The Worldwide Network of US Military Bases

Globalizing Imperialism: The Global Deployment of US Military Personnel.

Global Research Editor’s Note:

This important analysis and review of US military might by award winning Canadian geographer Professor Jules Dufour, was first published by Global Research in 2007. Jules Dufour passed away after a long illness in August 2017. 

US military presence around the World has expanded dramatically in the course of the last five years.  This study is largely based on data for the period 2001-2005.

The Worldwide control of humanity’s economic, social and political activities is under the helm of US corporate and military power. Underlying this process are various schemes of direct and indirect military intervention. These US sponsored strategies ultimately consist in a process of global subordination.

Where is the Threat?

The 2000 Global Report published in 1980 had outlined “the State of the World” by focusing on so-called  “level of threats” which might negatively influence or undermine US interests.

Twenty years later, US strategists, in an attempt to justify their military interventions in different parts of the World, have conceptualized the greatest fraud in US history, namely “the Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT). The latter, using a fabricated pretext  constitutes a global war against all those who oppose US hegemony. A modern form of slavery, instrumented through militarization and the “free market” has unfolded.

Major elements of the conquest and world domination strategy by the US refer to:

1) the control of the world economy and its financial markets,

2) the taking over of all natural resources (primary resources and nonrenewable sources of energy). The latter constitute the cornerstone of US power through the activities of its multinational corporations.

Geopolitical Outreach: Network of Military Bases

The US has established its control over 191 governments which are members of the United Nations. The conquest, occupation and/or otherwise supervision of these various regions of the World is supported by an integrated network of military bases and installations which covers the entire Planet (Continents, Oceans and Outer Space). All this pertains to the workings of  an extensive Empire, the exact dimensions of which are not always easy to ascertain.

Known and documented from information in the public domaine including Annual Reports of the US Congress, we have a fairly good understanding of the strucuture of US military expenditure, the network of US military bases and  the shape of this US military-strategic configuration in different regions of the World.

The objective of this article is to build a summary profile of the World network of military bases, which are under the jurisdiction and/or control  of the US. The spatial distribution of these military bases will be examined together with an analysis of the multibillion dollar annual cost of their activities.

In a second section of this article, Worldwide popular resistance movements directed against US military bases and their various projects will be outlined. In a further article we plan to analyze the military networks of other major nuclear superpowers including  the United Kingdom, France and Russia.

---

I. The Military Bases

Military bases are conceived for training purposes, preparation and stockage of military equipment, used by national armies throughout the World. They are not very well known in view of the fact that they are not open to the public at large. Even though they take on different shapes, according to the military function for which they were established; they can broadly be classified under four main categories :

a) Air Force Bases (see photos 1 and 2);

b) Army or Land Bases;

c) Navy Bases and

d) Communication and Spy Bases.

Photo 1. Air Base of Diego Garcia located in the Indian Ocean

Photo 2. Diego Garcia. An Aerial View of two B-52 and six Kc-a135

II. More than 1000 US Bases and/or Military Installations

The main sources of information on these military installations (e.g. C. Johnson, the NATO Watch Committee, the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases) reveal that the US operates and/or controls between 700 and 800 military bases Worldwide.

In this regard, Hugh d’Andrade and Bob Wing’s 2002 Map 1 entitled “U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World, The Cost of ‘Permanent War’”, confirms the presence of US military personnel in 156 countries.

The US Military has bases in 63 countries. Brand new military bases have been built since September 11, 2001 in seven countries.

In total, there are 255,065 US military personnel deployed Worldwide.

These facilities include a total of 845,441 different buildings and equipments. The underlying land surface is of the order of 30 million acres. According to Gelman, who examined 2005 official Pentagon data, the US is thought to own a total of 737 bases in foreign lands. Adding to the bases inside U.S. territory, the total land area occupied by US military bases domestically within the US and internationally is of the order of 2,202,735 hectares, which makes the Pentagon one of the largest landowners worldwide (Gelman, J., 2007).

Map 1. U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World. The Cost of «Permanent War» and Some Comparative Data

Source: http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=884

Map 2. The American Military Bases Around the World (2001-2003)

Source : http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/intervention/index.htm

Source : http://www.nobases.org

Map 3 US Military Bases Click here to see Map 3

The Map of the World Network “No Bases” (Map 3) reveals the following:

Based on a selective examination of military bases in North America, Latin America, Western Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan, several of these military bases are being used for intelligence purposes. New selected sites are Spy Bases and Satellite-related Spy Bases.

The Surface of the Earth is Structured as a Wide Battlefield

These military bases and installations of various kinds are distributed according to a Command structure divided up into five spatial units and four unified Combatant Commands (Map 4). Each unit is under the Command of a General.

The Earth surface  is being conceived as a wide battlefield which can be patrolled or steadfastly supervised from the Bases.

Map 4. The World and Territories Under the Responsibility of a Combatant Command or Under a Command Structure

Source : http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2009/0109_unifiedcommand

Territories under a Command are: the Northern Command (NORTHCOM) (Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado), the Pacific Command (Honolulu, Hawaii), the Southern Command (Miami, Florida – Map 5), The Central Command (CENTCOM) (MacDill Air Force Base, Florida), the European Command (Stuttgart-Vaihingen, Germany), the Joint Forces Command (Norfolk, Virginia), the Special Operations Command (MacDill Air Force Base, Florida), the Transportation Command (Scott Air Force Base, Illinois) and the Strategic Command (STRATCOM) (Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska).

Map 5. The Southern Command

Source : http://www.visionesalternativas.com/militarizacion/mapas/mapabases.htm

NATO Military Bases

The Atlantic Alliance (NATO) has its own Network of military bases, thirty in total. The latter are primarily located in Western Europe:

Whiteman, U.S.A., Fairford,
Lakenheath and Mildenhall in United Kingdom,
Eindhoven in Netherlands,
Brüggen, Geilenkirchen, Landsberg, Ramstein, Spangdahlem, Rhein-Main in Germany,
Istres and Avord in France.
Morón de la Frontera and Rota in Spain,
Brescia, Vicenza, Piacenza, Aviano, Istrana, Trapani, Ancora, Pratica di Mare, Amendola, Sigonella, Gioia dell Colle, Grazzanise and Brindisi in Italy,
Tirana in Albania,
Incirlik in Turkey,
Eskan Village in Soudi Arabia and
Ali al Salem in Koweit (http://www.terra.es/actualidad/articulo/html/act52501.html)

III. The Global Deployment of US Military Personnel

There are 6000  military bases and/ or military warehouses located in the U.S. (See Wikipedia, February 2007).

Total Military Personnel is of the order of  1,4 million of which 1,168,195 are in the U.S and US overseas territories.

