basis.

“Immigration can work well when the receiving or destination country has time to review exactly who is passing through its gates, and has some say in how many and what type of people. It works out much better when migrants blend in and assimilate to their new nation, by learning the language and adopting some or most of the new culture. If they resist doing this, you end up getting pockets of separate ethnicities and nationalities within a larger country, less social cohesion, and a less connected and integrated society. In worst case scenarios, you end up with massive in-fighting and groups trying to impose their religious, cultural or political beliefs on other groups, by force if necessary.” – Freedom Articles

Balkanization is a geopolitical technique being currently used in the middle east to divide and subjugate the near-east states, into smaller, weaker targets for Globalist expansionism via Israel. It’s now also being used against the countries of the progressive, constitutional, Christian west with internal, cultural balkanisation/cultural Marxism. This mass migration policy is generating nations-within-nations, cultures within cultures – to create diversity yes, but this diversity of dramatically differentiating opinions and worldviews will ultimately spark the end of liberty, democracy and human rights – especially as the new dominant eastern culture spreads faster than its ever-more infertile,  bloated, and aged western counterpart.

Democracy is already effectively dead, the Globalists now just want a docile, regressive workforce that will give up on liberty-giving western values, and our constitution, and even better – actively vote in socialist policies to cut away at individual liberties and grow the governing body.

…And all it takes is a brief look into our damning history with mass migration & Islam, or just Islam/eastern cultures in general:

• India
  The partition of British India in 1947 into Muslim-majority Pakistan and Hindu-majority India led to one of the largest mass migrations in history.The break-up along religious lines resulted in the movement of about 14.5 million people – Muslims going to Pakistan from India and Hindus and Sikhs going in the opposite direction.
  
  The consequences were in many cases disastrous, with the governments being unprepared for such massive social upheaval: law and order broke down and huge violence sparked off on both sides of the border causing between 200,000 and up to a million casualties, around 12 million people left homeless and thousands were raped.

• Bosnia-HerzegovinaIt used to be part of a country in the Balkans called Yugoslavia which was made up of six different regions, including Serbia and Croatia. From 1991, Yugoslavia began to disintegrate. The majority of people living in Bosnia were ethnic Christian Bosnians, but there were also Bosnian Serbs and Bosnian Croats who were both Christian. In addition there were also Bosnian Muslims. 

  

  Now the white ethnicity threatens Globalist power, as the ethnicity most closely associated with liberties.

  Bosnia-Herzegovina declared independence in 1992. However, the Bosnian Serb population saw their future as being joined with Serbia, now an independent neighbouring state. A civil war began during which the Serbs isolated Bosnian Muslims and started exterminating them.

---

Take a look at where the migrants are coming from in terms of freedom:

It is evident that the migrants of low freedom zones are being taken in mass to the high freedom zone (Europe), and thus gradually, unwittingly subjugating the ‘freedom’ in the said zone by means of ideological differentiation. And a preconceived valuation of the government as the assumed overlord.

HDI (Human Development Index):

Take note, it is not just Syrian refugees getting in, it is many economic migrants from Northern Africa, the near east and beyond, all of which regionally holds a generally lower HDI, and a likely more limited understanding of politics than the west – these migrants will favour bigger government, not knowing the implications. In a previous article I already covered the inherently lower IQ of people from the source regions.

These migrants are poor, hungry, uneducated and essentially desperate for a new home – they will easily accept the governments that take them in; their concerns are more rudimentary than ours. These people have been oppressed and beaten down by war, or are simply hungry for a better way of life irregardless of whether a tyrant rules that supposed better life, they will use the excuse of ‘refugee’ to get here – and they will trample western generosities & liberties for free welfare and comfort, in exchange they will work long hours for pitifully little and sell themselves and their liberty for precious little, that seems a whole lot more, in contrast, to them as opposed to where they came from.

• If you import this desperation en mass, you can shave away individual liberties with the claim that a third world culture doesn’t ‘want’ these liberties via mob-rule democracy, that favours the majority irregardless of whether the policy is at all right.

