Some people have defended President Obama’s statement by pointing to the word “frequency.” But, even if one puts it in terms of frequency, the president’s statement is still false, with the US ranking 12th compared to European countries.
Legal guns or no legal guns, the ongoing deaths from mass shootings will still occur, taking away guns from the people puts everyone who abides the law at risk, and vulnerable to criminals and terrorists who will take this as a ripe opportunity to enforce their crimes and massacres with firearms; without the due deterrence of an armed citizenry to stop them, relying on the authorities in the heat of a shooting is not going to save anyone, it takes seconds to carry out a mass shooting, we need people to carry firearms.
The media has wholeheartedly cherry picked the most severe mass-shootings to push a disarmament agenda, they know full well guns cannot ever be somehow magically ‘wished away’ with a liberal mindset and a few palliative laws passed. They blame the tools and not the ideologies, the bullets and not the fingers pulling the triggers.
This just says it all, armed crime will surge if guns are banned/restricted, and then what?
Guns do more to save lives than they do to take them maliciously. Do not let the media suggest otherwise with the spotlight constantly shone on the times where guns were not used, and people died – it’s media cherrypicking. The Orlando massacre was encouraged by the fact nightclubs like Pulse do not permit gun carriers, the shooter was only taken out when he was shot by law enforcement – but this tragedy could have been avoided or reduced if a civilian had killed the terrorist earlier on with a carry-permitted gun.
As you can see, non-firearm homicides are more prolific, yet they do not gain the media coverage that firearm homicides do – this proves to an extent, that the government want to take away firearms as a means of controlling the people, its not about saving anyone – because without firearms, there will be more death.
If anything, these mass shootings are epithets of an ailed, decaying set of moral standards in a given society. Because twisted people will always exist, there will always be murder-sprees (Jack the Ripper anyone?) – even without any guns (not possible), terrorists will find a way to slaughter, and criminals find a way to advantageously kill for their living, which is simply (a telling sign of an ill society where people need to steal, and people need to commit acts of terror to prove something). Fix the ill minded, impose more background checks, but don’t take away guns – they are the people’s safeguard.
All of the killers had been on some form of drug, the most common being antidepressants such as Prozac.
Killers including Adam Lanza of Sandy Hook, Reno Hospital shooter Alan Oliver Frazier, Aurora movie theater shooter James Holmes, Columbine mass-killer Eric Harris, Patrick Purdy who went on a schoolyard shooting rampage in Stockton, California, Jose Reyes the Nevada seventh-grader who went on a shooting rampage at his school, Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis – the list goes on.
But this drug issue is not unique to America, mass-murderer Anders Breivik had also been on SSRIs such as Fluoxetine that are in antidepressants when he committed the mass shooting at Utoya Island in 2011.
The Radical Islam Problem
Radical Islam is also a prevalent causer of mass-shootings and terrorism, prompting – in alignment with radical Islamic doctrine, for the assailant to kill and maim the non-believers, the Qu’ran advocates this under Jihad. Most terrorist attacks in the west today are done under some faculty of radical Islamic ideology.
In the middle east, many extremely radicalized Islamic states still support capital punishment for gays, on average 53% of all Muslims in western countries still believe it should not be legal to be gay, we need to recognize that the views of near-east Islam are still severely distorted; and unfortunately liberal leftists still think that leaving these people unintegrated when brought in en masse via migratory policies is going to be safe for the USA, and somehow liberalism & political correctness is the excuse to allow this to all happen, but multiculturalism does not work – Europe is living proof of this.
If you soften up the pro-western sentiment in the USA, you can with relative ease slip in hundreds of thousands of pro-Muslim migrants who will never integrate and will sway the vote in favour of Islamic ways and customs – and vote in bigger government in the process.
By not integrating mass migration influxes, the West is setting itself up to be usurped by intolerance, by taking away guns the West is opening its doors to Islamic radical terrorism which will always have guns. When will people see this? Giving the guns to the state shifts dependency to the state and creates an atmosphere of fear and defenselessness, the state is never going to be everywhere to respond immediately to a terrorist attack, gun ‘control’ makes the job of the NWO elite easier to pull the strings in regards to bring in migrants, change the USA culturally for the worse, and then use law enforcement who have the guns to enforce their agenda when things become heated in the Islamic takeover phase – this basically assures the people will be helpless in holding any power in the future, the government will literally call the shots.
Do you see the kind of mentality America (and Europe) is importing with mass immigration? Not integrating this is going to cause conflict, I guarantee it.
But the media is somehow still claiming criminals and terrorists can be magically removed or reduced upon the reduction of arms, a correlation that will never, ever work, ever – there will always be people determined to commit crimes and acts of terror, for example; the US government tried to stop the drugs trade by making certain drugs illegal, this only worsened the issue, the same will apply to gun ownership which just surges after every shooting – the black market and its customers don’t care about US gun control law whatsoever.
Refer to this link for a larger image of the one below, and this link for more revealing stats on the truth behind gun crime and the misleading media emphasis it has gotten.
The CPRC has also collected data on the worst mass public shootings, those cases where at least 15 people were killed in the attack.
There were 16 cases where at least 15 people were killed. Out of those cases, four were in the United States, two in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.
But the U.S. has a population four times greater than Germany’s and five times the U.K.’s, so on a per-capita basis the U.S. ranks low in comparison — actually, those two countries would have had a frequency of attacks 1.96 (Germany) and 2.46 (UK) times higher.
Small countries such as Norway, Israel and Australia may have only one major attack each, one-fourth of what the U.S. has suffered, but the US population is vastly greater. If they suffered attacks at a rate adjusted for their population, Norway, Israel and Australia would have had attacks that were respectively 16, 11, and 3 times greater than the US.
Proportionally, western countries, taken into account population, have similar homicide rates.
The common Zionist defense of the Israeli authorities to authenticate their tyrannical establishment is that their state is somehow Biblical, this article seeks to question and debunk this ill-informed notion that their corrupted rabbinical, Zionist form of Judaism is somehow a special treatment worthy, specially entitled group of people that deserve compensation for the tragedy of the Holocaust, except this forgets that Judaism is not genetic, it is a faith – so the real motive must be statism; to merge Judaism with statism, to redefine our concept of what Judaism actually is, this will undermine true Judaism, and is concurrent with the best interests of the Satanic,Zionist, Babylonian, one-world globalist agenda, because that’s what it unequivocally is.
Zionists want to eliminate the Opiate, at the core of this Opiate lies the true Yahushaic Judaism the true founder of Abrahamic faith, the paragon of light and all things holy & righteous. That is what they want to eradicate in every way possible, this means destroying Islam & Christianity too to wipe clean even the faiths that aren’t quite the true faith, but on the right tracks & uphold/support values of true Judaism (Not Zionism).
The Rothschilds funded the early settlers from Europe to relocate in post-war Palestine and they also funded and armed the terrorist groups, like Irgun, which bombed and terrorised Israel into existence in 1948, a campaign which forced 800,000 Palestinians to leave the land of their birth.
The fact is, Israel in itself misrepresents Judaism as an arrogantly exclusive faith reserved only for a nationalistic, ethnic group, that is not what Judaism is, we are all members of the twelve tribes of Israel; soa contrived, corrupted nation doesn’t do justice to a worldwide faith, and is certainly not the Israeli kingdom discussed in the Bible.
“The religious Jews who by virtue of their faith, clearly contradicted Zionist nationalism, and who had lived peacefully with their Arab neighbors for generations, became unwillingly identified with the Zionist cause and their struggle with the Arabs.”
A so called ‘Jewish’ state that claims to represent this uncanny religious exclusivity only serves to push people away from Judaism, and towards a backwards us against them concept of religious-nationalistic possessiveness, and to ultimately foment a greater hatred between Islam and the Judeo-Christian West.
True Judaism doesn’t ever pride itself with smugly insular nationalistic & ethnic identifications which hold no weight anywhere in the only two true texts; the Torah or Bible, but instead true Judaism embraces differences between people with love and acceptance, even if others do not align with Jewish ways akin to the Torah and Bible, not the false rabbinical Talmud, or Zionist doctrine which is not inspired text at all.
In a stunning and remarkable moment, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared to the people of Europe and the world that the prophecies of Ezekiel 37 have been fulfilled. The Holocaust, he said, represented the “dry bones” and “graves” of the Jewish people, and out of that horror the State of Israel was resurrected, just as the Lord said would happen through the Hebrew Prophet Ezekiel. Rarely has any world leader given a major address on an international stage declaring End Times prophecies from the Bible have come true. But that is exactly what Netanyahu did.
“Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.”
– Ezekiel 37:12
This Bible passage states so very clearly that God’s people (all of us who believe in the unaltered Torah & Bible) will be returned to the land of Israel (The entire world, unified) in the after-Kingdom when we are literally raised from the dead, this is not at all the same with the present day Zionism movement, in which Netanyahu cited the Holocaust as the equivalent for end-times prophesy. Where does being raised from the dead come into using the Holocaust to create a ‘Jewish’ state? We must take the word literally or not at all.
Important: The borders of Israel are the subject of heated international debate, but a look at prophetic literature shows a clear and surprising picture: the Messianic age will feature an Israel that encompasses the entire world. Haters of Israel can interpret this in a negative light, but the truth is a Utopian vision of universal brotherhood.
As I’ve discussed, Zionism, biblically speaking, is in no way connected with the Jews in the Holy Bible, it was invented by the Rothschild Banking Family.
As you can see above the Satanically associated hexagram ‘Star of David’ which appears on the poles of Jupiter, which is associated with Satan. This evil mark appears on the Rothschild shield above, and also on the flag of Israel – a coincidence? It is definitely not.
Israel is simply the State of Rothschild and how appropriate that they paid for the construction of the Israeli parliament building, the Knesset, and the Israel Supreme Court. The name Rothschild means Red-shield and it originates with the red shield ‘Star of David’ symbol (not a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds) which they displayed on their house in Frankfurt …
Today, Satan-controlled Jesuit, Jew hating, Rothschild-Illuminati fronts like the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs, and others, still answer to the Round Table which string-pulls and coordinates from the shadows. This is why Zionists in government are invariably connected with these Rothschild-controlled organisations.
When we see the extraordinary number of Zionists in key positions around the world we are looking not at ‘manipulating Jews’, but manipulating Zionists representing the interests and demands of the Rothschilds. Jews are not the problem, Zionists are.
An average $3 billion a year is handed to the State of Rothschild (Israel) as a result of decisions made by American administrations that are always, ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’, controlled by the Rothschilds. One hand of the network hands over the cash to another.
This explains why the United States never talks about the arsenal of nuclear weapons stockpiled by one of the world’s most trigger-happy states. Israel refuses to discuss them and the American policy, recently reconfirmed by Obama, is never to ask or bring up the subject.
Zionism does not accurately represent Judaism in any way, as above suggests that Zionism is the worm inside Judaism, eating it from inside to out. It masquerades as Judaism, as a force of good – but it definitely is not.
Significant numbers of Jewish people are not Zionists and oppose that appalling creed while many Zionists are not Jewish. These include the Christian Zionists and Obama’s vice-president, Joe Biden, who told Israeli television ‘I’m a Zionist’. If, as Biden rightly says, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, how can it be a racial rather than a political movement? It can’t be, as I’ve stated above. It’s just made to appear like that to manipulate public perception because opposing Zionism then becomes opposing Jewish people as a whole and the ‘you’re a racist’ card can be played over and over. It undermines Judaism and solidifies the state of Israel for political motives that want to destroy the Abrahamic Judaism, Christianity and Islam by pitching them against each-other.
The Zionist Campaign for the revealing of Satan himself
Read this article for a more fleshed-out perspective: Link
The campaign to impose a Rothschild fiefdom in Palestine goes back at least to the earlier part of the 19th century and probably long before. It was given a massive boost with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 when the British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour declared in a letter his government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine.
This letter was sent by Balfour, an inner-circle member of an elite secret society called the Round Table, to Baron (Walter) Rothschild who funded the Round Table.
Now is the most important part of this article, and likely the most important thing I’ve ever communicated in my writings, pay attention.
The last two US administrations are testament to the extent of Zionist (Rothschild) control of America and thus its foreign policy, not least with regard to Iraq, the former land of Sumer and Babylon, which according to some just happens to be part of the ‘Greater Israel’ that the Zionists seek to secure.
They do this by slaughtering the native people in Gaza and Palestine, flushing out natives into the EU with welfare incentives to give up their homeland, initiating perpetual war to destroy facilities, homesteads and infrastructure that enables a native population to survive; claiming this as ‘collateral’ damage in the US fight against the imaginary ISIS which is emptying & hollowing out the countries for Israel to occupy, yet ISIS is really a joint-funded, CIA trained operation with Saudi Arabia to give an excuse for proxy imperialism. Israel also frames the Palestinians as perpetrators of aggravating borders to then authenticate Israeli missile bombardment and justify expansionism, all of this is to ultimately establish a greater Zionist-Satanic Israel reinforced by Holocaust guilt and political correctness of the West.