Taking figures from the same source, there are 325,000 US military personnel in foreign countries:

800 in Africa,
97,000 in Asia (excluding the Middle East and Central Asia),
40,258 in South Korea,
40,045 in Japan,
491 at the Diego Garcia Base in the Indian Ocean,
100 in the Philippines, 196 in Singapore,
113 in Thailand,
200 in Australia,
and 16,601 Afloat.

In Europe, there are 116,000 US military personnel including 75,603 who are stationed in Germany.

In Central Asia about 1,000 are stationed at the Ganci (Manas) Air Base in Kyrgyzstan and 38 are located at Kritsanisi, in Georgia, with a mission to train Georgian soldiers.

In the Middle East (excludng the Iraq war theater) there are 6,000 US military personnel, 3,432 of whom are in Qatar and 1,496 in Bahrain.

In the Western Hemisphere, excluding the U.S. and US territories, there are 700 military personnel in Guantanamo, 413 in Honduras and 147 in Canada.

Map 3 provides information regarding military personnel on duty, based on a regional categorization (broad regions of the world). The total number of military personnel at home in the U.S. and/or in US Territories is 1,139,034. There are 1,825 in Europe 114, 660, 682 in Subsaharian Africa, 4, 274 in the Middle East and Southern Asia, 143 in the Ex-USSR, and 89,846 in the Pacific.

IV. The Operational Cost of the Worldwide Military Network

US defense spending (excluding the costs of the Iraq war) have increased from 404 in 2001 to 626 billion dollars in 2007 according to data from the Washington based Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. US defense spending is expected to reach 640 billion dollars in 2008.

(Figure 1 and http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/archives/002244.php ).

These 2006 expenses correspond to 3.7% of the US GDP and $935.64 per capita   (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of-the_United_States).

Figure 1. U.S. Military Expenditures since 1998

Source : http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp

According to Fig 1, the 396 billion dollars military budget proposed in 2003 has in fact reached 417.4 billion dollars, a 73% increase compared to 2000 (289 billion dollars). This outlay for 2003 was more than half of the total of the US discretionary budget.

Since 2003, these military expenditures have to be added to those of the Iraq war and occupation The latter reached in March 2007, according to the National Priorities Project, a cumulative total of 413 billion dollars.

(http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdi/jdi050504_1_n.shtml),

(http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182).

Estimates of the Defense Department budget needs, made public in 2006 in the DoD Green Book for FY 2007 are of the order of  440 billion dollars.
(http://www.dod.mil/comptroller/defbudget/fy2007/index.html)

Military and other staff required numbered 1,332,300. But those figures do not include the money required for the “Global World on Terrorism” (GWOT). In other words, these figures largely pertain to the regular Defense budget.

A Goldstein of the Washington Post, within the framework of an article on the aspects of the National 2007 budget titled «2007 Budget Favors Defense», wrote about this topic:

“Overall, the budget for the 2007 fiscal year would further reshape the government in the way the administration has been striving to during the past half-decade: building up military capacity and defenses against terrorist threats on U.S. soil, while restraining expenditures for many domestic areas, from education programs to train service”

(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/04/AR2006020401179.html).

V. US Military Bases to Protect Strategic Energy Resources

In the wake of 9/11, Washington initiated its “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq. Other countries, which were not faithfully obeying Washington’s directives including Iran, North Korea, Syria and Venezuela have been earmarked for possible US military intervention.

Washington keeps a close eye on countries opposed to US corporate control over their resources. Washington also targets countries where there are popular resistance movements directed against US interests, particularly in South America. In this context, President Bush made a quick tour to Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico «to promote democracy and trade» but also with a view to ultimately curbing and restraining popular dissent to the US interests in the region. .

(http://www.voanews.com/spanish/2007-03-08-voa1.cfm)

The same broad approach is being applied in Central Asia. According to Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC):

“The establishment of U.S. military bases should not of course be seen simply in terms of direct military ends. They are always used to promote the economic and political objectives of U.S. capitalism. For example, U.S. corporations and the U.S. government have been eager for some time to build a secure corridor for US.-controlled oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea in Central Asia through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. This region -has more than 6 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves and almost 40 percent of its gas reserves. The war in Afghanistan and the creation of U.S. military Bases in Central Asia are viewed as a key opportunity to make such pipelines a reality.”

(http://stopusa.be/campaigns/texte.php?section=FABN&langue=3&id=24157 ).

The US. are at War in Afghanistan and Iraq. They pursue these military operations until they reach their objective which they call “VICTORY”. According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deployment_of-the_U.S.-Military), American troops fighting in these countries number 190,000.  The “Enduring Freedom” Operation in Iraq alone has almost 200,000 military personnel, including 26,000 from other countries participating to the US sponsored “Mission”. About 20,000 more could join other contingents in the next few months. In Afghanistan, a total of 25,000 soldiers participate to the operation (Map 6 and Map 7).

Map  6.  Petroleum and International Theatre of War in the Middle East and Central Asia

Source : Eric Waddell, The Battle for Oil, Global Research, 2003

Source : http://www.heartland.it/

Map 8. Oil Fields in Latin America

Source : http://www.visionesalternativas.com/militarizacion/mapas/mapahegem.htm

VI. Military Bases Used for the Control of Strategic Renewable Resources

US Military Bases in foreign countries, are mainly located in Western Europe: 26 of them are in Germany, 8, in Great Britain, and 8 in Italy. There are nine military installations in Japan (Wikepedia).

In the last few years, in the context of the GWOT, the US haa built 14 new bases in and around the Persian Gulf.

It is also involved in construction and/or or reinforcement of 20 bases (106 structured units as a whole) in Iraq, with costs  of the order of 1.1 billion dollars in that country alone (Varea, 2007) and the use of about ten bases in Central Asia.

The US has also undertaken continued negotiations with several countries to install, buy, enlarge or rent an addional number of military bases. The latter pertain inter alia to installations in Morocco, Algeria, Mali, Ghana, Brazil and Australia (See Nicholson, B., 2007), Poland, Czech Republic (Traynor, I., 2007), Ouzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Kirghizstan, Italy (Jucca, L., 2007) and France.

Washington has signed an agreement to build a military base in Djibouti (Manfredi, E., 2007). All these initiatives are a part of an overall plan to install a series of military bases geographically located in a West-East corridor extending from Colombia in South America, to North Africa, the Near East, Central Asia and as far as the Philippines (Johnson, C., 2004). The US bases in South American are related to the control and access to the extensive natural biological , mineral and water resources resources of the Amazon Basin. (Delgado Jara, D., 2006 and Maps 9 and 10).