• The reality is, that they (the 3rd world migrants) are jet-lagged from regressive eastern, third world ways that have held them back from even thinking about limiting their government, or upholding a constitution – why? Because they never have had a constitution or much freedom, period. They’re centuries behind western civilization in terms of society, infrastructure, politics and culture.

• With a melting pot of new immigrants, it is far easier for the controllers of that society to push through restrictive legislation, because it is less likely to be opposed by new people who are still familiarizing themselves with the cultural and legal norms of that society. It also provides the controllers with a bigger pool of people likely to vote to increase the size of Government (e.g. for more State welfare) and a bigger pool of cheap labor.

---

Makes sense they will accept serfdom, right?

Who’s more likely to accept this? A well educated, relatively wealthy, well cultured western person, or an uneducated, not wealthy, poorly cultured eastern person? The answer is simple.

“The migration of populations is another key part of the overall op. For example, in Europe, the plan involves bringing in, quickly, so many people that communities are overwhelmed, and traditions and customs are swamped and lost. In other words, create a single de facto European population that dissolves all borders and differences.

Of course, this outcome is heralded as the triumph of equality, but that is a sham. That is the cover story. Mass migration has nothing to do with that.” – John Rappoport, Infowars

These handicapped migrants have political value, taking advantage of their nescience/inadvertent ignorance of political spheres is a primed faucet for exploitation by power-hungry globalists hiding behind the far-reaching tendrils of masquerading-to-be-free western governments.

This is not about diversity, this is about instilling Muslim/near-eastern ideologies, which are naturally constricting every faucet of open, liberty-oriented western society. Just look at how limited Saudi Arabia is, then think the same in Britain if enough intolerant members of Islam hold sway in the UK.

---

Greater Israel, the globalist goal.

Besides the ‘collateral’ slaughter of hundreds of thousands in the middle east, and the trampling, destabilization, and balkanisation of other significant near-east countries that disagree with Israel, i.e. Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan and Afghanistan – the migration issue persists beyond that; actually sapping these near east countries of their workforce and natives. Will the native Palestinians then stop speaking out against Israel if they are offered the fruits of the west? Most will, I guarantee.

---

An invasion of huge proportions…

---

Forced, sudden, uncontrolled mass migration is not a celebration of diversity. It’s a deliberate attempt by world NWO manipulators to undermine certain nations and societies.

• How can ‘multiculturalism’ be a celebration of diversity, when the sheer scale of migration is creating enclaves of separate groups of people, divided by colour, faith and creed? Of course, there are success stories of integration. However, mass migration policies, not seasonal/gradual ones, are ripping apart what little integration had taken place. It sweeps away western fundamental values; this open-doors policy is a self-afflicted wound that so many are blindly supporting from an emotional & liberal standpoint. From the surface this looks benevolent, but in a deeper understanding, it is unmistakably destructive for western ways.

---

Conclusion: We Can Only Unite if We Respect Our Individual and Cultural Differences

People knowingly and willingly coming together is a wonderful thing – but only if done with free will, in a way that still respects their inherent individual and cultural differences. There is a way the world can unite in respect, with admiration for our differences. The NWO agenda is all about the centralization of peoples and nations – of power – through force and coercion, and in a way which tramples upon and disregards the uniqueness of people and cultures. It is all about smashing down people to a certain level, boxing them into certain rigid beliefs and rules, and standardizing and homogenizing them like little cartons of milk so they are more easy to manage and exploit.

A One World Government based on this kind of coercion and homogenization will never work, because within each person lies the spirit of freedom, which demands to be given free choice, and calls out to be honored and respected for what it is. However, it is up to each of us to fully activate that spirit, because the degree to which we do not is the degree to which we allow worldwide tyranny to flourish.