In a spiritual context; and you must take spirituality under Yahuah seriously in order to realize the reason for Israel’s Zionist creation is not a doing of man, but of Satan himself (Ha-Satan is traditionally translated as “the accuser” or “the adversary”), this is not solely motivated by a desire to challenge Russia and the East, or even just for controlling resources; the final Great Deception is that the Antichrist (False Messiah) will come before Yahusha, the one true Messiah, returns. The False Messiah will stand in the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem (in Israel), showing himself that he is God, this will cause many to be deceived in Satan’s last ditch attempt to win over the people to his dark clutches, before Yahusha returns.
Satan is not coming with “horns and hoofs” and a “pitchfork” no, he will appear as “an angel of light” He will appear to be a very righteous and Godly man, a great man of peace, who will be championing the cause of Israel in the world courts, demanding that they be given the right to rebuild their temple (which he plans to sit in and rule from), and that they should be given the right to re-start their animal sacrifices once again, which are not necessary as Yahusha sacrificed himself for us – those who know the scriptures thoroughly will know that this is a deception.
Satan’s new world order is coming, do not try to stop it, let God do the avenging, and do not fear death; it happened before with Babel/Babylon, and it’s happening again. Don’t let the memes, mockery and trivia mislead your conscience, you must be prepared to know what to do.
After the Third World War, the New Temple Will Be Rebuilt for Satan, not Yahusha
The New World Order, headed from Israel will require superstate territories that carve up the great regions of the earth, the EU is one aspect of these super-territories that prospectively will enable a one world government to be amply sustained. The upcoming EU referendum in the UK will be rigged, there are Rothschild insiders crawling throughout the political echelons, and David Cameron current British PM, is without a doubt doing what he’s told at a proverbial gunpoint.
The most influential figure by far in the current British government is Peter Mandelson (Zionist) who continues to amass more titles and powers from the beleaguered Prime Minister David Cameron. Mandelson is an insider operative for the Rothschilds and has frequently accepted hospitality from his close friend and associate, Nathaniel Rothschild. A few years ago Mandelson called for the UK to join the (Rothschild) single European currency, something that has yet to happen, but will be forced upon the UK in 2020 when adoption of the Euro becomes compulsory for all member states, this will further centralize monetary power under the Globalists’ belts.
Funnily enough, the hapless and hopeless British Prime Minister Gordon Brown did as he was told and appointed Ivan Lewis (Zionist) to be minister of state with responsibility for, wait for it … British policy on the Middle East, including all affairs regarding Israel.
Returning the focus to the Global stage, the big goal is to fulfill the vision of a Satanic New World Order, but this is a vision that can only happen if massive population reduction occurs (easier to control, microchip and maim fewer people), the Globalists have been secretly using silent, soft-kill tactics to whittle and dumb-down the global population through water fluoridation, dodgy vaccines, hiking up the cancer rates massively, perpetual war (and death), keeping Africa a starving third world continent, damaging radiation from cell phone triangulation. They have also widely advocated birth control, promoting homosexuality and feminism which has gone a long way in reducing the natal rate of the West. These however, are only palliative measures – keeping the population controlled until the initial New World Order mainframe falls into place, then the collapse and mass-death can occur – after all this, the New World Order will be accepted by the masses as their saviour.
I predict one of the following will occur to reduce world population and instate the New World Order, it is no coincidence major bankers, CEOs and politicians etcetera are buying up refuge vaults tucked away in isolated, mountainous regions.
Here is the NWO Agenda as of 1969:
1. Girls would be discouraged from playing with dolls so they wouldn’t think about babies. They would be encouraged to get out on the soccer field instead. Feminism also pushed onto women to belittle men and destroy sacred masculine role, and sacred feminine role for that matter.
2. Guns would be eliminated almost entirely and the few that were allowed to have them for hunting would have to check them out from officials. Guns are in the hands of controlled criminals, a few subordinate individuals and of course, the tyrannical government. There will be no effective means of ousting a corrupt government or initiating a mass-movement.
One ulterior motive of government orchestrated terror attacks is to take away the guns and put them in the hands of the Globalists, this shifts the dependency to the state in the case of a terrorist attack, it also wipes clean any rebellion urges that might surge due to a lack of effective tools to fuel a people run revolution.
3. They already could cure over 98% of all cancers – they had the cures at the Rockefeller Institute. But they would not be released because there were too many people in the world and they had to die of something.
4. Homosexuality will be encouraged – anything goes. – reduces population and confuses sexuality – also very unholy, the Bible does not order us to hate homosexuals, just to not be homosexual ourselves, nevertheless mass-encouraging homosexuality is not good news.
5. Families will diminish in importance. People would be encouraged to live alone.
6. Euthanasia will be encouraged – they will use “the demise pill” to kill themselves.
7. Births will be strictly controlled and you could not simply have children because you wanted them.
8. “Stupid” people would not eat correctly and exercise so they would die much earlier and that’s what they wanted.
9. Private doctors will be eliminated – doctors make too much money.
10. They will make health care so expensive that you must have insurance or be financially destroyed. Limiting access to affordable medical care will make eliminating elderly easier. They would stop hospitals from giving any charity care.
11. New difficult to treat and diagnose diseases will come about as a means of population control.
12. Running shoes and sports equipment will be made glamorous to make the “smart” people get into exercise.
13. Romantic music will not be put out anymore. All the old music will be brought back on certain “oldies” radio stations and the young people will have their own radio stations. Old movies will be put again for the old people.
15. Entire meals will be made and put in grocery stores. Convenience foods will be made unhealthy. They want people that were too lazy to fix their own meals or exercise to die early.
16. They would make puberty come on earlier.
17. Inducing heart attacks as a means of assassination.
18. They will blend all religions but Christianity had to go especially! Once the Roman Catholic is brought down then the rest will go next. Then they will create a new religion – The New Age Satanic Religion that champions man as the deity, and science as the only truth.
19. They will change the Bible over time to become nothing like it once was – churches would help them! This will confuse people and push them away from Abrahamic religion and into their new religion.
20. The education system will be restructured as a tool of indoctrination. Kids will spend more time in school but won’t learn anything. Kids will have to specialize early on in their education and changing their plans will be very difficult.
21. ID will be required for all travel. They will implant IDs inside the skin so that nobody could say they lost their IDs – the mark of the beast? Perhaps in one regard this is.
22. They will control who has access to information. Some books will just disappear or be changed. They will even have thieves steal certain books from the library.
24. Food will be strictly controlled and people would be not allowed to grow their own. They only would give you enough food to give you what you needed but hoarding food or growing food would be criminal activities. They didn’t want anybody to be able to support those outside their system.
25. Travel will be first made cheaper to encourage people to spread out their families but then made very expensive so few people could afford it. The phony Federal Reserve System and its fiat currency makes all of this possible.
26. Crime will be increased as a way to control society into a perpetual state of fear.
28. America would lose her manufacturing base. Other countries would be making the products America are making now, overseas cheap labour is a huge facet of this initiative. This is being reversed in modern times with the mass importation of cheap labour migrants to push down the standards to become equivalent to the third world.
29. Sports would be used as a tool for social change – Soccer was being encouraged since it was a global game. They wanted to do away with anything like football and baseball that were created in the United States. National pride of any type would be discouraged.
31. All television sets would have secret cameras that would watch everybody in the room [just like in George Orwell’s novel, 1984]. This is currently happening to some extent with ‘Smart’ TVs being sold very cheaply to infiltrate the privacy of households.
32. They would implant IDs in everybody. – Not yet occurred, but there are multiple outlets reporting the possibility of this in the near future.
33. They would control what was in our food. Currently happening with Monsanto, Pesticides and GMOs, there are numerous bills initiated to prevent labeling to alert people this is happening.
34. They already controlled the weather. They would stop rain in certain areas to bring them under their control. They would make rain during harvest to make it harder to get the food from the fields. HAARP and the chemtrails theory are bringing this into the modern time as a distinct reality.
35. There were always two reasons for all their actions. The public reason they give everybody, and the REAL reason. Definitely observable in so many things, from 9/11 and nearly all majorly publicized terrorist attacks (all have ulterior motives) to nearly all largely distributed news stories.
36. People don’t ask the right questions – they are too trusting. – Certainly occurring in modern times with the mass dissemination of government figures as friendly, all-smiles men of the people, the liberal atmosphere of just accepting everything has also brought about an unhealthy acceptance of NWO Marxist government.
39. Home ownership will be a thing of the past. Housing markets are being flooded with migrants as competition for properties skyrockets pushing down wages and forcing people to rent.
40. The new system would be either be brought by peaceful means if possible or by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war. People would give up their national sovereignty to keep the peace.- Yet to happen, but very plausible it will.
41. If too many people resisted their plans, there might be a need to use one, two or more nuclear weapons to show that “we mean business”. A false-flag ‘terrorist’ group is likely to take the blame for this, will push a perpetual state of fear mongering, and force people to cling to the government as a solution – the ‘Hegelian Dialectic’ at play.
42. War was justified as a way to control the population. They were happy that World Wars had killed millions so they couldn’t keep having babies. But now with nuclear weapons they would not allow wars to be fought with nuclear weapons on a wide scale.
43. Americans have had it too good, so nuclear terrorism might need to be used in order to implement the New World Order system.
44. Inflation is a tool of control. Money would be turned into credit. Cash would be done away with. People would carry money only for small items such as chewing gun. All else is done electronically. They would ultimately have a single bank system but might appear as several banks. – Happening as cashless initiatives are being pushed everywhere, Rothschild bank occupies nearly every country in the world.
45. All purchases would be tracked. If you bought too much of an item or a particular item, an official would be alerted to investigate. The ability to save would be curtailed so they would not be able to accumulate wealth. Wealth in the hands of the people is not good for those in charge.
46. If you saved too much, your pay would be cut in the future so you could not accumulate any wealth. – Orchestrated financial collapses also help to enforce the reduction of a populations wealth-power influence.
47. Credit would be encouraged so people would get in debt and get in trouble so authorities could come down hard on them.
48. Eventually there would only be one credit card and then after that there would be a skin implant located in your right hand or your forehead. He was told to not worry about what the Bible said about this because this was just the logical place for the implant.
49. Implants would also be used for surveillance. Every citizen could be identified by their own signal through tooth fillings etc.
50. You’ll be watching television and somebody will be watching you at a central station. The TV could be off and still monitor you. They could tell what you are watching and how you are reacting to what you are watching. The signals for monitoring you will go down the cable for your Cable TV and telephone wires.
51. Audio monitors would also be used in other rooms. Any wires that come into the home will be used to monitor you such as telephone wires.
52. There would be service trucks everywhere putting in the monitoring equipment.
53. People that already owned houses would be allowed to keep them but young people would never be able to afford a home. Cost of homes would not come down even with all the empty houses. They would control the price of homes to turn more and more people into renters.
54. People would be assigned where they would live and they would assign non family members to live with you. That’s why the census asks how many bedrooms you have in the home.
55. When the new system comes out, they would be required to sign allegiance to it. There would be no room for people that would not sign their allegiance to the new system. They would be secretly taken to special places where they would not live very long. People will just disappear so they couldn’t be martyrs.
56. The new system will come in over a weekend in the winter. They would announce the new system was in place on a Monday. Everybody will have less leisure time after the new system was brought in so they couldn’t figure out what was going on. The more people work, the less they research.
A financial collapse blamed on Russia/China rendering millions without food, prompting WW3 & massive death tolls.
Russia/China will be framed for a false flag nuclear attack, prompting WW3 to destroy both of them.
Honeybees worldwide are currently rapidly dying out, this will trigger a hunger epidemic – mass death will ensue – WW3 over resources?
Engineered disease will kill billions, a cure/vaccine will be suppressed, WW3 in instability?
However, Russia and China are rapidly breaking away from this New World Order vision, Vladimir Putin of Russia has already pushed for a Ruble-Yuan economic deal that excludes the US dollar and ensures the petrodollars’ control is maimed significantly, and also sees the East unify as a counterweight to the NWO Zionists, Mr. Putin advocates nationality, faith, he discourages homosexuality, has banned harmful GMO food, has made significant steps in defeating the US government run ISIS, has planted troops in the Levant to defend his ally Syria, has counter-attacked the US proxy operations in Ukraine where an active CIA effort is underway to weaken the Russian buffer states (to secede into the EU), and has endorsed the US political outsider, Donald Trump who opposes the NWO, and has expressed a desire to talk to Russia and co-operate – establishment candidate, Hillary Clinton on the other hand wants to demonize Russia, and continue the US perpetual war agenda – and start WW3.