Map 9. The Biological Wealth of Latin America

Source : http://www.visionesalternativas.com/militarizacion/mapas/mapahegem.htm

Map 10. Freshwater Resources in Latin America

Source : http://www.visionesalternativas.com/militarizacion/mapas/mapahegem.htm

VII. Resistance Movements

The network of US military bases is strategic, located in prcximity of traditional strategic resources including nonrenewable sources of energy. This military presence has brought about political opposition and resistance from progressive movements and antiwar activists.

Demonstrations directed against US military presence has developed in Spain, Ecuador, Italy, Paraguay, Uzbekistan, Bulgaria and in many other countries. Moreover, other long-termer resistance movements directed against US military presence have continued in South Korea, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, Cuba, Europe, Japan and other locations.

The Worldwide resistance to US foreign military bases has grown during the last few years. We are dealing with an International Network for the Abolition of US Military Bases.

Such networks’ objective is to broadly pursue disarmament, demilitarization processes Worldwide as well as dismantle US military bases in foreign countries.

The NO BASES Network organizes educational campaigns to sensitize public opinion.  It also works to rehabilitate abandoned military sites, as in the case of Western Europe.

These campaigns, until 2004, had a local and national impact.

The network is now in a position to reach people Worldwide. The network itself underscores that “much can be gained from greater and deeper linkages among local and national campaigns and movements across the globe. Local groups around the world can learn and benefit from sharing information, experiences, and strategies with each other”

(http://www.no-bases.org/index.php?mod=network&bloque=1&idioma=en )

“The realisation that one is not alone in the struggle against foreign bases is profoundly empowering and motivating. Globally coordinated actions and campaigns can highlight the reach and scale of the resistance to foreign military presence around the world. With the trend of rising miniaturization and resort to the use of force around the world, there is now an urgent and compelling need to establish and strengthen an international network of campaigners, organisations, and movements working with a special and strategic focus on foreign military presence and ultimately, working towards a lasting and just system of peace»

(http://www.no-bases.org/index.php?mod=network&bloque=1&idioma=en )

The Afghanistan and Iraq wars have, in this regard, created a favourable momentum, which has contributed to the reinforcement of the movement to close down US military bases in foreign countries:

“At the time of an International anti-war meeting held in Jakarta in May 2003, a few weeks after the start of the Iraq invasion, a global anti-military Bases campaign has been proposed as an action to priorize among global anti-war, justice and solidarity movements»  (http://www.no-bases.org/index.php?mod=network&bloque=1&idioma=en).

Since then, the campaign has acquired greater recognition. E-mail lists have been compiled (nousbases@lists.riseup.net  and nousbases-info@lists.riseup.net ) that permit the diffusion of the movement members experiences and information and discussion exchanges. That list now groups 300 people and organizations from 48 countries. A Web site permits also to adequately inform all Network members. Many rubrics provide highly valuable information on ongoing activities around the World.

http://www.no-bases.org/index.php?mod=network&bloque=1&idioma=en

In addition, the Network is more and more active and participates in different activities. At the World Social Forums it organized various conferences and colloquia. It was present at the European Social Forum held in Paris in 2003 and in London in 2004 as well as at the the America’s Social Forum in Ecuador in 2004, and at the Mediterranean Social Forum in Spain in 2005.

One of the major gatherings, which was held in Mumbai, India, in 2004, was within the framework of the World Social Forum. More than 125 participants from 34 countries defined the foundations of a coordinated global campaign.

Action priorities were identified, such as the determination of a global day of action aiming at underscoring major issues stemming from the existence of US military bases. The Network also held four discussion sessions at the Porto Alegre Social Forum in 2005. One of those pertained to the financing of the Network’s activities.

It is important to recall that the Network belongs to the Global Peace Movement. Justice and Peace organizations have  become more sensitized on what was at stake regarding US military bases.

Map 11. Social and Resistence Movements in Latin America

Source : http://www.visionesalternativas.com/militarizacion/mapas/mapahegem.htm

The Quito and Manta International Conference, Ecuador, March 2007

A Network World Conference for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases was held at Quito and at Manta, Ecuador, from March 5 to 9 2007

(http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:SmEvQwFUeiAJ:www.abolishbases.org/pdf/CalltoEcuadorFlyer-Francais.pdf+R%C3%A9seau+mondial+des+bases+militaires&hl=fr&gl=ca&ct=clnk&cd=3&lr=lang_fr ).

The objective of the Conference was to underscore the political, social, environmental and economic impacts of US military bases, to make known the principles of the various Anti-Bases movements and to formally build the Network, its strategies, structure and Action Plans. The main objectives of the Conference were the following:

–           Analyze the role of Foreign Military Bases and other features of military presence associated to the global dominance strategy and their impacts upon population and environment;

–           Share experiences and reinforce the built solidarity resulting from the resistance battles against Foreign military Bases around the World;

–           Reach a consensus on objectives mechanisms, on action plans, on coordination, on communication and on decision making of a Global Network for the abolition of all Foreign military Bases and of all other expressions of military presence; and

–            Establish global action plans to fight and reinforce the resistance of local people and ensure that these actions are being coordinated at the international level.

Conclusion

This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power.

The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality.

Humanity is being controlled  and enslaved by this Network of US military bases. .

The ongoing re-deployment of US troops and military bases has to be analyzed in a thorough manner if we wish to understand the nature of US interventionism  in different regions of the World.

This militarization process is characterized by armed aggression and warfare, as well as interventions called “cooperation agreements”. The latter reaffirmed America’s economic design design in the areas of trade and investment practices. Economic development is ensured through the miniaturization or the control of governments and organizations. Vast resources are thereby expended and wasted in order to allow such control to be effective, particularly  in regions which have a strategic potential in terms of wealth and resources and which are being used to consolidate the Empire’s structures and functions.

The setting up of the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases turns out to be an extraordinary means to oppose the miniaturization process of the Planet. Such Network is indispensable and its growth depends on a commitment of all the People of the World. It will be extremely difficult to mobilize them, but the ties built up by the Network among its constituent resistance movements are a positive element, which is ultimately conducive to more cohesive and coordinated battle at the World level.

The Final Declaration of the Second International Conference against Foreign Military Bases which was held in Havana in November 2005 and was endorsed by delegates from 22 countries identifies most of the major issues, which confront mankind. This Declaration constitutes a major peace initiative. It establishes  international solidarity in the process of  disarmament.

Washington May Plan to Nuke Russia and China

The possibility of a preemptive nuclear strike on Russia and China is an approach shortlisted by Washington Deep Statesmen amidst Globalist fears of slipping control.

Despite the best laid plans of Globalist mass psy-ops, funded terrorist organisations, ‘collateral damages’, and so on, the Global Elites realise they must up-the-ante to reach their goals to cripple the last superpower international opposition. With Russia and China out of the equation, there are no barriers to world government.