Weaponized Genetics

The migrant waves are coming in their vast swathes, unquestioned, unhindered, permitted by EU bogged countries, pinned down by Schengen, all resistors ostracized by Soros’ political correctness, the EUs nagging sanctions and tariffs. All to accept vast crowds of migrants generated by a US funded terrorist group called ISIS that sustains a war to generate money, seize natural resources, generate extremists, and pressure Russia, the only state to successfully near-eradicate ISIS, despite hypocritical criticism from Washington, and microagressive actions such as the Turkey (NATO allied) shooting of a Russian Jet, and the US funded Ukraine uprising.

I’m racist for not tolerating this? They bring down our trust in all migrants, they give a good reason to vote Trump who advocates checking newcomers first.

The newcomers who are running into the arms of their perceived enemies, after all – we did advocate the clumsy drone bombing of their homesteads, described by Obama as ‘collateral damage’ (an excuse to open the borders to everyone) where we all truly understand that this was his agenda all along; make the natives dependent on the West, the very West (of liberty, peace etc) that Obama and the New World Order (NWO) want to destroy in wake of their culturally Marxist aim to impose a communist bloc of dumb, docile citizens (slaves), the USSR was honestly just a test run…

---

But let’s talk about the genetically, culturally and ideologically regressive group of people that are arriving for permanent residence by means of mass immigration, all political correctness aside for one moment, if you can handle it. Let’s talk science, straight facts.

Source

Dysgenics, or genetic decline by means of inbreeding in the huge family culture of the middle east has probably shaved a good many IQ points from the average Joe, or Muhammad over time. A poor literacy rate/regressive, intolerant culture might not be conducive to good IQ or intellectualism either, for that matter.

The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country.

The Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.

It’s evident from this graph that the general IQ is lower for colored peoples, however that is subject to many variables, and not to be taken definitively whatsoever.

---

• The intention of the Globalists is to interbreed the lower IQ (caused by many variables that I cannot definitively attribute) with the Caucasian westerners, as to genetically disaffect them, and ultimately subjugate them. They’re aware this cannot happen immediately, and will be gradual – soon enough whites will be a minority in their own countries, and eventually will become fully interbred with the Arabs/northern Africans.

  

  As you can see, all the places that we are getting migrants from are renowned for their inbreeding tendencies as a result of consanguineous marriage. The genetic quality is consequently disaffected (proven to negatively affect IQ), and that’s a fact.

• The interbreeding of cultures is also a potent target for globalist exploitation, the progressive western cultures will be bent to the will of the Islamic/eastern culture, which is intolerant and generally much, much less concerned by constitutionalism, and not at all acclimatized to the standard of free speech.

---

---

Epigenetics is another topic for another day, but tying it into eastern/middle eastern culture we can draw out how Epigenetics are negatively affecting us, an intolerant culture being forced upon a Christian/tolerant west will no doubt reduce our liberty, and acclimatization to liberty.

• Islamic and middle eastern ideology is based on control; i.e. heavy patriarchy and elitism far beyond that of the west, as described in the above video this will be reflected on western society if mass immigration is followed through and allowed to continue. It is a deadly seed raring to fester.

---

 

The Bees are Dying

Bees, the planet’s prime pollinators are dying off at unprecedented rates. Once they’re gone, it is predicted by renowned scientist Albert Einstein that we’ll have at maximum, four years before humanity is rendered extinct by starvation. Provided we don’t have any technological alternatives to pollinate crops, the implications regardless of this – mass death and suffering…

• They are critical pollinators: they pollinate 70 of the around 100 crop species that feed 90% of the world.

---

 

Paraphrased quote from Albert Einstein.

---

 

What is killing the bees?

Source

Summarized reasons for massive bee deaths. What is misses is the HAARP program, which I will get onto later.

The Varroa destructor, a type of mite found to be highly resistant to the insecticides that US beekeepers have used in attempts to control the mites from inside the beehives. It is allegedly the parasitical pest culpable for spreading disease to the honeybee population (Varroa destructor can only reproduce in a honey bee colony), and implicating in the last half decade alone, 30% of the national bee population having disappeared and nearly a third of all bee colonies in the U.S. having utterly perished.

Varroa destructor on a honeybee.