Because of this, the NWO believe that WW3 must occur in order to achieve their goals of world domination, Putin and all his allies, including superpower China, must be erased to do that. That’s a scary prospect indeed.
Russia is our last vestige of hope, if Putin’s co-operative efforts with China do not succeed, WW3 will be initiated, and the New World Order will come to fruition. It’s actually prophesied in the Bible for the outbreak of a great battle to occur near the Euphrates river in the middle east including 200 million men, so we know something is coming.
It’s time to end the New World Order’s enslavement plan, it’s time to definitively end the biggest financial pyramid and ponzi scheme this world have ever known, and embrace Yahuah through Yahusha the true Messiah, and the holy word of the Torah and the Bible. I implore you to do this.
This twisted order is completely run by the global elite, the corrupted Western banksters syndicate and their completely rigged international stock markets.
It is time to end all current corrupted and inadequate institutions: the Senate, Congress, the entire Federal Reserve banking system (As Kennedy tried, and failed to do in 1963 prior to his assassination) and its many fiat money printing schemes, the Bilderbergers, the committee of 300, Yale’s Skulls and Bones, The military arm of the Jesuits, The European black nobility and all other self serving nobilities around the world, all Public and non public institutions of the world that do not care for the well being of the people. Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, HSBC,
The Vatican banking system, just to name a few, among many, many other slave systems that currently enslaves humanity, the corrupt judicial system, the corrupt police system, NSA, Northcom, NORAD, CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, Mossad, Al-qaeda, Halliburton and all the many other terrorist, military paramilitary organizations and the many other secret domestic foreign societies and institutions used to enslave humanity through the abuse of power, consolidation of wealth, social stratification, technological paralysis and labor abuse.
The recent June 12th Orlando nightclub shooting that claimed the lives of 50 (including the gunman) and non-fatally injured 53 others, has gripped the worldwide media and thrown the spotlight yet again on the 2nd amendment and gun control laws – but interestingly enough, not on the growing fomentation of radical Islam in the West.
Obama has wrongly cited the shooting as the biggest massacre on US soil ever, soliciting the tragic events’ emotional traction by politicizing the issue to further his agenda of centralizing 2nd amendment dismantlement. However, Obama has actively disregarded the background of the shooter, who was aligned with ISIS and radical Islam, and had been on the FBI watch list prior to the shooting, yet still dubiously gained access to his firearms through a security job with security firm G4S.
Gun control is a non-issue, it cannot be enforced as much as drug control cannot be enforced; which explains the massive failure of the US war on drugs, which only seeks to place the financial profits from illegal substances under the CIA’s belts to serve their twisted masters. The same applies to guns, banning them puts guns in the hands of the controllers.
Check out the crashed CIA drug plane, which contained 4 tonnes of cocaine that was being unaccountably transported somewhere. Seems like a subversive governmental control over the financial powerhouse of the illegal drug trade to me.
Then you must try to explain what did they do with all the prosperous Heroin Fields in Afghanistan during the statist Bush administration which saw Afghanistan suffer a US invasion.
Afghan Opium fields, accounting for the largest single source of Opium in the world, worth $4 billion per year.
While Obama has politicized the Orlando event without media scrutiny, Donald Trump has used the event to emphasize the issues with radical Islam, and the dire need for heightened background checks on newcomers with substantial criticism from the MSM (Mainstream Media) for ‘exploiting’ the event for his political agenda.
Reporter Paul Joseph Watson observes the lack of emphasis on the radical Islamic, homophobic ideological motive behind the shooting as opposed to the overwhelming blame on the inanimate object that is a gun.
Many more would have died were it not for firearm intervention, as the nightclub was a vulnerable ‘soft spot’ that prohibited the carrying of firearms, the notion that a reduction in firearms availability will solve mass shootings or mass murder is inane, and ignores underground black-market access to firearms, and relies on a liberal perspective that somehow expects a suicidal murderer to care about getting a license or to bother jumping through the hoops of driveling regulations.
Just look what happened in gun-free Paris, look what happened with Anders Breivik who shot dead 69 participants of a Workers’ Youth League (AUF) summer camp on the Norwegian island of Utøya where firearms are not legal for self-defense purposes.
Can we concede that the backwards outlooks & ideologies of the morally and mentally challenged are to blame for mass killings, and not the tools? – tools which are impossible to absolutely restrict, and in attempting to doing so backfires on those who need those tools to level the playing-field in a circumstance where self-defense with firearms is absolutely necessary – unilateral firearms attacks make it extremely difficult to apprehend a perpetrator as they have the advantage of sheer range.
Then there is the coincidence of Obama’s presidency suffering the majority of US mass shootings, could that be to do with the US, CIA established & funded terrorist group ISIS gaining momentum, and the continued intensity of the invasion of the middle-east which inevitably foments drastic Islamic extremism, and a growing hatred of the West?
The Mind Control Thesis
The idea that this shooting is a false flag is not too unfathomable, if the CIA are grooming and inciting acts of Islamic extremism with 9/11, it can also be done here.
Mind control programs might sound crazy, but they are very real and are not to be underestimated, and can easily be applied to the incursion of terrorist attacks by victims of mind control techniques.
Project MKUltra, sometimes referred to as the CIA’s mind control program—was the code name given to an illegal program of experiments on human subjects, designed and undertaken by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
MKUltra used numerous methodologies to manipulate people’s mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially LSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis,[9]sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, as well as various forms of torture.
(MKULTRA was) successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or super spies programmed to carry out sexual favors, assassination, and other terrorist acts.
These top secret programs were successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or super spies programmed to carry out sexual favors, assassination, and other terrorist acts without any conscious knowledge of what they were doing.
If that was not damning enough a case for an orchestrated, false flag terrorist act in Orlando, then the mind control drug, scopolamine, also known as the “Devil’s Breath,” is…
Scopolamine is often referred to as the most dangerous drug in the world. Mainly prevalent in South America, the drug is used to commit the perfect crime — while under the influence of scopolamine, someone could convince you to willingly withdraw and give away your life savings from your bank account, but you would wake up and remember nothing.
After inhaling the “Devil’s Breath,” victims have been known to wake up with no memory of withdrawing their life savings and giving it away.
NASA has mixed scopolamine with dexedrine to form a substance called scop-dex and then administered the drug to trainees during the reduced gravity program. They state that scop-dex drops the motion sickness rate to 15 percent or less.
Of course, since the drug can potentially strip someone of all rational thinking, scopolamine is surrounded by conspiracy theories. It is said to have the abilities of a “truth-serum,” and some stories claim that the drug was used in Nazi Germany as an interrogation tool, according to The Guardian.
The CIA has also been accused of using scopolamine to force the truth out of people, and a theory states that the Batman movie shooter, James Holmes, was set up and drugged with scopolamine in order to brainwash him to commit the mass shooting. Theorists argue that the US government wanted to keep Holmes’ dad from testifying in a high-crime fraud case, and they point out all the strange things about Holmes that just don’t seem to add up.
The same could apply with Manteen’s mobile admittance of being affiliated with ISIS prior to carrying out the mass shooting in Orlando on June 12th, overriding his fathers’ genuine surprise with the act, and disabling any possible court case.
CIA/FBI Ties of Orlando Shooter & Father
What really serves to cement the idea this shooting was yet another false flag, psy-ops orchestration can be branched from the fact the shooter and his father had ties to the CIA/FBI, a big red herring that suggests there may have been a hidden hand involvement here.
Here’s the real reasons to question the true background of the shooter:
The FBI knew about the shooter and investigated him prior to the attack.
The shooter had a connection to a known ISIS recruiter.
The shooter’s father was a former “Afghan presidential candidate” who supported the Taliban.
The FBI’s history in creating terrorism.
So if we know who actually controls ISIS (US-CIA) we can pin this shooting as yet another orchestrated event.
WHO CONTROLS ISIS?
This immensely important question must be asked: If ISIS is responsible for the attacks, who controls ISIS? For many, claims that the attacker belongs to ISIS is a deal breaker. For these individuals, ISIS is a shadowy terrorist organization that supports itself and has created a caliphate in eastern Syria and western Iraq that can scarcely be defeated (except when the Russians bomb it). However, the facts do not support such a shallow understanding of the ISIS terrorist organization. ISIS was entirely created, funded and directed by the United States, Britain, France and other NATO countries. Its actions have been coordinated by the Anglo-American Intelligence apparatus for geopolitical purposes all across the world both at home and abroad. For this reason, the declaration that ISIS committed a terrorist attack in Paris is by no means a get-out-of-jail-free card for the Western Intelligence apparatus. Instead, it is the trademark of their handiwork. Please see these articles for more information on the nature of ISIS: here, here, here and here.
Not a One Man Act
The above video suggests that according to one eyewitness someone was holding the nightclubs’ doors closed preventing the safe passage of members of the public away from the shooter.
“there was a guy there that was trying to […] hold the door closed so that we couldn’t exit,”
Another person claimed that…
“I’m pretty sure it was more than one person, you know, like I said, I heard two guns going at the same time.” The eyewitness said that the event lasted “like eight minutes.”
The witness said that he could smell the gun smoke in the air and that the attackers were “working together.”
“It was not one shot at a time,” but rather from a machine gun,” another witness said, who eventually made it out of the club into the “alleyway.”
This contradicts the official story which claims that the lone gunman used a SIG Sauer MCX semi-automatic rifle and a Glock 17semi-automatic pistol only, these are not automatic weapons, this implies there may have been more than one gunman involved, perhaps several CIA, or paid operatives getting the kills and the heavily drugged ‘perpetrator’ ready to be killed as a scapegoat?
Raw footage from the scene also reveals that officers may have been engaging an additional perpetrator outside of the nightclub, backing up other reports.
Authorities and even the President of the United States, Barack Obama, are currently downplaying the fact that there is a definite radicalized Islamic ideological connection to the attack and again, are covering up the fact that multiple suspects are likely still on the loose, or that these suspects were government paid operatives.
What I propose to do today, is to look at what Russia is really doing in response to the growing threat from the West. But first, I have to set the context or, more accurately, re-set the context in which Russia is operating. Let’s begin by looking at the AngloZionist policies towards Russia.
The West’s actions:
First on this list is, obviously, the conquest by NATO of all of Eastern Europe. I speak of conquest because that is exactly what it is, but a conquest achieved according to the rules of 21st century warfare which I define as “80% informational, 15% economic and 5% military”. Yes, I know, the good folks of Eastern Europe were just dreaming of being subjugated by the US/NATO/EU/etc – but so what? Anyone who has read Sun Tzu will immediately recognize that this deep desire to be ‘incorporated’ into the AngloZionist “Borg” is nothing else but the result of a crushed self-identity, a deep-seated inferiority complex and, thus, a surrender which did not even have to be induced by military means. At the end of the day, it makes no difference what the locals thought they were achieving – they are now subjects of the Empire and their countries more or less irrelevant colonies in the fringe of the AngloZionist Empire. As always, the local comprador elite is now bubbling with pride at being, or so they think, accepted as equals by their new masters (think Poroshenko, Tusk or Grybauskaite) which gives them the courage to bark at Moscow from behind the NATO fence. Good for them.
Second is the now total colonization of Western Europe into the Empire. While NATO moved to the East, the US also took much deeper control of Western Europe which is now administered for the Empire by what the former Mayor of London once called the “great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jellies” – faceless bureaucrats à la François Hollande or Angela Merkel.
Third, the Empire has given its total support to semi-demonic creatures ranging from al-Khattab to Nadezhda Savchenko. The West’s policy is crystal clear and simple to the extreme: if it is anti-Russian we back it. This policy is best exemplified with a Putin and Russia demonization campaign which is, in my opinion, far worse and much more hysterical than anything during the Cold War.
Fourth, the West has made a number of highly disturbing military moves including the deployment of the first elements of an anti-missile system in Eastern Europe, the dispatching of various forms of rapid reaction forces, the deployment of a few armored units, etc. NATO now has forward deployed command posts which can be used to support the engagement of a rapid reaction force.
What does all this add up to?
Right now, nothing much, really. Yes, the NATO move right up to the Russian borders is highly provocative, but primarily in political terms. In purely military terms, not only is this a very bad idea (see cliché #6 here), but the size of the actual forces deployed is, in reality, tiny: the ABM system currently deployed can, at best, hope to intercept a few missiles (10-20 depending on your assumptions) as for the conventional forces they are of the battalion size (more or less 600 soldiers plus support). So right now there is categorically no real military threat to Russia.
So why are the Russians so clearly upset?
Because the current US/NATO moves might well be just the first steps of a much larger effort which, given enough time, might begin presenting a very real danger for Russia.
Furthermore, the kind of rhetoric coming out of the West now is not only militaristic and russophobic, it is often outright messianic. The last time around the West had a flare up of its 1000 year old chronic “messianic syndrome” condition Russia lost 20 (to 30) million people. So the Russians can be forgiven if they are paying a great deal of attention to what the AngloZionist propaganda actually says about them.