This increasingly aggressive stance has further escalated following the moment the Russian central bank opened its first overseas office in Beijing on March 14th this year, marking a step forward in forging a Beijing-Moscow alliance to bypass the US dollar in the global monetary system, and to phase-in a gold-backed standard of trade.

Nuclear War being prepared for:

Paul Craig Roberts explained in-detail the Globalist’s preparation for a possible surprise last-resort take-down on his website.

Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir, Deputy Head of Operations of the Russian General Staff has concluded that Washington in pursuit of global hegemony is implementing an anti-ballistic missile system that Washington believes can prevent a Russian nuclear response to a US pre-emptive attack. http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/04/us-forces-preparing-sudden-nuclear.html

Careful studies have convinced the Russians that Washington is investing in and arranging components that have no other function than to devastate Russia and cripple the country’s retaliatory capability. In short, Washington is preparing to launch a nuclear war. https://www.rt.com/news/386276-us-missile-shield-russia-strike/

The amassing US militants in the South China Sea/Korean peninsula/Japan suggests that the US may be poised for a direct invasion of East Asia through North Korea as a hotbed trigger point, the invasion follow-through would lead into China and its other respective satellites in the case of the big showdown; if it gets the final go-ahead by the deep state neo-con shadow government.

It comes down to this, Washington is sufficiently criminally insane to risk the destruction of life on earth based on the supposition that Washington’s offence will work perfectly and Russia and China’s capabilities will be so degraded that no retaliatory response will occur.

Where then is the hope? Russia and China cannot simply sit there and await America’s preemptive nuclear strike, bit by bit their position is weakened to the point the weighing scales of power are irreversibly against them, luckily they are taking action to secure themselves at all levels.

• China is currently escalating its military presence in the South China Sea. China aims to extend its military reach into the South China Sea and Western Pacific in such a way that it can effectively control who can — and cannot — enter those regions.
• China launches new aircraft carrier, April 2017. It is not expected to be operational until 2020 and will carry China’s Shenyang J-15 fighter jets.
• Vladimir Putin, in late 2016, posted nuclear weapons in far-east Siberia, well within range of Western-coast US states & their major cities.
• 2016, Russia deploys Baltic missile system in response to US missile system in Eastern Europe.
• Vladimir Putin, in 2016, has stationed nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad, Russia’s Baltic exclave in Europe, well within range of all major European cities.
• ~330,000 Russian soldiers are currently stationed on Moscow’s western border as the Russian satellites lean towards Western control.
• Iran and Russia are moving closer together in their military alliance, working to boost ties and coordination in Syria and elsewhere in the region following the U.S. decision to launch a military strike in Syria, according to regional reports and experts.
• The Middle East and Syria – where Russia has staged its first large-scale military action outside the borders of the former Soviet Union since communism.
• Russia seizes Crimea in 2014 in a bid to secure adjacent waters in the Black Sea following US-led & funded manipulation of Ukrainian politics. The Russian taking of Crimea prevents the US from building extensive naval presence in the region, and defends an important Russian pipeline into the EU.
• Russia is making provisions for economic immunity from Western sanctions, especially following the US orchestrated oil crisis that battered the Russian economy. The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) marks a big step towards gold-backed currencies in the far-East, this is undoubtedly a move towards financial independence, free of the shackles of the USD. Putin seeks to include China, India, Iran (among others) in this arrangement.

On the US continuing to expand their missile infrastructure, despite the signing of the nuclear deal with Iran. “The threat is gone, but the creation of the missile defense system is continuing.” — Vladimir Putin

China creates island territory in the South China Sea region.

Possibly Washington does not intend to conduct a preemptive nuclear strike, but only to convince Russia and China that Washington’s preparations give Washington so much predominance in a conflict that Russia and China will submit to Washington’s hegemony. But this interpretation of Washington’s intention implies no less risk. Why would Russia and China wait for Washington to complete its preparations for war, preparations that permit Washington to turn Russia and China into puppet states? The above listed actions from Russia and China details their counter-measures to retain global balance.

Trump, under threat of impeachment must do the bidding of the Elite or face prosecution and personal reputation-obliterating scandal.

During a Syrian air force attack on an ISIS position, a chemical weapon exploded, or so it is alleged. Instantly Washington said that Assad had used “Sarin gas against his own people.” Trump was shown photos of dead babies and stupidly ordered a US military strike against Syria.

This action against Syria can be classified as a war-crime, as arbitrarily bombing a sovereign nation without any legal oversight is categorically in contravention to Geneva convention statutes.

As a result, the Deep state can and probably have already swarmed forth, and eagerly used this set-up as blackmail ammunition to force Trump into becoming yet another puppet, else risk his personal reputation in a scandal that would see his impeachment. The Presidency is once again under Globalist control, hence why Trump is now distancing himself from his campaign promises.

“I am a nationalist and a Globalist.” — Donald J. Trump, April 2017

Trump under extreme neo-con pressure to take action in middle-east as Globalist-funded terrorist group, ISIS, loses big-time in war to oust Assad.

According to White House sources who spoke to Infowars, Trump is reticent to see U.S. troops embroiled in yet another Middle East quagmire, but is under pressure from top neo-cons in his administration to prevent Russia from dominating the region as the fall of ISIS nears. Trump has been isolated and surrounded by a Globalist dominated cabinet.

End-game plan to strike down the last opposing superpowers in one fell swoop.

One might hope that the American and Western populations would be outraged that Washington is so power-crazed that Washington is subjecting all life to such risks. But there is no sign of an anti-war movement. The Western left-wing has degenerated into obsession with pointless information such as ‘Identity Politics’ in which the only threat comes from white heterosexual males who are portrayed as misogynists, racists, and homophobes.

The Western left-wing is no longer war-conscious. Indeed, the left-wing has become diverted into such silly irrelevancies as transgender rights to toilets of their choice. The impotence of the Western left is so overwhelming that the left might as well not exist.

---

The decades-long tug-of-war to break the last independent sources of oil & other important natural resources, namely the states of Iran and Syria, both who have chosen to not trade in the medium of the US dollar as world reserve currency, is a struggle between the single-currency one-world globalist vision of the US Empire, and the last truly nationally leaning powers; Russia and China.

If Russia – the world’s fourth largest gold producer after China, Japan and the US – is set to become a major supplier of gold to China, the probability of a scenario hinted by many over the years, namely that Beijing is preparing to eventually unroll a gold-backed currency, increases by orders of magnitude.

The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union is the East’s answer to increasing Western economic sanctions and pressures, when backed into a corner, the Eastern superpowers must work together, or face economic bullying that will eventually bring them down.

“It is a bloc meant to rival the European Union and the United States in its influence in Russia’s near abroad.” — Stratfor

The dollar is not gold backed, and is printed out of thin air by the Federal Reserve, as long as the petrodollar system exists, the US has infinite funds at its disposal.