In a vicious cycle, since 1987 when the Varroa mite was first discovered in the US, Monsanto, Dow, Bayer and other large chemical manufacturers aggressively imposed themselves onto the bee industry, selling genetically modified insecticides and herbicides as the quick and easy ‘fix’ to remedy the parasitic invasion, only to weaken the bees’ natural genetic defenses to fight off the parasite — GlobalResearch.ca

Monsanto has produced an insecticide called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which once ingested by bees, binds to receptors within the bee’s stomach lining that keeps the bee from eating. Of course this weakens the bee, causing the breakdown of the inner stomach wall, which in turn makes the bee susceptible to spores and bacteria.

To further compound the problem, for years the lobbying power of the chemical giant denied causing damage to the bee’s internal immune capacity for resistance to parasites, which of course only continued to kill off the bee population worldwide. Thus, continued chemical use, especially in America, only exacerbates this growing problem — GlobalResearch.ca

---

Neonicotinoids

A type of insecticide called neonicotinoids, is known to cause acute and chronic poisoning not just of one bee, but the entire colony. Bees take the contaminated nectar and pollen spread through the plant’s DNA back to the hive, creating a highly toxic living environment for all the bees. Toxicity builds up destroying the Central Nervous System, causing further disorientation and bees ultimately can neither fly nor make it back to the nest.

…Meanwhile, unlike the US, in Europe and Australia where the health of insects and humans is deemed more important than corporate profit, laws banning insecticide use have been passed, which in large part has largely saved the bee populations from being so decimated there.

---

 

But here’s the real killer factor…

A study last year found 35 pesticides and fungicides, some at lethal doses, in the pollen collected from bees that were used to pollinate food crops in five U.S. states. In another research study, bees that contacted pollen contaminated with fungicides ended up three times more likely to get infected by a parasite closely associated with Colony Collapse Disorder.

---

 

High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)

Also known as:

–    Maize syrup
–    Glucose syrup
–    Glucose/fructose syrup
–    Tapioca syrup
–    Dahlia syrup
–    Fruit fructose
–    Crystalline fructose

Another probable factor in America is the widespread use of feeding bee colonies with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) instead of its natural self-made food honey. For maximum profit, industrialized US bee farms utilize maximum honey yields, not leaving any honey for the bees to consume during the long colder winter months. It is speculated that the natural hormonal and enzyme effects interacting with honey’s natural nutritional advantages provided bees with the increased defenses that historically have been effective in fighting off parasitic threats and viruses. In contrast, the artificially processed HFCS is believe to weaken the immune system of the honeybees’ genetic strength to ward off disease.

---

 

**Aluminium sprayed in the Air (HAARP Program)**

Academics Now Recognize Aluminum as Key Potential Cause of Bee Decline

A new study published June 4, 2015 exposes aluminum as a factor in bee decline. This study makes a few shockingly-honest statements.

The first statement:

“While recent attention has focused upon pesticides, other environmental pollutants have largely been ignored.”

I believe aluminum testing has been intentionally ignored in the corporate-controlled academic community specifically to prevent bringing attention to the ongoing aluminum-aerosol spraying campaign.

The second statement:

“Aluminum is the most significant environmental contaminant of recent times…”

Finally, honest academics—who are not controlled by establishment banker/industrialists—admit that aluminum is a new and significant problem.

Where is all this new aluminum contamination coming from? All evidence points to ongoing aerosol spray programs being performed in numerous countries worldwide.

It has been my position all along that aluminum is now the primary cause of insect decline. The unprecedented spraying of very fine aluminum powder has decimated insect populations and has facilitated animal die-offs and the sudden rise of lung cancer to the position of #3 killer of humans despite smoking being at an all-time low.

---

 

It’s intentional

A small group of rich banking families intend to reduce the earth’s population by some 90%, and centralize the world’s food supply, their depopulation aims are boldly stated on the controversial Georgia Guidestones, observe:

---

 

…Via the elimination of the vital honeybee pollinators, that allow for the global food supply to stay afloat, these New World Order banking families will be able to hide in the shadows and blame ‘global warming’ for the death of the honeybees, after of course – Billions of people die across the globe due to starvation.