The Russians are most dismayed at the re-colonization of western Europe. Long gone are the days when people like Charles de Gaulle, Helmut Schmidt or François Mitterrand, were in charge of Europe’s future. For all their very real faults, these men were at least real patriots and not just US colonial administrators. The ‘loss’ of Western Europe is far more concerning for the Russians than the fact that ex-Soviet colonies in Eastern Europe are now under US colonial administration. Why?
Look at this from the Russian point of view.
The Russians all see that the US power is on the decline and that the dollar will, sooner or later, gradually or suddenly, lose its role as the main reserve and exchange currency on the planet (this process has already begun). Simply put – unless the US finds a way to dramatically change the current international dynamic the AngloZionist Empire will collapse. The Russians believe that what the Americans are doing is, at best, to use tensions with Russia to revive a dormant Cold War v2 and, at worst, to actually start a real shooting war in Europe.
So a declining Empire with a vital need for a major crisis, a spineless Western Europe unable to stand up for its own interest, a subservient Eastern Europe just begging to turn into a massive battlefield between East and West, and a messianic, rabidly russophobic rhetoric as the background for an increase in military deployments on the Russian border. Is anybody really surprised that the Russians are taking all this very, very serious even if right now the military threat is basically non-existent?
The Russian reaction
So let us now examine the Russian reaction to Empire’s stance.
First, the Russians want to make darn sure that the Americans do not give in into the illusion that a full-scale war in Europe would be like WWII which saw the US homeland only suffer a few, tiny, almost symbolic, attacks by the enemy. Since a full scale war in Europe would threaten the very existence of the Russian state and nation, the Russians are now taking measures to make darn sure that, should that happen, the US would pay an immense price for such an attack.
Second, the Russians are now evidently assuming that a conventional threat from the West might materialize in the foreseeable future. They are therefore taking the measures needed to counter that conventional threat.
Third, since the USA appears to be dead set into deploying an anti-ballistic missile system not only in Europe, but also in the Far East, the Russians are taking the measures to both defeat and bypass this system.
The Russian effort is a vast and a complex one, and it covers almost every aspect of Russian force planing, but there are four examples which, I think, best illustrate the Russian determination not to allow a 22 June 1941 to happen again:
The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army (in progress)
The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system (done)
The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM (in progress)
The deployment of the Status-6 strategic torpedo (in progress)
The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army
It is hard to believe, but the fact is that between 1991 and 2016 Russia did not have a single large formation (division size and bigger) in its Western Military District. A few brigades, regiments and battalions which nominally were called an “Army”. To put it simply – Russia clearly did not believe that there was a conventional military threat from the West and therefore she did not even bother deploying any kind of meaningful military force to defend from such a non-existing threat. By the way, that fact should also tell you everything you need to know about Russian plans to invade the Ukraine, Poland or the Baltics: this is utter nonsense. This has now dramatically changed.
Russia has officially announced that the First Guards Tank Army (a formation with a prestigious and very symbolic history). This Guards Tank Army will now include the 4th “Kantemirov” Guards Tank Division, the 2nd “Taman” Guards Motorized Rifle Division, the 6th Tank Brigade, the 27th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade Sevastopol and many support units. This Army’s HQ will be located in the Odinstovo suburb of Moscow. Currently the Army is equipped with T-72B3 and T-80 main battle tanks, but they will be replaced by the brand new and revolutionary T-14 Armata tank while the current infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers will be replaced by the new APC and IFV. In the air, these armored units will be protected and supported by Mi-28 and Ka-52 attack helicopters. Make no mistake, this will be a very large force, exactly the kind of force needed so smash through an attacking enemy forces (by the way, the 1TGA was present at the Kursk battle). I am pretty sure that by the time the 1TGA is fully organized it will become the most powerful armored formation anywhere between the Atlantic and the Urals (especially in qualitative terms). If the current tensions continue or even worsen, the Russians could even augment the 1TGA to a type of 21st century “Shock Army” with increased mobility and specializing in breaking deep into the enemy’s defenses.
The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system
The new Iskander-M operational tactical missile system is a formidable weapon by any standard. While technically it is a short-range tactical missile (under 1000km range, the Iskander-M has an official range of 500km), it can also fire the R-500 missile has the capability of striking at an intermediate/operational range (over 1000km, the R-500 has a range of 2000km). It is extremely accurate, it has advanced anti-ABM capabilities, it flies at hypersonic speeds and is practically undetectable on the ground (see here for more details). This will be the missile tasked with destroying all the units and equipment the US and NATO have forward-deployed in Eastern Europe and, if needed, clear the way for the 1TGA.
The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM
Neither the 1TGA nor the Iskander-M missile will threaten the US homeland in any way. Russia thus needed some kind of weapon which would truly strike fear into the Pentagon and White House in the way the famous RS-36 Voevoda (aka SS-18 “Satan” in US classification) did during the Cold War. The SS-18, the most powerful ICBM ever developed, was scary enough. The RS-28 “Sarmat” (SS-X-30 by NATO classification) brings the terror to a totally new level.
The Sarmat is nothing short of amazing. It will be capable of carrying 10-15 MIRVed warheads which will be delivered in a so-called “depressed” (suborbital) trajectory and which will remain maneuverable at hypersonic speeds. The missile will not have to use the typical trajectory over the North Pole but will be capable of reaching any target anywhere on the planet from any trajectory. All these elements combined will make the Sarmat itself and its warheads completely impossible to intercept.
The Sarmat will also be capable of delivering conventional Iu-71 hypersonic warheads capable of a “kinetic strike” which could be used to strike a fortified enemy target in a non-nuclear conflict. This will be made possible by the amazing accuracy of the Sarmat’s warheads which, courtesy of a recent Russian leak, we now know have a CEP of 10 meters (see screen capture)
The Sarmat’s silos will be protected by a unique “active protection measures” which will include 100 guns capable of firing a “metallic cloud” of forty thousand 30mm “bullets” to an altitude of up to 6km. The Russians are also planning to protect the Sarmat with their new S-500 air defense systems. Finally, the Sarmat’s preparation to start time will be under 60 seconds thanks a a highly automated launch system. What this all means is that the Sarmat missile will be invulnerable in its silo, during it’s flight and on re-entry in the lower parts of the atmosphere.
It is interesting to note that while the USA has made a great deal of noise around its planned Prompt Global Strikesystem, the Russians have already begun deploying their own version of this concept.
What is shown here is an “autonomous underwater vehicle” which has advanced navigational capabilities but which can also be remote controlled and steered from a specialized command module. This vehicle can dive as deep as 1000m, at a speed up to 185km/h and it has a range of up to 10’000km. It is delivered by specially configured submarines.
The Status-6 system can be used to target aircraft carrier battle groups, US navy bases (especially SSBN bases) and, in its most frighting configuration, it can be used to deliver high-radioactivity cobalt bombscapable of laying waste to huge expanses of land. The Status-6 delivery system would be a new version of the T-15 torpedo which would be 24m long, 1,5m wide weigh 40 tons and capable of delivering a 100 megaton warhead which would make it twice as powerful as the most powerful nuclear device ever detonated, the Soviet Czar-bomb (57 megatons). Hiroshima was only 15 kilotons.
Keep in mind that most of the USA’s cities and industrial centers are all along the coastline which makes them extremely vulnerable to torpedo based attacks (be it Sakharov’s proposed “Tsunami bomb” or the Status-6 system). And, just as in the case of the Iskander-M or the Sarmat ICBM, the depth and speed of the Status-6 torpedo would make it basically invulnerable to incerception.
Evaluation:
There is really nothing new in all of the above, and US military commanders have always known that. All the US anti-ballistic missile systems have always been primarily a financial scam, from Reagan’s “Star Wars” to Obama’s “anti-Iranian ABM”. For one thing, any ABM system is susceptible to ‘local saturation’: if you have X number ABM missile protecting a Y long space against an X number of missiles, all that you need to do is to saturate only one sector of the Y space with *a lot* of real and fake missiles by firing them all together through one small sector of the Y space the ABM missile system is protecting. And there are plenty of other measures the Russians could take. They could put just one single SLBM capable submarine in Lake Baikal making it basically invulnerable. There is already some discussion of that idea in Russia. Another very good option would be to re-activate the Soviet BzhRK rail-mobile ICBM. Good luck finding them in the immense Russian train network. In fact, the Russians have plenty of cheap and effective measure. Want me to list one more?
Sure!
Take the Kalibr cruise-missile recently seen in the war in Syria. Did you know that it can be shot from a typical commerical container, like the ones you will find on trucks, trains or ships? Check out this excellent video which explains this:
Just remember that the Kalibr has a range of anywhere between 50km to 4000km and that it can carry a nuclear warhead. How hard would it be for Russia to deploy these cruise missiles right off the US coast in regular container ships? Or just keep a few containers in Cuba or Venezuela? This is a system which is so undetectable that the Russians could deploy it off the coast of Australia to hit the NSA station in Alice Springs if they wanted, an nobody would even see it coming.
The reality is that the notion that the US could trigger a war against Russia (or China for that matter) and not suffer the consequences on the US mainland is absolutely ridiculous. And yet, when I hear all the crazy talk by western politicians and generals I get the impression that they are forgetting about this undeniable fact. Frankly, even the current threats against Russia have a ‘half-backed’ feel to them: a battalion here, another one there, a few missiles here, a few more there. It is like the rulers of the Empire don’t realize that it is a very, very bad idea to constantly poke a bear when all you are carrying with you is a pocket-knife. Sometimes the reaction of western politicians remind me of the thugs who try to rob a gas station with a plastic or empty gun and who are absolutely stunned with they get gunned down by the owner or the cops. This kind of thuggery is nothing more than a form of “suicide by cop” which never ends well for the one trying to get away with it.
So sometimes things have to be said directly and unambiguously: western politicians better not believe in their own imperial hubris. So far, all their threats have achieved is that the Russians have responded with a many but futile verbal protests and a full-scale program to prepare Russia for WWIII.
As I have written many times, Russians are very afraid of war and they will go out of their way to avoid it. But they are also ready for war. This is a uniquely Russian cultural feature which the West has misread an innumerable number of time over the past 1000 years or so. Over and over again have the Europeans attacked Russia only to find themselves into a fight they would never have imagined, even in their worst nightmares. This is why the Russians like to say that “Russia never starts wars, she only ends them”.
There is a profound cultural chasm between how the West views warfare and how the Russians do. In the West, warfare is, really, “the continuation of politics by other means”. For Russians, it is a ruthless struggle for survival. Just look at generals in the West: they are polished and well mannered managers much more similar to corporate executives than with, say, Mafia bosses. Take a look at Russian generals (for example, watch the Victory Day parade in Moscow). In comparison to their western colleagues they look almost brutish, because first and foremost they are ruthless and calculating killers. I don’t mean that in a negative way – they often are individually very honorable and even kind men, and like every good commander, they care for their men and love their country. But the business they are in in not the continuation of politics by other means, the business they are in is survival. At all cost.
You cannot judge a military or, for that matter, a nation, by how it behaves when it triumphs, when it is on the offensive pursing a defeated enemy. All armies look good when they are winning. You can really judge of the nature of a military, or a nation, at its darkest hour, when things are horrible and the situation worse than catastrophic. That was the case in 1995 when the Eltsin regime ordered a totally unprepared, demoralized, poorly trained, poorly fed, poorly equipped and completely disorganized Russian military (well, a few hastily assembled units) to take Grozny from the Chechens. It was hell on earth. Here is some footage of General Lev Rokhlin in a hastily organized command post in a basement inside Grozy. He is as exhausted, dirty and exposed as any of his soldiers. Just look at his face and look at the faces of the men around him. This is what the Russian army looks like when it is in the depth of hell, betrayed by the traitors sitting in the Kremlin and abandoned by most if the Russian people (who, I am sorry to remind here, mostly were only were dreaming of McDonalds and Michael Jackson in 1995).
Embarrassing leaks have revealed that British Government officials colluded in Brussels to keep contentious issues about plans for making the EU into more of a superstate off the political agenda until after next week’s referendum.
One of the most shocking of these secret proposals involves allowing 1.5 million Turks visa-free access to Britain.
Here, DANIEL HANNAN outlines ten more controversial policies EU leaders are planning — by stealth — if we vote to Remain…
Daniel Hannan (pictured) has outlined ten more controversial policies EU leaders are planning — by stealth — if we vote to Remain
1. Banning hair-dryers
The EU plans to outlaw high-energy dishwashers, hair-dryers and other household appliances. It comes after lobbying by German manufacturers, who see an opportunity to keep competitors out of the market.
Even supporters reluctantly admit its environmental impact would be tiny: these gadgets account for 12 per cent of household energy use, or 1 per cent of our carbon footprint. As so often, something presented as eco-friendly turns out to be about commercial advantage.