In an attempt to turn the tables, China and Russia are shifting away from dollar-based trade, to commerce which will eventually be backstopped by gold, or what is gradually emerging as an Eastern gold standard, one shared between Russia and China, and which may one day backstop their respective currencies.

The imperialistic petrodollar system relies on international cooperation through military coercion and bullying, first a financial offer will be made, if that is rejected military intervention takes place, i.e. Libya, Iraq etc. 

#NOWARINSYRIA: IF YOU DON’T WANT WORLD WAR III IN THE MIDDLE EAST YOU NEED TO LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD NOW

Article from End of the American Dream.

We are closer to the start of World War III than we have been in decades.  In part 3 of this series of articles, I discussed the fact that President Trump’s team was preparing a “military response” in Syria and that a “coalition” is being formed to remove Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power.  Well, as I am writing this article the missiles have started flying.  Cruise missiles from a U.S. Navy vessel in the Mediterranean Sea have hit multiple targets inside Syria, and many fear that what we have just witnessed could be the beginning of a broader conflict.

Trump should not have done this, because according to the U.S. Constitution the president needs the approval of Congress to go to war.  Fortunately there are still a few members of Congress that still care about the Constitution and that are bold enough to point out this fact.  One of those members of Congress is U.S. Senator Rand Paul…

Earlier on Thursday, Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) announced he would oppose any military action without a vote in Congress.

“The President, if he decides to do something in Syria, he would come to Congress and ask for a declaration of war. Short of Congress voting on it, I’m opposed to illegal and unconstitutional wars,” Paul told Fox News radio show ‘Kilmeade and Friends’.

Now that the missiles have started flying, it may be too late to stop this war from happening.

But that does not mean that we shouldn’t try to stop it.  Now is the time to raise our voices and to let Donald Trump know that we do not want this war.

And what is especially tragic about all of this is that Donald Trump is taking us to war because of a misunderstanding.  Rand Paul’s father, former presidential candidate Ron Paul, is among many that believe that there was “zero chance” that Assad would have deliberately used chemical weapons against those innocent people…

Pointing out that the prospect of peace in Syria was moving closer before the attack, with ISIS and Al-Qaeda on the run, Paul said the attack made no sense.

“It looks like maybe somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode,” said Paul, asking, “who benefits?”

“It doesn’t make any sense for Assad under these conditions to all of a sudden use poison gases – I think there’s zero chance he would have done this deliberately,” said Paul.

As I discussed in part 1 of this series, the incident in Syria’s Idlib province on Tuesday was almost certainly a false flag attack that was designed to pull the United States and other western powers into the war.

And since I wrote that article, more evidence that this was a false flag attack has continued to emerge…

Evidence which has emerged in the aftermath of the attack at Khan Sheikhoun indicates that not only was the nature of the attack misreported by the media, but that certain individuals on the ground in Syria may have had foreknowledge of the attack up to several days before it happened. On April 3rd, 2017, an anti-Assad journalist tweeted that the next day he would be launching a media campaign to cover airstrikes on the Hama countryside, including the use of chemical weapons. It is not clear how the reporter was able to know that chemical weapons would be used an entire day before the attacks occurred.

Observers further noted that on April 1st, 2017, a doctor on the ground in Khan Sheikhoun, Dr. Shajul Islam, had received several shipments of gas masks in the days running up to the chemical incident. The revelations on Twitter fueled speculation that opposition figures were aware of the chemical attack days before it actually happened, contesting the narrative that the Syrian government was responsible. Daily Mail has reported that Dr. Shajul Islam was at one point sought by the British government in connection with the abduction of two journalists in Syria, and security services have stated that Islam and his brother may have had ties to ISIS executioner “Jihadi John.”

In addition, it is very interesting to note that the “White Helmets” were ready and waiting with their cameras to film the attack when it happened.  The White Helmets are funded by George Soros and they have been closely affiliated with al-Qaeda in the past.  They very much want to see Assad removed from power, and so they would greatly benefit from the U.S. getting involved in the war in Syria.

And let us not forget that it turned out that Assad had absolutely nothing to do with the infamous “chemical attack” that he originally got the blame for in 2013…

The narrative for the August 2013 attack in Ghouta, which Barack Obama cited as the pretext for a long awaited U.S. attack on government targets in aid of jihadist rebels, completely collapsed after it emerged that the casualties were the result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling chemical weapons provided to them by Saudi Arabia.

The United Nations’ Carla Del Ponte also said that evidence suggested rebels had used sarin nerve gas.

As journalist Seymour Hersh reported in December 2013, intelligence officials told him that the entire narrative was a “ruse” and that “the attack was not the result of the current regime.”

If Donald Trump would have just waited until all the facts were known, it is quite likely that he would have seen that there was absolutely no need to attack Syria at all.  This is something that I discussed on the Alex Jones Show on Thursday, and hopefully we can spread this information far and wide before it is too late.

Because if the U.S. does something very foolish in Syria, there is a very real possibility that it could actually cause World War III to erupt.  I included the following quote in part 3 of this series, but I want to share it again because it shows how much is at stake.  According to The Intercept, one of the military options that has been presented to Trump is a “saturation strike” that would result “in Russian military deaths”…

The proposed strike would involve launching Tomahawk cruise missiles to overwhelm Russian air defense systems used by the Syrian military. The Russian government currently helps maintain the air defense sites and advises the Syrian military.

According to both U.S. military officials, the current proposal would likely result in Russian military deaths and mark a drastic escalation of U.S. force in Syria.

One U.S. military official said the decision to allow the strikes, which would kill Russians, signals a significant change in policy by the Trump administration. A decision by Trump to go forward with the plan would be a reversal from the Obama administration, which denied multiple air strike proposals  that would likely cause Russian personnel casualties in Syria.

I cannot even begin to describe how foolish it would be for Trump to make such a move.

Hopefully Trump will stop listening so much to his generals and will begin to listen to some common sense.

When Obama was considering military action against Syria in 2013, Trump strongly urged him not to do it…

In one September 5, 2013 all-caps rant, Trump tweeted, “AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA – IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!”

“Don’t attack Syria – an attack that will bring nothing but trouble for the U.S. Focus on making our country strong and great again!” Trump tweeted four days later.

During the presidential campaign, Trump also bashed Hillary Clinton for her disastrous foreign policy, tweeting, “Crooked Hillary Clintons foreign interventions unleashed ISIS in Syria, Iraq and Libya. She is reckless and dangerous!”

Trump was right on the money when he originally said those things, and hopefully he will go back and read those tweets and take his own advice.

We live at a time when the world is becoming increasingly unstable, and many of the things that I have been warning about for a very long time are starting to come to pass.