Monsanto/Globalist scientists will of course, unveil pre-developed technology to pollinate after the mass deaths of billions (esp. in third world), and emerge as the saviours of what would have been our extinction. Their technology will win over the remaining populations’ trust and will exalt the Monsanto/Globalists as supreme, they will decide who eats, who starves and so on, all the while the honeybee will be extinct and nobody will have the financial means to afford their own pollination tech, apart from the rich corporations.

• It makes even more sense when the elite hold a likely satanic ‘cremation of care‘ event every year, it’s obvious what they’re doing requires a ritualistic ceremony to purge themselves of any remnants of empathy within them.

Video

---

 

Anti-Cancer substance called CAPE in beehives

(Another reason for the globalists/big pharma to eradicate honeybees?)

A six-week study on mice has led U of C researchers to believe that there may be potential anti-cancer qualities in the compound bees use to maintain their hives.

The compound, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, or “CAPE”, inhibits cancer cell proliferation by hindering the cells’ ability to sense nutrition necessary for tumor growth. Unlike most healthy cells, cancer cells use all of the nutrition available to them, even when traditional cues would say they do not need it.

Big-pharma makes billions off the cancer industry, the incentive to slip toxic pesticides into the fray to damage both our health and those of bees is supported wholeheartedly by motive, especially in the context of the New World Order and Agenda 21.

Herbal remedies to cancer, such as CAPE, are becoming increasingly attractive as safer and more holistic replacements to radiation and chemotherapy.

---

“Our hope is that these natural kinds of products might be different than a standard pharmaceutical treatment because we’re not targeting a specific molecule,” said Jones.

• Other proven anti-cancer agents such as the harmless cannabis plant have also been needlessly suppressed, honey is just another notch on big-pharmas/Globalists list of targets.

It seems to me that suppressing bees is yet another tyrannical, Globalist move for ultimate world domination. I urge you to take action as I am.

---

 

You’re Being Lied to About Cancer

Cancer is quite lucrative for Big Pharma with over $200 billion dollars spent every year on chemotherapy, radiation, surgeries, medications, etc.

Doctors push these expensive and questionable treatments on cancer patients while largely ignoring the many major concerns of treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. These “treatments” pose many dire side effects, the most concerning of which is the development of secondary cancers. Research proves that secondary cancers will likely return in a different location with far more aggression than the original cancer.

For those that survive these radically invasive treatments, permanent damage to the kidneys, heart and brain can pretty much be guaranteed. Survivors often deal with heart-breaking infertility, as well as chronic pain.

In addition, there are countless lies told to the public in a vicious quest for profit by pharmaceutical companies and the medical industry.

For example, the mammogram industry rakes in $4 billion dollars a year, tricking women in to believing an x-ray is necessary to protect health. What doctors fail to mention is that mammograms are not only ineffective, but actually quite harmful.

A study conducted by the Nordic Cochrane Center in Demark reviewed the effects of seven breast cancer screening options on half a million women. The results are horrifying: For every 2,000 women who received a mammogram within a 10 year period, only one would have her life prolonged, while 10 others were harmed. Mammograms irradiate breast tissue cells, triggering the development of breast cancer. And once a woman is diagnosed with breast cancer, doctors will push chemotherapy as an effective treatment despite the fact that there is zero, reliable scientific data to prove that chemotherapy has any positive effect on fighting breast cancer.

The American Cancer Society admits how deadly cancer treatments, specifically chemotherapy, can be. The ACS has stated that if a cancer returns, even as a totally different type from the original cancer, it may have been caused by the initial treatment.

“Chemo is known to be a greater risk factor than radiation therapy in causing leukemia…some solid tumor cancers have also been linked to chemo treatment.”

The truth is chemotherapy does not work and is nothing more than medical fraud. Radiation causes cancer, and usually a more aggressive one at that.