The proposal, as Commissioner Jyrki Katainen observes, has been ‘ridiculed in the media’. He means the British media, and he’s right. The Finnish politician’s response? Postpone it until autumn.
2. A bigger budget
A mid-term review of the European Union’s seven-year budget was due at the start of the year. But it’s been postponed till after our referendum. Brussels officials privately admitted they were reluctant to give extra ammunition to British Leave campaigners.
What extra ammunition? By the EU’s own admission, its unpaid bills amount to €24.7 billion (£19.6 billion).
Britain pays 12.5 per cent of the budget, so our share of those bills is an additional £2.4 billion. That’s before the extra money being demanded by MEPs to deal with the migration crisis.
3. Open borders
David Cameron tried and failed to get an agreement that the EU’s free movement rules would not apply to countries that might join the EU in future, such as Albania, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro and Turkey.
David Cameron tried and failed to get an agreement that the EU’s free movement rules would not apply to countries that might join the EU in future, such as Albania, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro and Turkey
‘Turkey joining EU is not going to happen’ says David Cameron, yet Angela Merkel recently proposed that Turkey is to be fast-tracked, it might happen sooner than expected, the key is that it is happening.
If we vote to remain on unchanged terms, we are accepting in perpetuity that there can be no control over migratory flows. Having failed to get a better deal before voting to leave, there is no chance of getting one if we were to stay.
The migration crisis has cruelly exposed the weakness of the EU’s Schengen Agreement (which abolished EU internal borders). When Britain joined, we agreed to open our borders to the EU. The EU has now clearly opened its borders to the world. That was never the deal.
4. More bail-outs
The Prime Minister has said very clearly that Britain is exempt from any further bail-outs. The trouble is, he said it in 2013. In June 2015, when Brussels needed more cash for the third Greek bail-out, the UK was forced to loan it £600 million.
Mr Cameron hadn’t lied. He had, indeed, secured an agreement — a written agreement, drawn up in the clearest possible language — that Britain would not have to prop up a currency it had declined to join. But the moment that agreement became inconvenient, the EU ripped it up; Britain was powerless to stop it.
How long before the euro crisis spreads to Italy and France, making Greece look like a sideshow? Jim Mellon, the investment guru, says: ‘When this happens — and I am guessing that it will within three years — the crisis will be so huge that Germany and Britain (if we are still in) would have to help out.’
Having made a billion pounds out of knowing when to buy and sell, he is urging us to sell EU membership urgently.
In June 2015, when Brussels needed more cash for the third Greek bail-out, the UK was forced to loan it £600 million
5. Deeper integration
The EU is responding to the euro and migration crises in the way it responds to everything: by giving more power to Brussels.
To anyone else, it might seem odd to prescribe more of the medicine that sickened the patient in the first place, but Eurocrats are Eurocrats.
In an official document last summer known as the Five Presidents’ Report (the EU has a lot of presidents), Brussels officials called for the harmonisation of budgets, economic policy and taxation, as well as elements of social security.
Although these things are a response to the euro crisis, most will be brought in as single market measures, because that is the only legal mechanism at the EU’s disposal. They will therefore apply to all 28 member states. Britain, despite staying out of the euro and the border-free zone, will be dragged in.
6. Human rights
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) began life as, in effect, the highest tribunal of a trade bloc. Yet, as the EU extended its powers into new areas, the ECJ is now more like a supreme court.
The greatest extension of its powers has come with the adoption of the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. Suddenly, as well as economic issues, euro-judges settle human rights questions.
For example, in a preliminary decision, they have ruled against the deportation of hate-preacher Abu Hamza’s daughter-in-law after her criminal conviction. She is not a British national, but her son is, and the ECJ holds that her deportation would violate his rights as an EU citizen.
7. Arts import licences
London is the centre of the global trade in fine arts, bringing in billions in revenue. Its competitors are New York, Geneva and Hong Kong.
Britain has already been disadvantaged by the EU’s application of VAT to fine arts sales and, even more, by the preposterous Resale Rights rule, which obliges traders to pay a percentage to the heirs of the original artist each time a work is sold on.
Now, Brussels plans an import licensing regime, which would again subject London to more cost and bureaucracy than overseas rivals.
Anthony Browne, chairman of the British Art Market Federation, says: ‘Our big concern is that an import licence system would impose a new and very damaging burden on the British art market which is heavily dependent on cross-border trading.’
8. Wrecking our ports
The EU wants to oblige every port to have more than one provider for its internal services, such as mooring, dredging and unloading.
The EU wants to oblige every port to have more than one provider for its internal services, such as mooring, dredging and unloading (file picture)
This might make sense for state-owned or state-subsidised mega-ports on the Continent, such as Antwerp, Hamburg and Rotterdam. But it makes no sense for British ports which are private, small, and in competition with each other.
Everyone agrees that the measure will deter investment. Every British port operator and every trade union opposes it.
Every British MEP, from the Greens to Ukip, voted against it. But it went through the European Parliament anyway, only to have the final decision suddenly deferred.
It, too, will come back after the referendum. If we vote to stay in, these new rules will hit some of our most successful ports, including Belfast, Glasgow, Bristol, Liverpool, Cardiff, Harwich and Southampton.
9. Quotas for online TV
The European Commission wants online providers to reserve 20 per cent of their content for European programmes which should, it says, be given ‘good visibility’.
EU rules already oblige terrestrial TV to invest in, and broadcast, a certain amount of European material.
The European Commission doesn’t want online providers to be exempt. So, more Euro-noir, less U.S. drama.
10. A European Army
‘No one is talking about a European Army’, say Remainers. No one, except the people running the EU. The European Commission, in its formal statement, calls a European Army ‘a strategic necessity’.
One by one, the EU has acquired the attributes of statehood: a president and a parliament; a currency and taxes; embassies and a foreign minister; a supreme court and a legal system; a national anthem and a flag. A European Army is the logical next step.
Firstly, for those unaware of the constituting pretenses of the sinister Bilderberg group (est. 1954), it consists of a medley of the key Western elites from across Europe and North America coming together for an annual summit to devise strategies of massive, yet secretive soft-power control methods, geopolitical maneuvers and sociopolitical engineering schemes that pertain to both their dominions of immediate influence i.e. the USA, and the wider scope of the international global stage. Their endgame agenda is to establish a one world government, a one world language, a one world faith (new age satanism). However, the Bilderberg group is but one think tank organisational face to a multifaceted beast that includes a plethora of other operating faculties; i.e. the Council on Foreign Relations, the overarching Society of Jesus (Jesuit Order) with the Vatican State, the Illuminati, the Club of Rome, Skull & Bones and Freemasonry etc. all push Satanic goals and give the false illusion of individual operations and sects; they are heads of the same body.
These Satanic Jesuitscall themselves Jews to undermine the very faiths they intend to eradicate, the Judeo-Christian faiths, anything that is close the true faith which is not an organised religion but a spiritual faith & relationship with Yahuah (YHWH), through the holy scriptures of the Torah, the Bible and the teachings of Messiah Yahusha, the one true Messiah, to secure the covenant with Yahuah (YHWH), the one true God.The official symbol of the Jesuits (Society of Jesus, who is the false Messiah, I will explain). As you can see there is Satanic Sun-God symbolism here, suggesting Jesus is the medium for accessing the false light of Lucifer.
Their overriding executive is not known; some attribute their leadership to Jacob de Rothschild, others the Black Pope of the Jesuits, I believe it is Lucifer himself, behind the smoke and mirrors and revolving doors of the towering pyramid (mountain of man 666) it is not difficult to imagine the ultimate manifestation of Good and Evil is not solely reserved for petty sins, trivialized fantasy media and storybooks, but the greatest dichotomy that many never even realize us right under their noses, and defines their adherence to freeing Light, or to shackling Darkness.
No wonder the NWO objective is to…
Induce an society oriented by ‘banter’ to trivialize and belittle important spiritual truths with jokes.
Its other objectives include the mass promotion of homosexuality, the very practice inverts gender roles and turns people away from God.
The destruction of the family unit which threatens their indoctrination measures, and allows for children to be brought up naturally with mindsets that are not in the Globalists’ best interests.
Faith in Yahuah, or at least something on the right tracks towards Yahuah, is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. To abolish this opiate of the masses is to bring their fulfillment & happiness under the parameters of misguided love, fleshy gratification and the God of the State.
To eliminate this opiate, by eradicating the religions of the world, is to bury the remote possibility of people finding the true faith in Yahuah and then demanding their governments adhere to the perfection of the holy law in unaltered, true non-rabbinic Judaism (that does not observe the false rabbinic works of the Talmud).
What nation is there so great that has laws and perfect rules as this Torah, which I place before you this day? (Deuteronomy 4:8)
Religion is the opiate of the people – Karl Marx
Matthew 4:8-9
Again, the devil took Him to a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory; and he said to Him, “All these things I will give You, if You fall down and worship me.”
Jesus Christ; Hesus Horus Krishna (Pagan) the false light-bringer is the false prophet, Lucifer who proclaims himself God incarnate. The true Messiah is Yahusha the light-bringer who is not of the false trinity and is 100% a man, not a demigod.
The trickle-down system of hierarchy is intertwined with a broad pallet of multifaceted organisational pseudonyms and ranks, all intended to obfuscate and obscure the true puppet master and lead astray those seeking to find the single culprit.
The Globalist Jesuits (Society of Jesus the false lightbringer, satanic sun-worshiper), having infiltrated, subverted and taken over many of the predominant secret & open organisations of faith in the world such as the Freemasons (A pagan occultist faith that denounces the true faith, glorifies satanism), the Roman Catholic Vatican and its subsidiaries (A pagan faith that Jesuit Satanists are actively spreading and disparaging the true faith), Rabbinic Judaism (Shifting true Judaism to the false Zionism and Rabbinic Judaism which is man-oriented) the Jesuit Satanists have occupied Judaism and completely inverted its message, Islam is also a Pagan religion created by them, it came from Catholic priests long after the true faith, Communism is also a face of this order devised to push people away from Yahuah (God) by promoting atheism, Communism also favours big government and mass-enslavement.
The true faith incidentally emerged in the cross roads of all the worlds’ cultures, faiths and creeds – the middle east, with the birth of Yahusha (Not Jesus, which means Hesus Horus Krishna, a medley of pagan deities devised by Babylon-descended Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD) the true Messiah, Yahusha (meaning simply Yahuah is Salvation or Deliverance) is exactly the same as Jesus except Yahusha is not ‘God in the flesh’ (Bible clearly states Yahuah is one). Yahusha (The Messiah) has the correct name (Yahuah is Salvation) as well as some other key differences. The true faith pertains to no title, no organised religion, it holds no hierarchy, no special ‘chosen’ people, and defines ‘Church’ as a gathering of people to practice the faith, not a building. The true faith is about the individual’s spirituality under Yahuah (YHWH), not the groups’ organised religion under the blind doctrines, subjective opinions and paganisms of other men.
The titles of ‘God’ and ‘Lord’ are generic terms. If someone says that they believe in god, that is not telling you whom they serve.
Their god could be Allah or Buddha or Satan.
The Father has given us His personal name, but the enemy has caused us to use trite terms such as “Lord” and “God,” which pagan gods are also called, they lack specificity and fail to uphold the covenanted physical-spiritual parallel that enables us to branch out to Yahuah and fulfill the word.
The Jews developed a superstition that it was too holy to pronounce the name YAHUAH or even lay eyes on it, so they replaced every occurrence of the name YAHUAH (over 8,000 times in scripture) with the title LORD in keeping with their Babylonian captors whose god was also the LORD god Ba’al.
When Yahusha the Messiah returns the Jews will no longer be subjugated nor oppressed by other nations. (In fact, there will be no oppression or subjugation anywhere in the world, by anyone against anyone.) The Jews will be free in the Land of Israel, we are all members of the 12 tribes of Israel scattered across the Earth, we will become one in Yahuah, but Satan intends to make us one under his rule, as shown in Babylon with the Tower of Babel. Satan/Lucifer and his prophets also pronounce him as a deity, as the true lightbringer, but he is a deception, a diametric opposite to Yahusha and Yahuah.
As above, so below. The utter importance of physical-spiritual parallels is essential, what we do here in this life reflects in our spirit, if we commit our spirit to the flesh, then our spirit is bound to our body which is doomed to die, if we do things in the spirit, which is eternal, we will be yoked to and sewn to the spirit, and emancipated and avoid the second (spiritual) death that comes after the physical death.
This comes with the Yahushaic Covenant that we might learn the word, act upon the word and thus be emancipated by it in the perfect image of Yahuah through Yahusha (means Yahuah is Salvation, he is our template) the true messiah.