Nothing good is going to come out of an attack on Syria.  Other than “looking tough”, there is nothing to be gained for the United States, but there is so much that could go tragically wrong.

In 2013, the American people very loudly let Barack Obama know that they did not want a war with Syria.

If we want to stop a war with Syria in 2017, we need to be even louder than last time, because President Trump seems determined to act very quickly.

So if you do not want us to go to war with Syria, raise your voice right now, because tomorrow might be too late.

Debt Slavery

The monetary system in place enslaves us. It manipulates prices, inflates, contorts, contrives; it creates the illusion of sparsity where there is abundance, bottlenecks fruitfulness and pushes upon us austerity without due cause, except the elitist notion that a proletariat populace can be controlled.

Globalist Economics

This monetary system is based on fractional reserve currency, it is based on creating money where there is none, a constantly raised debt-ceiling that cannot ever be paid back. The passive populace consents to this, materialistic complacency satisfies the suppressed average man, we think our basic needs are enough, we are told we live in the lap of luxury; that we should not dare look beyond our white picket fences, to not think outside the box that is played to us on repeat.

Manufactured consent through heavy indoctrination allows the big government to play God, while we aimlessly wallow in our material possessions, submissive, dumb, valueless, and utterly swindled.

The artificial debt bubble is ever-growing, upheld by a dependency on the US petrodollar via the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, which firmly established the U.S. Dollar as the global reserve currency, after the  1971 Nixon Shock when the United States abandoned the international gold standard. This arrogant, superlative status as reserve currency is enforced by a US-NATO combined military unimaginably powerful (Budget of around USD 600 billion). This is all reinforced through the back-channels of sanctions and deals that pull the global strings. However, the controllers know this debt bubble will have to burst eventually, as a boom-bust system must be fulfilled, unless…

“The collapse of the petrodollar system, which I believe will occur sometime within this decade, will make the 1971 Nixon Shock look like a dress rehearsal.” — Jerry Robinson @FTMDaily

According to radio show host and political activist, Bill Cooper, in order to avoid a complete financial collapse that would end the possibility of world government, they must bring about cashless currency, a single, centralised point of monetary control. Either that, or initiate a cataclysmic world war to mask the collapse.

This cashless system will prevent or mask the system from collapsing, this is because digits typed onto a screen constitutes the ultimate form of money-manipulation. This is because it shifts from the untraceable status of hard, cold cash to something completely controllable.

To reach this point, they must masterfully manufacture consent, they seek to wage this war on the people without firing a single bullet. According to Bill Cooper, they work in the shadows devising plans decades in advance, so to always be many steps ahead of the people they seek to deceive.

Manufactured Consent:

In order to get their own way, the Globalist elite must eradicate the sacrosanct, foundation-stone, unalienable rights and values held by the majority of people in the West. Once constitutionalism is broken, the ability for the globalists to do what they want will be a reality.

The U.S. Constitution, an inherently libertarian doctrine, details natural law as sovereign, this is the law of God, Biblical scripture is at its very basis, proposing that the rulers of man are subject to the laws of God, i.e. the right to bear arms.

These values are held relatively strongly in the West, which is arguably the last bastion of constitutional freedom and liberty – in order for the Socialist-Marxist Globalists to overturn this, they must gradually and tactfully employ numerous, underhanded methods, including;

• Mass-importation, integration, and acceptance of people that have never known liberty, and thus will not defend said liberty/constitutional values. This is being actively seen with the current migrant crisis in Europe, an effort by cultural Marxists to eradicate Western values and lower the bar enough for them to seize control over the world’s sovereign nations, this is because these people will vote for socialist-establishment candidates and work for next to nothing, pushing down wage standards, living standards and also the standards of everything else, including the standards the people hold the governing body accountable to. With western men feminised (read on for more), the still-masculine third world people will quickly out-breed the remaining bloodlines that still hold onto constitutional values, cultural and social replacement in action.
• Cultural engineering to uplift anti-liberty trends and customs as popular, the use of all levels of media production to push the agenda of socialist-Marxist Globalism is rife, and used to inculcate and indoctrinate people to lean towards socialist-Marxist policies, these are policies that whittle away national sovereignty and encourage passiveness, servitude and apathy.
• Pushing for race division to portray ‘whiteness’ (liberty) as regressive and oppressive, this silences the dissenting voices from the predominantly white demographic, an ethnic group that on the whole, holds the most progressive values. If you shut down the native holders of constitutional values into a corner while piling in millions of regressive, third-world Islamic people, you can culturally overwrite & thus destroy the values, history and status (success/opulence) that ‘whiteness’ (which is really just the success of good values, race has nothing to do with it) has historically exuded and sought to share with everybody else. You’ll notice bans on confederate flags, a section of white culture branded as ‘racist’ yet the truth is that all cultures have had turbulent pasts, the socialist-Marxist objective is to target and eradicate cultures with Biblical and constitutional adherence.
• Pushing an ostensibly ‘innocent’ and virtuous looking brand of politics that underhandedly brings socialistic, soft-imperialist politics to the forefront. The sheer lack of transparency in politics today is signified by the example of the idea that the EU will benefit the constituents ostensibly, the case is actually the opposite, member states are forced to cede their sovereign control, resources and influence to the Brussels-ruled bloc. The result is a socialist-inclined superstate ruled by the unelected few. A smaller version of what world government will eventually look like.
• Acceptance of women as dominant, and men as submissive, in a charade that is marketed to appear progressive and liberal, the globalist efforts to ‘break the stereotypes’ of women as the submissive sex/vice versa for men, is undoubtedly a charlatan effort to undermine the sacred masculine energy (action and pursuit), an energy that threatens the globalist plans to seize control over the world. Remove the rebellious man from the equation, and you can take/do anything you want. The spreading of harmful chemicals through food/water influences bodily chemistry to turn men and women gay, in order to mask this noticeable change the Globalists have launched pro-gay campaigns to make it look like this mass ‘coming-out’ is due to a social movement, and not their sly chemical warfare. Popular culture also leans towards this contrived notion, the new starwars portrays Rey as a ‘strong female’ lead, there is even a scene where she openly rejects a male characters’ chivalrous advance.
• Overturning the distinction of gender, in order to oust the secure concept of a masculine sex and a feminine sex, which something essential to a stable, natural world, the globalists have pushed a widespread campaign of LGBT. They seek to reinforce a broad, obscure spectrum of gender rather than the idea of two clear-cut genders. This will ruin the family structure, which is something that will damage a child’s biological development, without a clear mother/father the child will biologically turn to the state for parenting, in an appeal for a stronger role model. If you can make something as absolute as gender transient and vague, then you can overturn something as absolute as the constitution.
• Feminising everything to overload the world with feminine energy. If this is achieved, people will be more inclined to emotional decision-making (feminine trait) rather than logical decision-making (a masculine trait). If people become too caring and non-pragmatic, the inclination is to vote socialist. It is asserted by Stefan Molyneux that women lean towards socialist politics. This is simply because they are naturally drawn to a figure that provides for them, in this case the government. Women love safety nets, it is a biological default, a predilection for security in the upbringing of a prospective child, when you overtly emphasise femininity, you very quickly get socialist politics to emerge.
• Pushing a culture of giving in to temptation and our animal impulses. To concede to your animal nature is to give up on higher consciousness, and as a result become little more than an animal to be herded, regulated and controlled. Rudimentary impulses are predictable and easy to manipulate, for example, with the animal reaction of fear; the ‘fight and flight‘ reaction was utilised in the 9/11 event, a staged terrorist attack that rallied public support behind the consecutive wars in the middle-east. When your reptilian brain is constantly activated (the constant sensationalism of the mainstream media keeps our fear consistently piqued) we are in a state of low-functioning, panicked, reactionary decision-making, it suppresses our capacity for original, critical thought and favours the survival instinct, an instinct that overrides our ability to process the situation accurately, we naturally lash out in fear without really understanding the situation. This case of human nature is being constantly used against us, to great effect for the globalists.
• An obsession with racial classification, the mainstream media’s obsession with classifying race is repugnant, constantly portraying blacks as underdogs being persecuted by whites (yet black-on-black crime is the real oppressor), having an obsession with racism and not ‘offending’ somebody else’s cultural roots, even if their culture is by fact, morally inferior. This media narrative favours and protects decadent cultures, it classifies and divides while spitting on ‘white’ western culture by cherry-picking, and magnifying eras of oppression, and ignoring the great advantages of constitutionalism. Simply by repeatedly outlining racial differences, the media fuels racial tension, a classic divide & conquer scheme.