It’s true that lots of money has been spent on evidence proving that chemotherapy shrinks tumors. It’s unfortunate that this fact means nothing. What doctors don’t tell their patients is that tumor size is completely irrelevant in battling the disease. Tumor reduction does absolutely nothing to change the physiology of a cancer patient’s body. Reducing the size of the tumor does nothing towards healing or creating a cancer-free environment.

Cancer will kill over 8 million people this year.

True cures are being suppressed and the mainstream media has played a big role in keeping people in the dark on how to prevent such a dire diagnosis.

An explosively powerful documentary series is about to play online, and it will be free to view for a limited time. This is something ‘they’ do not want you to see! Although the landmark documentary features interviews with many of the world’s leading cancer experts, the mainstream media refused to air it. Pharmaceutical companies are one of MSM’s biggest sources of income, so you can imagine why you haven’t heard anything about this series on television. You’ll discover the most effective ways to prevent and beat cancer you won’t see any where else.

This documentary series has already saved numerous lives.

Each episode in the 9 part series is packed full of incredible information, survivor stories and much more in the pursuit to finally find a cure and eradicate cancer.

Please don’t miss this amazing opportunity to learn The Truth About Cancer. Sign up to see this incredible series for free here. It could save your life.

The Truth About Cancer can be viewed by clicking here.

Trump: “Punish Abortion”

Donald J. Trump, GOP running Presidential candidate in recent political altercations  controversially suggested punishing women for having abortions. Even despite him retracting his statement, and placing the blame on doctors for carrying out the procedure and providing the materials necessary; his claim that abortion ought to be punished in some manner remains somewhat reasonable.

Here’s why it might make sense:

1. Sanctity Argument: Life should be regarded as sacred, therefore potential life outside the womb does not justify murdering the fetus during its in-utero development.
2. There’s never a legible reason for ending life: In the situation of rape, exclusions may be possible. However, in all other situations the choice to exterminate life due to financial reasons etcetera, with the option of adoption always on the cards pushes the necessity to end life out of any sort of proportion.
3. Bad choices don’t ever give you the right to kill or participate in killing: often accidental pregnancies occur in a drunken haze, and may even be used as a reason to ejaculate in someone and then get away scott-free. Trumps’ new suggestion, granted only punishes one half of the party, but still holds the woman accountable for allowing herself to be placed in that situation.
4. It discourages people seeing life as dispensable, and might culture healthier views on already born humans: It only makes sense, considering that pro-life views are being diminished in the contemporary world, with our collective capacity for empathy being systematically tried and tested each month, and our tendency to take to the streets to protest against ongoing war being no longer as strong as it was in the yesteryears, i.e. Vietnam anybody? We can only attribute this move as Trump trying to instill some more empathy into our increasingly cold, non-affectionate society. If we think about the war, with third world people being dehumanized everyday, millions of deaths becoming nothing more than a statistic – I believe we need to start with humanizing fetuses, only then will we really begin to grasp foreign policy as a bloodied, unjust affair.
5. Sex is to reproduce, not purely for recreational use, if you conceive without contraception; then you follow through with that childbirth: People are increasingly misconstruing sexual intercourse the way they see fit. Punishments for abortion discourage unnecessary death and encourage contraceptive measures, and not just hoping you don’t conceive in the name of recreational (immoral) intercourse – which has an inherent margin for error that people just override as a ‘mistake’.
6. It’s not your ‘own body’ when you’re producing a new body: Pro-choicers often cite the argument of ‘it’s x person’s own body’ when it truly is not. A fetus is the beginnings of a new person, suspended in amniotic fluid, and certainly not an appendage of the mother whatsoever – logically this means you cannot end that fetus’s life without being culpable of murder as that fetus is a body in itself.
7. Big-Pharma love profitable abortions: the death of fetuses is tremendously profitable, the morning after pill is being sold at an ever more dramatic level as more and more irresponsible teens assume that they can be reckless with contraception (and life!) with this pill as their backup plan. Why allow the death of innocents fuel an industry? The pill should never be an incentive to be reckless, only a tool to be used in absolute necessity.

---