Many blindly follow ‘Jesus’ without questioning the basis for the name, the lying scribes have altered the Bible, and false editions that don’t include the original language and names have been released under the name of Catholic paganism that champions Jesus as the Messiah, this is the whole basis for the Jesuits – the Society of Jesus, the Sun God – Lucifer.We are the temple of Yahuah, however we are supposed to be one with Yahuah but Sin gives us complacency and the false idea our bodies are our sole definition, thus we are ostracized from Yahuah and until this Sin is overcome, and until we surrender ourselves to Yahuah; the temple will be in the hands of Sin, as shown in the Bible, Babylon famously destroys the Temple (physical-spiritual parallel). Our spirit is on trial.
Galatians 6:7-8 ESV
Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.
The harrowing oath that binds a Jesuit follower to the twisted Agenda propagated by occult satanism, little do they realize that their path is one to ruin. Often substantial monetary incentives, status and other gratifications prompt followers into selling themselves, and taking this oath.
The meaning of the word Bilderberg?
Bilder meaning picture, photograph, image produced by photographic means; drawing, painting; image, figure.
Berg, meaning simply mountain.
I will go as far as to attribute this to the false deity they intend to ultimately impose, Lucifer. The Tower of Babel (mountain of man) was built by unified builders – to build is to generate something in your image.
So Bilderberg literally means to build an “image of a mountain” – a pyramid is equatable to a mountain, and so is the system of aristocratic and occultist hierarchy that they advocate, status is just an image of anthropocentric ego, as much as the mountain that hierarchy is based on, this can be paralleled with the biblical mountain that the Devil uses to give an image (not real) to tempt us with a distorted sense of power and status.
And he led Him (Yahusha, the perfect image of Yahuah) up (The mountain) and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said to Him, “I will give You all this domain and its glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I give it to whomever I wish. “Therefore if You worship before me, it shall all be Yours.”
However, we know that the Bible states clearly this mountain will fall away with all of the things of the world in the end. In other words, sewing your spirit into the things of the tangible flesh will reap only death, as these things will not last. This essential idea is founded in science, all material things are subject to a process called entropy which observes the cumulative waste of all structured things over time.
Their satanic, occultist goals are outlined as follows:
“one international identify (observing) one set of universal values;”
– centralized control of world populations by “mind control;” in other words, controlling world public opinion;
– a New World Order with no middle class, only “rulers and servants (serfs),” and, of course, no democracy, set to be fulfilled with interconnected superstates such as the European Union, the African Union, the Asian Union and the North American Union;
– “a zero-growth society” without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the rulers;
– manufactured crises and perpetual wars fomented by their omnipotent grip on world banking and the printing of fiat, unbacked currency to prompt disruptive shockwaves and pull the strings of the people with the Hegelian Dialectic;
– absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;
– “centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies;” one size fits all globally;
– using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on “world citizens;”
– expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;
– making NATO a world military;
– making a one world religion, the new age Satanic faith (won’t be called that but will praise an image of satan) all other faiths are eradicated, including the Judeo-Yahushaic faith. A so called ‘New Age’ Faith is currently gaining momentum, one of their primary attributes is incidentally their acceptance of man as ‘God’ – that in itself is praising the beast, and a telling foresight into what we can expect in if a World government gets into power under Lucifer.
The brilliant Communist-Jesuit-Globalist leaders knew and perceived that it was Judaism that still infused and permeated a spirituality into those other religions, even though the religion was despised by many of the leaders of the daughter religions.
The heretical Jesuit-Catholics laid plans which they felt could take a century or more for the ultimate destruction of the church; the apostate Jews (disguising themselves as Jews) for the ultimate destruction of the true Jewish religion.
– reducing the world’s population below 1 billion to ensure control is easy
– imposing a universal legal system; and
– a global “welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for extermination.”
From its beginnings, CFR was committed to “a one-world government based on a centralized global financing system….”
The Bilderberg meeting scheduled for 2016 has come and gone in the German city of Dresden. On the current affairs agenda included:
Artificial Intelligence
Cybersecurity
Chemical Weapons Threats
Current Economic Issue
European Strategy, including the Brexit issue.
Globalisation
Greece
Iran
Pro-Migration Policies
Middle East
NATO
Russia
Terrorism
United Kingdom/Brexit
USA
US Elections, the promotion of Hillary Clinton and denunciation of Donald Trump.
The Bilderberger’s intentions are to induce their agendas by means of silent weapons for quiet wars, in other words: underhand geopolitical tricks are being actively used to create an atmosphere where their agenda is pushed, and to generate a situation where the masses will give up their individual rights, liberties and forget the teachings in complete favour of self-preservation.
Later at the 1992 Bilderberg Group meeting, Henry Kissinger said:
“Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.”
The Bolsheviks deposited over 600 million rubles to Schiffs banking firm, Kuhn and Loeb. It was Jacob Schiff and his family who played a prominent role in developing the Reform and Conservative apostate Jewish movements, and who aided them at critical stages of their development in 14 putting into action the demonic master plan to undermine all world religions. Fragmentation, and divide and conquer tactics were the order of the day.
The current migration crisis does many things, but among the largest implications of this orchestrated geopolitical manipulation includes the destabilization of western Europe and the downfall of its fundamental Judeo-Christian values, of which are nearly identically akin to the true faith non-rabbinical Judaism of the original, unaltered scriptures dating back to 2000-3000 BC.
These values uphold progressive rights, liberty, disciplinary behavior, constitutionalism, individualism, democratic rights, anti-materialism, human rights, spirituality according to the Word, and essential civil societal norms. This explains why these globalist Bolsheviks want to overthrow this rigid value system and shift the focus to reliance on the State as opposed to skepticism of the state, and the expectation of the state as the servant of the people.
The crisis also consolidates the EU, the first foothold in gaining world superstates for the endgame establishment of a world government. Socialist, welfare inclined migrants will vote in bigger government, the more that are brought in, the faster this happens.
It is also a huge clash of civilizations, there will be unrest and civil disparity as a lack of cultural integration drives the indigenous and migrant populations into a divide, it is a forced binding of regressive third world laws and values onto the 1st world west. Migrant populations will out-breed the indigenous quickly and the west will be a memory in due time, along with all its standards and religious values.
This makes the atmosphere easy-pickings for introducing socialist policies that further bastardize the middle class worker, drive down wages and put the power evermore into governmental hands.
It also destroys national identity, wipes away patriotism which is essential for a nation state, along with its values and cultural identity – this makes the outsider migrants obedient to those who gave them better living (worse than the western standard of living, but better nonetheless) they will praise the EU & controllers and work everyday to the bidding of their new slave masters.
Here is an excerpt from the index of the scarcely printed book ‘Sir John Glubb – The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival’ detailing the natural rise, apex and decline of Empires throughout recorded History.
Could this sequence be reminiscent of the stage currently present in Western civilization – The Age of Decadence, perhaps?
Where emotion supersedes reason, the men are subservient & fearful towards the women, and undue defensiveness (SJWs and liberals), saturated pessimism (Rise of suicide rates and pessimist subcultures like 4chan), rampant materialism (self explanatory, pop culture and the rise of promiscuity) and excessive frivolity (wayward meme/banter culture & the decline of seriousness) are defining, manifested attributes that crumble a progressive collection of states, or an Empire state.
Roman Empire Comparison to EU/Western States
Allow me to parallel the current situation with the decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, an entity that had enjoyed centuries of unmatched technological, social and economic progression & prosperity, emancipating dark age Europe into civil illumination, and setting the contours of modern day western political systems, as opposed to the backwardness of its predecessor; tribal feudalism.
Take it or leave it, this Bible verse is absolutely right, regardless of your religious orientation, in summarizing the cyclical fate of Empires:
Ecclesiastes 1:9 (NIV)
What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
Upon investigating Rome’s fall, you will find an uncanny similarity between the Roman demise and the present day trajectory in near identical regards…
Invasions by Barbarian tribes, the arrival of the Huns & the migration of the Barbarian tribes
It takes very little insight to pin these pivotal factors in Rome’s downfall to the current mass-migration that is completely altering western ways to what is absolutely a barbarian ideology; Shariah Law and other doctrines and trappings of the sociopolitically challenged Qu’ran. While it was Christianity that overthrew the presiding faith in the Roman Empire, we can easily parallel modern day circumstance with Islam eroding the predominant Christian faith. Here’s why Shariah is the culprit.
It may seem inflammatory to accuse near-east people of being ‘barbarians’ but the misinterpreted derogatory malice attached to ‘barbarians’ overlooks the words’ intended definition, which observes backwards cultural values. A self-evidently eminent feature of near-east culture.
The contiguous Huns are comparable to ISIS, both driving forces of border denigration & disruption, this vested interest, ever-moving, almost nomadic sect that holds little to no statutory recognition is forcibly pushing migrants up to the proverbial glass pane of Europe and the West’s borders. It is as the Huns conjured with the Barbarian tribes; tribes that unfortunately lacked the sociopolitical advancement & understanding of the Romans, and were reluctantly allowed into Roman lands by necessity, with severe costs. Mass-migration rapidly emerged as a ‘Trojan horse’ of sorts, where irreconcilable differences caused barbarian tribes to rise up against their Roman refuge and seize control.
(When peaceful coexistence broke down) The Romans negotiated a flimsy peace with the barbarians, but the truce unraveled in 410, when the Goth King Alaric moved west and sacked Rome.
The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns’ invasion of Europe in the late fourth century. When these Eurasian warriors rampaged through northern Europe, they drove many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire.
With the Western Empire weakened, Germanic tribes like the Vandals and the Saxons were able to surge across its borders and occupy Britain, Spain and North Africa (comparable to modern day population replacement). The maladjusted rule of these tribes brought about a dark age with consequentially very little advancement at all for Europe, it was only the renaissance that salvaged Europe, reintroducing many Roman & Greek ideas and their rules of law.
The rise of the Eastern Empire
The Eastern Empire (Like the EU) overrode the West (Like modern Western states), providing another divisive factor in assuring the West would fall in the midst of its barbarian (migrant) and Hun (ISIS) occupiers. With Eastern armies (EU threats, soon to be enforced by an EU army) and embargoes (Economic regulations on member states) supplanting the many strengths of the West, it was only a matter of time before a crack became a crevice in the West’s weakening mettle.
I consider the rise of the EU as an imperial force, and comparably about as equal to the Eastern Roman Empire’s targeting of its Western counterpart.
The EU Empire, (or the Eastern Roman Empire by comparison), has also since turned its back on mutuality regarding the political & legislative reigns of authority, and sapped the EU member states of their defense mechanisms against cultural dilution, and the overthrow of its imperative values by means of crippling economic directives and forced migration policies.
Religious Replacement
In no point in history has the replacement of a dominant religion with another not caused civil unrest, it happened with the fall of Rome, and it’s currently happening with the fall of the Western states. If a certain peoples’ underlying values are taken away, they have little to no common basis to align themselves with, it’s a dastardly formula for palpable civil and religious collapse, and widespread conflict.
Overexpansion and military overspending
This is happening across the West, not just in the EU which has given emphasis to the formation of an EU army. The USA’s military budget is remarkably high at around $600 billion.
The prime issue here is that he who glorifies the sword, is doomed to die by the sword in one way or another, by wreaking havoc in the middle east you make enemies: and culture extremism. By overspending on perpetual war you create a bloated, overextended army that is slow and cumbersome, and burdens its owner with an arms budget drain that saps money from other crucial areas of the state unit. This deficit will undoubtedly come around to afflict havoc on the West in the long term, which is seen all over with mass-unemployment, declining industry, and neglected infrastructure, etc.
As more and more funds were funneled into the military upkeep of the empire, technological advancement slowed and Rome’s civil infrastructure fell into disrepair.
The EU is a sprawling, growing beast of massive proportions, that is still acquiring new states today under the guise of it being a ‘mutual acceptance’ with a few bribes here and there to draw-in the catch, once inside – the political climate changes rapidly to favour Brussels.
Bringing in the likes of Turkey, Ukraine and Romania further extends the EU, it’s only a matter of time before one of the states refuses the ball and chain. The UK, for example, has employed a referendum to do exactly this – an early sign of the gluttonous, over-sized EU meeting its fate.
Weakening of the Roman legions/Patriotism
I pin this cause mainly to the decline of patriotism, the legions’ waning loyalty was a consequential effect of a lack of national pride. It can be seen in the EU with the single army being proposed, and the prolific cultural Marxism that enforces the denigration of national identity – no identity, no need to bind yourself to your nation state’s armed forces, you just enroll at the EU instead.
The ranks of the legions eventually swelled with Germanic Goths and other barbarians, so much so that Romans began using the Latin word “barbarus” in place of “soldier.”
This dilution of an army’s national roots removes the physical defense of a nation state, and relegates a state to written acknowledgement, something that can be written away just as easily with a corrupt, underhand EU directive somewhere down the gloomy road of cultural Marxism – where enough migrant foreigners, personally unaffiliated with their new home, are around to vote it in.
Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor
The EU bureaucrats love importing cheap labour, thus pushing down the wages and exploiting the desperation of the third world. The need for labour, in the ever-expanding EU, to face the Russian-Chinese powerhouse; has subsequently pushed the dire need for dirt cheap workers to be imported in mass.
Cheap slave labor in turn resulted in the unemployment of the the people of Rome who became dependent on hand-outs from the state.
This will push down public salary satisfaction and overall contentment, the result is yet more instability.
The empire was rocked by a labor deficit. Rome’s economy depended on slaves to till its fields and work as craftsmen, and its military might had traditionally provided a fresh influx of conquered peoples to put to work.
In the hope of avoiding the taxman, many members of the wealthy classes had even fled to the countryside and set up independent fiefdoms.
Antagonism between the Emperor & Senate
Similar in many ways to the growing differences between the EU courts and the various ministers representing their EU member states.
For example, Viktor Orban of Hungary has been at odds with the imposed migration policies forced onto his country by the EU.
‘To be clear and unequivocal, I can say that Islamisation is constitutionally banned in Hungary’ – Viktor Orban, Prime Minister of Hungary speaking of the culture-shifting effects of mass-migration.
In Switzerland there have been similar sentiments, this time concerning a ‘Marxist Dream’:
A number of European countries are considering introducing a universal basic income (UBI) – known as the “Marxist Dream” – for all citizens, despite the Swiss voting the policy out at a referendum held on June 5.
Besides, as imparted in previous articles, the EU’s balkanizing redistribution of people on a massive scale to usher in what is confessed to be a singular superstate of Europe, not simply a trade bloc to boost our economy; the economic side must also concur with this major centralization ambition as well.
Over the past decade there has been a tenfold increase in the volume of EU law on financial services. More and more activities are coming under the control of majority voting and one of our remaining successful industries is in danger.
The UK has been one of the main member states to endure the brunt of these redistribution endeavors, with flagship car manufacturers such as Peugeot receiving EU bribes to relocate to poorer EU countries in the name of said redistribution. The UK’s fishing industry received a similar fate with copious EU bribes requesting the dismantlement of vessels and resignation of trawlers across the UK, this series of underhand action is without relent.
These events usher the extensive subsidization & dissolution of larger states’ assets, states that are more liable to opting out of the EU with the comforting safeguard they will be self-sustaining. Knock the source of a nations’ goodies in favour of remaining in the EU, and you oust referendum chances going against your big agenda…
Take away a bigger states’ economic supports and they will have nowhere to retreat to when the EU eventually abuses its dominance in the near future. At a point where dependency on Brussels has reached a prime level.
The EU’s severing of economic safeguards and release clauses in order to consolidate itself is to transgress a nations’ sovereignty and surefooted self-assurance, and it’s happening profusely across the board.
But look into almost any of our industries and you will find something, somewhere that has been handicapped or damaged by the European Union.
This crass dismantlement is rather showing of an ever increasingly power-hungry, untamed EU that evidently lacks the ingenuous sensitivity to govern it’s member states at best, but is perhaps hellbent on establishing its dogmatic authority, breaking the backs of dissenters, and mitigating secessionist inklings at worst.
Did the EU deliberately set out to hurt our auction industry? I don’t know. But this was a case where Britain was the most successful country in Europe and rules were made in Brussels by people who, at best, did not care about the damage they would do.
What we do know is that the EU is willing to exact threats on states that sidestep its authority, as seen in recent times with the Swiss referendum on EU migration policies.
Switzerland’s defense minister said it was “unthinkable” that his country’s accords with the European Union would be terminated as result of a referendum to curb immigration, saying threats of retaliation by the bloc were overblown.
It’s unthinkable that the bilaterals will be terminated, whether by Switzerland or by the EU. Both sides benefit from them.
Iceland, Switzerland and Norway all enjoy the perks of the European market without the burden of the EU. So come on out – the water’s lovely.
Britain was once the leading EFTA state. It can be again, provided free-trade is re-established in Europe, and it is about time.
In the UK the bigwig establishment has become noticeably clumped together in their plight to retain the gravy-train EU, described by some as the ‘ruling Elite versus the people’.
exchange with hilarybennmp on ability to nationalise the railways if we stay in interesting. Benn looked uncomfortable #euref
This notion is especially solidified with infamous ‘project fear’ enveloping nearly the entire rhetoric of the ‘Remain’ campaign, and being the driving force for the majority of David Cameron’s speeches, focusing on drawing out speculative negativity as somehow a strong basis for remaining, and ignoring the blatancy of there being positives in dropping out of the failing EU.
It’s a game of stating mights for Remain, without any of the mightiness to back it.
Brexit might undermine security, might kill jobs, might leave Britain utterly isolated on the world stage. It might cause Godzilla to awaken from the depths and reduce London to ashes. It won’t. But it might. – Tim Stanley
The EU is simply, and worryingly, a game of slowly trying to forget the days of particulate statehood and embracing the globalist idea of massive, continental-ruled superstates ruled by an all-powerful headship, one that is largely unaccountable, unelected, and holds far too much sway over the politics of its numerous demesnes, (supposedly sovereign nations, pssh).
It ignores the nuances and intricacies of our individuality, discarding, or at least blunting the importance of cultural, social, religious and political best-interests & identity in a given state, with forced deluges of unchecked migration, and certainly disregards the importance of democratic, constitutional, bottom-up rule originally championed by renaissance Europe.
For me, EU branded Europe is a noticeable step back in time, it is not a bastion of limited government that is accountable for its decision making, but a cohort of bureaucracy driven by unelected career politicians. Neither is it too economically nourishing, as the slowest growing trade bloc in the world sporting economically challenged states; largely a product of the bickering and infighting generated by the EU courts.
But perhaps ultimately, it trashes the distinctions of European identity, a continent of historical richness and libertine progression cast back to the shadows of its past by shoddy migration policies imploring mass immigration, and a basket case free movement area that just worsens it all, giving nowhere near enough opportunity for third world cultural and ideological integration and assimilation, not to mention discriminating against non-EU migrants with a points system.
Ominously reminiscent of Babylon’s ‘Tower of Babel’ built by unified nations & tribes of one tongue and identity to usurp God. A relevant quip and uncomfortably apparent in the EU.
But this is likely the most damning evidence of redistribution, with the UK in the top flight of those who suffer…
The current climate of demographic race mixing is effectively a reversed Holocaust,
Let me explain:
Instead of simply killing off the undesirable populace like Hitler advocated in the 1940s in Nazi ruled Germany and its conquered dominions. The new form of holocaust, or cultural genocide – is to overwhelmingly collide one culturally distinct people with another in the hopes of weakening the presiding cultural dominance of the undesirable populace.
This eliminates the need for conquest to subdue a state to the will of the controlling power and its agenda, instead by sneaking in backdoor soft-methods of diplomacy, the people will unknowingly accept their cultural values, ways and political priorities being gradually overridden by the means of being made a minority in their own country.
The EU is tacitly empowered enough to enact this subterfuge, undemocratically enabling 5 Presidents to call the shots on matters of borders and migrants, and galvanizing enough influence to threaten any state that fails to comply i.e. Hungary, Greece etc.
The EU wants us to remain part of a club that bullies and intimidates its members.
Threatens them with isolation and punishment if they leave
Threatens to bankrupt them if they do not keep to austerity and accept their loans to pay off richer countries Banks.
Gives fiscal favours to their members that support them (France)
Threaten them with Fines if they do not do what they are told (Hungary,Poland and the UK)
Leave some of their weaker members to go to the wall (Greece) whilst protecting the stronger ones (Germany and France).
Preside over huge unemployment in your southern member states.
This migrant abuse is being seen widely under the unilateral (one-sided) EU, a deregulated unit where sovereign nations; with their cultures, values and borders are all being actively denigrated to make way for the mass importation of a preferred group of people that hold values that are vastly different, and preferred by the twisted arbiters of this demographic manipulation; such as state-empowering socialism, support for the consolidation of the EU, and lowering standards of the middle & working class to benefit the rich.
The more socialist inclined migrants you import the more you have a founded base of the population that will vote for your agenda. It’s mob rule in action, an exploitation of the fallacious majority-rule democracy that will ignore civil constitutional, republican values, and furthers the interests of the EU and globalists, who hope to get rid of the sacrosanct, freedom oriented Western ways. Which is not remotely comparable to the regressive Eastern world (where most of the migrants are incidentally being brought in from, most of which are not even refugees).
The deregulated Schengen zone is incentivising migration, making vast swathes cross oceans, it’s definitely not war that is the main cause of this because migrants are coming from many more non war-torn states than are.
Instead of raising the cultural standards of Africa and Mexico, the Bolsheviks are lowering the cultural (and living)
standards in the West to that of the 3rd World.
Patriotism and national self interest is the new racism. Only Global-Socialism need apply.
– Mark Quon
Campaign funded guilt, i.e.’Nazi guilt’ in Germany for example, has whittled down resistance to accepting mass migration; along with the phony ‘white privilege’ arguments, black lives matter (how about all lives matter?), the dead refugee guilt-tripping broadcasts on mainstream media outlets, political correctness including the fear of being called a racist (deters talking about migration), and the pushing of the failed multiculturalism programme, which wrongly suggests that a mixed culture society will be automatically concordant.
Is it all starting to make sense now?
We’ve been made to focus so much on not racially glorifying our own kin, that we have let that take precedence over the protection of our highly successful, constitutional values and culture, something sorely lacking in the medieval third world.
We have been forced to focus so much on not being racist towards migrants that we have utterly forgotten about the sheer cultural differences that are inherent between different groups of people.
We have forgotten, in all our sickeningly, overly-liberal oneness, that the current mass-migration programme is not championing liberal, western values, but instilling regressive eastern values in-mass, and changing the political face of Europe altogether.
We have ignored calls for integration, assuming that this is somehow patronizingly superficial to expect of newcomers to Western countries (backed by the insipid white guilt campaigns), we have pinned our disregard for extreme, socialistic ideologies to instead debating the colour of the skin, how unintegrated diversity is somehow enriching, or whether Islamic migrants get to wear their Hijab/Burqa headdress or not.
Decadence is the natural result of all this, as articulated in the outlawed book ‘Fall of Empires’:
Decadence is marked by:
Defensiveness
Pessimism
Materialism
Frivolity
An influx of foreigners
The Welfare State
A weakening of religion.
The European Union (EU), having come into fruition in the early 70s as a trade bloc/customs union in the face of the ever hulking USSR, has now become evermore redundant in modern times, where openness presently discards insularity and the thaw of the Cold War has given rise to a more amicable, diplomatic global stage (not an era where shut-in trade blocs seemed like the future). The EU is thus, no longer bearing the relevancy as a defensive bulwark of economic fortification that it once was.
Unfortunately, the EU has outgrown its initial purpose of just smoothing trade barriers, it is now attributing unwarranted power to the little known, unelected5 presidents of the EU institutions (that I reckon you cannot name) seated in the Brussels complex, and undemocratically granting these quango figureheads substantially unchallenged political sway over the 28 member states that comprise the union. i.e. holding influential authority over upwards of 50% of UK laws by means of EU regulations.
“Free from EU rules and regulations, Britain could reinvent itself as a Singapore-style supercharged economy.” (Upon Brexit)
So let’s evaluate the pros and cons of remaining or seceding from a Union that has rapidly evolved in recent times without nearly enough audition.
The Pros/Cons of staying in the EU
Pros: Trade and inter-connectivity inside Europe: trade between the member states is admittedly somewhat smoother, the EU delivers in the initial goal of achieving this. The EU is a single market in which no tariffs are imposed on imports and exports between member states. “More than 50 percent of our exports go to EU countries” this is essentially modeled at forgetting individual states, you will see this fluidity becoming so much so that individual states become unrecognizable by approximately 2060, in a Babel-esque move for an absolutist European singularity, distinct cultural ties must be liquidated. To some this is progressive as provides unity in the aftermath of two world wars, however other sources have suggested that it is solely in the interest of certain powers to combat the rise of a Russia-China unification (China is a 800 million hard-working person powerhouse!) by boosting Europe as a Bloc of the front-line against the rising Eastern world, reflected in the exclusion of both Russia and China in EU trade negotiations. To me it seems to be a dichotomy making effort that will only further the rift between the East and the West, and exacerbate the chances of a third world war being initiated.
Cons: Trade and inter-connectivity inside Europe: The EU locks member states into being answerable to the decisions of the presidents of the EU commission at Brussels for the majority of our trade agreements, most of which are heavily regulated and strictly forbid us branching out on our own basis to trade with China, Russia, or India for example (the stat of 50% of exports going to the EU is very variable, for example these exports could go to world markets if we left the EU, or would remain going to Europe, just not under the EU.) The EU solely embraces the concept that will fuse all member states under one unified roof; the need for sovereign parliaments will eventually be wiped away, the EU naturally does not give us free reign over our own trade because honouring individual states is not its ultimate aim or agenda: one massive state ruled by unaccountable, unelected ministers is! Doesn’t seem sensible to me, as most problems of the world have nearly always arisen from big government.