Trump Win Astounds

Donald J. Trump has been made President-elect in a historically successful, albeit contentious bid to attain the highest office in US government. What are the implications?

Donald Trump’s victory is (likely) a victory for ordinary, decent people against a corrupt establishment. It is a victory for peace against war and for cooperation over confrontation.

Trump’s triumphant win could mark the reversing point of globalist momentum in Western seats of power, and maybe even restore the bilateral mutuality of peaceful nation-states capable of working alongside one another; a world view held in admiration by Trump and other apparently non-Globalist leaning world leaders; especially in regards to cooperating with Russia’s Vladimir Putin, this could see the cooling of middle eastern escalation, the end of ISIS, and the (indefinite) restoration of world peace.

Obama’s remaining time in office leaves significant uncertainty.

Barack Obama, a globalist puppet, will remain in office until Trump assumes the post in January of 2017, this leaves a short period by which Obama and his shadow affiliates could trigger catastrophe that would preserve his (and their) position; theories vary, but a global conflict masking an overdue financial collapse may be prompted to alleviate the due process of US democracy; thus preventing Trump from actually taking office.

Trump: “Drain the Swamp”

Donald Trump’s recent allusive comments in regards to ‘draining the swamp’ directly refer to the blatant corruption in circles of power in the US government. Hopefully, Trump actually delivers in ousting the bad eggs and jailing Clinton; proving his oft iterated statements are not hot air rhetoric, this should be something he capitalises on doing in his promises to voters.

Trump could backtrack, or worse; be an establishment candidate in heavy disguise.

The possibility does remain that Trump; who was friendly with the Clintons at one point (and may still be behind closed doors), may simply be a ‘goalpost’ changer in a crafty Globalist effort to refresh the dynasties from the worn-out Clinton & Bush era of politics to some newer faces.

I fear Trump may be a perpetuation of the controller’s paradigm. Yes, even despite Trump’s eagerness to demonstrate his ‘outsider’ background; this could very easily be the same approach used underhandedly by Globalists needing a new political dynasty to control the people, a changing of masks per se.

10 Stances that suggest Trump is not a Globalist

1. Trump’s opposition to TTIP, a highly globalist oriented trade deal favouring big corporations over the people, poised to cede job opportunities and fill the coffers of the rich implies that Mr. Trump may have the people in mind before his money.
2. Trump’s concern over regressive cultural Marxism that opposes Western values, Trump’s interest in retaining the populism of progressive western values defined by constitutionalism and liberty in the US by repelling groups that (in majority) do not generally hold these values at heart; many middle-eastern Islam adherents who have only known regressive cultural principles suggests that Trump gives emphasis to the unimpeachable standards of liberty and the basic inalienable freedoms that we are entitled to, and that may be eroded with an electorate drastically changed by over acceptance and mass migration.
3. Trump’s opposition to toxic substances in vaccines and their ill effect on health: Trump’s disgust for what he addresses as autism-causing vaccines opposes the Goliath pharmaceutical corporations; once again suggesting that he is not an establishment or vested interest beholden candidate.
4. Trump’s admiration of,  and desire to work with Vladimir Putin: The fact Trump likes the Russians speaks volumes in a country with a media so vehemently anti-Russian, Putin has been incessantly painted as a tyrannical figure by Globalist funded outlets, this changes with Trump who claims to not seek confrontation, but amicable partnership with them.
5. Trump’s staunch constitutionalism: This speaks for itself, this is a man that triumphs the very thing that makes the West great, limited government that should always be held accountable for its actions, should serve the people and not itself or any vested interest, and should be challenged at every turn and motion. “Defend the Second Amendment of our Constitution. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.”
6. Trump’s adherence to faith: As a professed man of the Bible in a West where faith is dying, Trump is humble enough and modest enough to realise there is more than himself while not forcing that faith on others. This contradicts the gross egoism of the Globalists; and is a role-model example that is surely to set the States on a course towards moral enlightenment and greater integrity and self discipline. The Satanic globalists, google ‘Spirit Cooking’ – are the exact opposite of this, even if they openly deny it.
7. Trump’s ‘Pro-Gun’ stance: Trump has vowed to uphold all of the constitution, the right to purchase and bear arms is factored into this sacrosanct, legally binding document. It is something that, unlike the Globalists, Trump supports and endorses to the core; looks like 8 years of Obama grinding down at gun rights has not come to much fruition. The venerable right to overthrow a corrupt government with arms is recognised by Trump, else he would be trying to get rid of armaments, too, just like his corrupt predecessors have.
8. Trump has been outspoken against the inanity of the ‘liberal’ PC culture: Once again demonstrably illustrating Trump as a man not concerned with the self-entitled safe-space, victimised mental blocks that permit far more harm than conciliation; it is a big sign that he is not one of the establishment.
9. Trump eats organic: Defying big corporate lobbyists such as Monsanto that promote pesticides and GMOs, Donald Trump and his family allegedly live off of an organic diet and know the importance of good health on the well being of a person.“@mygreenhippo #BenCarson is now leading in the #polls in #Iowa. Too much #Monsantoin the #corn creates issues in the brain? #Trump #GOP“ — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 22, 2015
10. Trump endorses Brexit & Nationalism: the very opposite of globalism, the elites would have us pin nationalism to Nazi Germany, but both Donald Trump and Nigel Farage have portrayed nationalism as a positive celebration of culture and independence while still co-operating with other states.