The EU is rather akin to the USSR both in structure and practice, and is poised to soon enough become waywardly socialist by importing socialist leaning people en masse!
By 2020 all EU member states must adopt the Euro;including Great Britain. Forget the rhetoric that suggests we retain the pound.
Further political centralization is expected to be drawn into Brussels once the UK Referendum is over.
Goldman Sachs and big banks love the EU as it gives them extended control over the economies of Europe via the incredibly centralized Brussels, a single market is much easier to dominate and influence. Check Here for more on that.
Kalashnikovs and terrorist armaments, not to mention drugs and contraband are easily getting around Europe with the fallible Schengen area, worsening crime and enabling heightened deployability of terrorist operations akin to the recent Brussels bombings.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, who has come out in favour of Brexit, says we are leaving the “door open” to terrorist attacks by remaining in the EU. “This open border does not allow us to check and control people.”
Pros: Borderless Migration: getting around Europe is made easy, the Schengen area permits free movement of people and their labour, but usually at the cost of depriving weaker countries and reinforcing already economically strong states. The trade-in for this is migrants from within Europe can greatly boost economies and labour-forces, but at the cost of the average wage declining in the host nation. This benefits CEOs mainly, who will inevitably make more money with a more grateful, low-salary workforce. The legislation of the Working Time Directive seems to cover this up, however there is a huge incentive for CEOs to back staying in based on cheaper labour from free movement within the EU that favours low pay workers most (that they want), not the middle-class natives and SME business owners, who are already settled comfortably.
Case Study: Migrant workers are simply leaving a crumbling Spanish economy and coming to the UK, pushing down our wages, increasing job and property contest here, and crippling the Spanish yet further. it is this economic centralization and the favouring of the flagship states in Europe that is doing an injustice to the weaker states in Europe.
Without restrictions on who comes here (The UK), the poorer provider countries lose population and their workers (both skilled and unskilled) people flood into richer countries without much audition. There is no limitation. Yet ironically there is discriminant limitation on those who can come here from outside the EU, it all screams a basket case, single population state that is being slowly implemented.
Case Study: Turkey is set to be fast-tracked to join the EU, using its efforts at siphoning migrant flow through its borders as a reason for its accelerated inclusion. This will be opening the gates to 75 million Turks to have free travel across the board, putting more stress on the UK and other EU flagship states. David Cameron has lied concerning this issue claiming it would take ‘decades’ for the Turks to get in, but that disregards the reality the EU parliament can override legal processes and the general consensus favours Turkey getting in early.
8% of Turks are ISIS sympathizers! That’s roughly around 6000,000 people.
Defence minister Penny Mordaunt said the migrant crisis would hasten talks over Turkey’s EU bid and the UK was powerless to stop it.
Cons: Borderless Migration: We have little control over who comes into the country, because the EU has overextended itself so much, and independent states can no longer act independently with their own borders. Illegal migrants from outside the EU are quite easily physically gaining access by crossing narrow straits and passing into the continent without scrutiny via Schengen, gaining visas with less and less requirements. These migrants often have no interest in benefiting the EU in many cases, flocking to the welfare states such as the UK or Germany for the freebie financial incentives and establishing themselves, utterly unconcerned with meaningfully integrating themselves; giving way to ethnic enclaves and the transformation of the entire political landscape, it is a replacement, not an integration.
The social impacts are severe, Islamic people now form majorities in a few European capitals, and ethnic enclaves are on the rise. This is not about race, because massed, unlimited migration shifts the entire political and social structure of a country to accommodate eastern principles, legal standpoints such as the oppressive Shariah law are now being encouraged and enabled due to the largely Islamic, unintegrated majority populaces voting in leaders that favour Islamic, non-western ideologies over progressive, western ones. It’s a natural consequence of mass-migration, and a lack of successful migrant integration.
The numbers don’t lie on estimated European Union Migration to the UK, but David Cameron has lied concerning Migration and its limitation numerous times, especially regarding his claims to limit migration to the tens of thousands during his term, this has not happened as shown above, EU Freedom of movement in itself actually prohibits it!
Cameron claims in the video below that he’s using standards for the citizenship of migrants to curb overall migration, yet migrant unemployment is at 70% or at least high, with them not being deported despite Cameron claiming that deportation would be imposed on unemployed, welfare sapping migrants. Again, he lies, and he’s very good at lying. Migration is not going to be reduced, do not kid yourself. Cameron wants to appease the voter to get his way now, then just continue this devastating trend unhindered after the referendum.
Support for Socialist parties, and the favouring of big government with these migrants gaining the majority vote perpetuates the issue further. An inside-out transformation of political opinion is occurring, the migrant crisis is effectively a political Trojan Horse for converting public opinion which favours growing the EU further. The longer the EU is intact, the more majoritarian democracy is bent to the unelected EU kingpins by mass importing the opinion they want.
Social Impacts, conversion/replacement of western culture to regressive eastern ways due to sheer lack of integration. ‘White Flight‘, the rise of segregationist groups such as Britain First, and the election of Muslim London Mayor Sadiq Khan prove that there is an unaddressed, growing cultural divergence in the UK.
Welfare, the big incentive for migrants coming in their million hordes.The goal of the EU is to bring about an increasingly socialist climate in its member states, that’s why it is ever increasingly comparable to the Soviet Union and its’ pet states. Migrants, generally poorer, are the only demographic that are going to overwhelmingly accept this vision.
Stress on services and housing from dramatic migration could push the NHS to collapse & go private, and national housing prices to skyrocket considerably, this level of migration is simply unsustainable.
Stress on jobs from migration will drive down our wages, and generate more competition, making the entire climate more difficult for everyone financially, and with their employability – CEOs love the large pool of candidates, but the common people just suffer as a result.
Migrants favour their own gain (welfare state) and do not prioritize liberties and constitutional values nearly as much as the western people do (The EU has no active constitution suppressing authoritarianism or enforcing the democratic rights of the people) largely ignored in mainstream debates about the EU. They (Migrants) are used as voting fodder to bolster socialism, and consolidating larger, more controlling governmental entities (Favours EU). And of course, to ultimately forget the western culture that had originally kindled democracy, liberty, progressive Christian values, and the vital, ever-important constitutional documents such as the Magna Carta that ensure democratic liberties remain intact. The EU is the utter antithesis of this and uses penchant bribes; i.e. cheaper landline costs and cheaper flights to win over less politically knowledgeable people to vote for it!
Pros: Favours Poorer Migrants & Refugees: to them, this is positive as it gives these people from greatly poorer states an opportunity to come and work in 1st world welfare states such as the UK, Sweden and Germany. They get accommodated, they get pension guarantees, they get housing – the EU is grooming them and enticing them, and they do not care about their impact on the natives, the notion of Kafirs (non-believers) is prominent throughout Islamic culture (A predominant faith of migrants), a discriminatory ideology in the Qu’ran that orders Islamic people to disdain all non-believers.
Does this seem conducive to overall successful integration to you? …
The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse.
Here are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.
“Multiculturalism”: It has been argued by many that multiculturalism has ‘enriched’ European cultures; in reality it does not work particularly well and actually causes social divides. It is positive for those of foreign backgrounds as the EU is pushing for prioritizing migrants settlers over natives, introducing quotas providing pole-position for migrants in attaining employment. What it does do is import a more amicable workforce for big companies and bring in people grateful to work for pennies, people who will vote in bigger government, people who will favour the EU.
Cons: Favours Poor Migrants & Refugees: most of these alleged ‘refugees’ – a term that has been used in conjunction with guilt-tripping media imagery to push the idea that we must accept mass migration is actually misleading. Most migrants are not refugees from Syria, many gain access to Europe in the guise of these refugees, but are only really interested in the ‘good life’ of welfare & benefits. This ‘refugee’ sham is used by the EU commissioners as an excuse to force EU states to accept these ‘refugees’ in massive, unlimited numbers out of liberal-backed sympathy, an emotional attachment that has silenced voices of reason on many platforms with dismissive buzz words like ‘racist’ that discourage in-depth debate.
Remainers argue constantly that we need this level of migration to fill in labour gaps and assure the receipt of skilled workers from abroad, however let us not forget that we can easily drop the current unhindered migration system that does not base itself on meritocratic bases, but destructively allows anyone free access – to a better, alternative system that is far more efficient & selective of people that are useful to our economy and have intentions beyond simply settling for the welfare benefits here. i.e. the Australian migration system which is points based and is nondiscriminatory.
Opposing view: The UK already has a points-based system for non-EU migrants and it is not clear why inventing a different system – with less flexibility – would be a good idea. – BBC ‘Reality Check’
Leave EU Response: Yes, we have a points system for non-EU migrants, however the whole Leave argument concerns introducing this points based system for all migrants everywhere, and not being discriminatory by reserving this points system to just migrants that are outside the EU, that is nonsensical.
The EU simply intends to encourage mass-immigration by keeping the union exempt of points-based migration policies. This emphasizes mass-migratory patterns that are unkempt and radical in their demeanor and favour the inducement of an excess of lower class workers for top flight corporations to absorb, it also accelerates the centralization of the EU as these migrants overwhelmingly tend to vote in bigger government.
The Membership Fee
The fee for membership is stated as:
The gross contribution in 2015 was £17.8bn but the UK rebate was worth £4.9bn – BBC
This means it cost us £12.9 billion/£350m a week last year to be a member of the EU club, money that could go towards our own national ambitions, and could have utterly eliminated the austerity measures imposed in recent years for example.
A remain argument suggests that:
After Brexit, the UK would still have to contribute to the EU budget to retain access to the single market.
While this is true, it would cost less than the current fees, and with Brexit we will have the freedom to trade with other global trade blocs, not just the EU (which is actually the slowest growing trade bloc in the world), the EU has been compared to a dead corpse that we have shackled ourselves to.
There is also a strong argument for the EU collapsing if we exit, other countries have suggested an interest in escaping and following the UK out of the door if Brexit follows through. This renders the misguided analogy of us being ‘outsiders’ void and null, as we can still trade with the EU post-Brexit and we regain our own independence in regards to negotiating trade deals with proven-to-be more prosperous trade blocs, it’s a win for the UK and its interests.
The International Relations Argument
Remainers have argued that we will somehow be cut afloat upon Brexit and be left to fend for ourselves…
It is this inwards, fear-mongering, herd-mentality, caricatured point of view that has garnered the wide support from swathes of the politically apathetic. As the 5th largest economy in the world, a huge global market for all trade blocs, the financial gateway of the world (City of London), and a wholly competent negotiator at the global table of diplomatic affairs, the UK absolutely stands a solid chance of breaking away from a Union that treats us as a mere appendage in its absurd, uncanny ambitions for a single state of Europe, and eventually a world government.
The reality is that the bureaucratic EU folk needs us more than we need them. It’s a classic gesture that is wholly applicable here, we are a key driving force in the EU’s success. The unelected few in Brussels rely largely on our funding, our influence, our active involvement in their failing project. Without us, the chance of the EU remaining intact is narrow, but remainers would love to perpetuate the ill-informed notion that the EU will somehow sustain itself after our departure, (it’s already very unstable) – and that we’re the ones that will fall afoul of some fabricated imaginary benefit if we do leave.
We’re joining the rest of the world
But it’s not that we’re leaving, it’s that we’re joining the rest of the world, the EU is practically a contrived cave of economic exclusivity, keeping the likes of rapidly growing global trade blocs and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) markets at arms length. To leave the EU is not a messy divorce, how can it be when we never agreed to this ‘marriage’ in the first place, the UK public never asked to be undemocratically ruled, there’s absolutely no obligation or guilt-bound sense of duty dictating that we must stay, so why stay?
A vote for Brexit is a vote for Britain, a vote for keeping our cultural roots intact, a vote for reconciling western differences with the rising East, and most importantly; a vote for our eternal right to democracy, liberty and making our own decisions.
The Sarmat’s silos will be protected by a unique “active protection measures” which will include 100 guns capable of firing a “metallic cloud” of forty thousand 30mm “bullets” to an altitude of up to 6km. The Russians are also planning to protect the Sarmat with their new S-500 air defense systems. Finally, the Sarmat’s preparation to start time will be under 60 seconds thanks a a highly automated launch system. What this all means is that the Sarmat missile will be invulnerable in its silo, during it’s flight and on re-entry in the lower parts of the atmosphere.
Unfortunately, the EU has outgrown its initial purpose of just smoothing trade barriers, it is now attributing unwarranted power to the little known, unelected 
The Spearhead Journal 