NATO build-up on Russian Border

Poking the Russian bear has never been a wise move; but once again history repeats itself, NATO has given the go-ahead for a mass military build-up on the Russian border with Estonia, Norway and other Eastern European states, harkening back to the ilk of the cold war era rhetoric of brinkmanship provocation, and the teetering edge malarkey that many know all too well. Although this time it might be the real-deal – suggesting another world war may be on the horizon.

Unsurprisingly, the mainstream media has given more sensationalized emphasis to the Russian sphere of things; incessantly highlighting the Russian mobilization, especially with the naval movements through the channel; as an unprovoked threat to the West, the reality is much more lateral than that.

NATO’s creeping ‘Eastern Front’

In November 2015, the Western-leaning leaders of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Poland and Slovakia called for an increased NATO presence in Eastern Europe and the Baltic.

NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg said:

“These are part of a much bigger shift in our posture in response to the challenges we face. We have tripled the size of the NATO Response Force to 40,000 troops. We have put up a new Spearhead Force at its core — around 5,000 troops ready to move within days and we have set up eight new small headquarters in the eastern part of our alliance to coordinate planning, exercises and reinforcements.”

NATO has been gradually building up its forces in Europe for over a decade, but has recently undertaken a huge increase in its presence in the Baltic region and Eastern Europe. The NATO Response Force (NRF) was originally set up following the Prague summit in 2002 as a multinational force made up of land, air, maritime and Special Operations Forces (SOF) that could deploy quickly.

The build-up comes along with the permanent instalment of the Romanian based ‘Aegis’ missile defence system, allegedly placed to protect from short to medium range missiles, particularly from the middle east; a claim thoroughly refuted by Russia as misinformation.

• The US is believed to have spent $800m (£554m) on the site in Romania, where work began in 2013.
• Another phase of the project will be launched in Poland with a groundbreaking ceremony at Redzikowo, near the Baltic Sea. Aegis missiles are to become operational there in 2018.
• NATO build-up in what has been dubbed a ‘military exercise’ will take place reaching into 2017; the UK is committing 800 troops, drones and tanks to Estonia.
  Stephen F. Cohen said in his recent interview with John Batchelor on The John Batchelor Show radio news magazine.

“This military build-up on Russia’s Western frontiers is absolutely unprecedented. There has never been such an amassing of hostile military force on Russia’s Western frontiers since June 1941 when Hitler invaded the Soviet Union and that’s the way the Russians see it”

Mr Cohen went on to say…

“We need to understand that tens of thousands of western troops will be parked now permanently, they may say that they are rotating, but they are there permanently on Russia’s borders. Along with nuclear-ready missiles, along with a lot of tanks and, above all, in Russia’s eyes, the missile ‘defence’ installation”

US Defence Secretary Ashton Carter was questioned regarding the mass-mobilisation:

“When asked to explain why there is this massive NATO mobilization on Russia’s western frontiers, he said because of “Putin’s aggression. That was the only answer,” the professor says.

The Kremlin is responding with due equal measure to maintain the balance of power that Putin holds so dear:

• Russia has pulled out of several nuclear disarmament agreements, including a plutonium restriction agreement aimed at devolving nuclear armaments.
• Newly Kaliningrad-stationed Iskander-M cruise missiles can hit targets across Poland and the Baltics. The US-funded ‘missile defence’ deployment in Poland is perhaps an exact mirroring of this.

NATO and Russia are mirroring each other militarily: the new Arms Race?

The renewed need for a nuclear deterrent has become a pressing issue as Putin’s investiture in military technology is dwarfed by the US arms budget.

Russia reveals photos of a new highly advanced liquid fuelled heavy ICBM capable of evading anti-missile defences and hitting US territory with 10 tonne nuclear payload.

The prospective strategic missile system is being developed in order to assuredly and effectively fulfil objectives of nuclear deterrent by Russia’s strategic forces.

The Makeyev Design Bureau – the designer of Russia’s heavy liquid fuelled Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (“ICBMs”) – i.e. of missiles capable of reaching US territory from Russian territory, has published the first picture of Russia’s new heavy Sarmat ICBM which is due to enter service shortly, probably in 2018.

The plot thickens as NATO think tank predicts Russian Baltic assault would be disastrous for the NATO Alliance.

A top think tank working in the ranks of NATO has predicted that a full-blown Russian assault, outnumbering NATO battalions 2 to 1, and possessing much heavier weaponry than the Baltic states; combined with the Baltics being some of the most geo-politically vulnerable states of NATO – would result in their capitals falling in as little as 36 hours from the start of hostilities.

“As presently postured, NATO cannot successfully defend the territory of its most exposed members”

It is no surprise then that NATO is actively reinforcing these weakest points – military build up in Baltic and Estonian regions mirrors the obviousness that northern Europe is a soft spot that Russia will very likely exploit given a conflict does emerge in form of hot warfare.

Ex-Satellite States are political ‘Swing States’ 

The post-soviet satellite states have little Western military infrastructure, due to the contentiousness surrounding the East-West allegiances and deals that have kept these states fraught in a mode of limbo. The result is a sort of no mans land, teetering on the political fence – vacuums for Russian (or NATO) influence, Ukraine is a perfect example of where NATO backed rebels attempted to oust Russian leaning nationalists, the result was the taking of Crimea and an ongoing civil conflict.

The weak regions where Russia is expected to trample undermanned and thinly armed NATO positions.

NATO Multi-faceted Response:

• Establishment of Polish missile Shield (Second leg of Aegis) to match Russian missiles in Kaliningrad (Russian European inland territory).
• Commitment of more NATO troops and resources to north-eastern europe.
• Stationing of US fleet in Baltic sea.
• More sanctioning of Russian economy.

What is destined to happen is anyone’s guess, but the likelihood is poised towards the establishment of a conflict that will run deeper than the entirety of the cold war era, this is chapter two of the cold war – will it be the last for humankind?

 

 

 

 

Culture Clash: It’s Engineered

High ranking Freemason, Albert Pike wrote in his infamous book ‘Morals & Dogma’ about how the global elites intend to clash the major cultures of faith (Christians/Jews with Islam) in order to bring about one with no faith except praise of the state. This is all tied into the pursuit of a communist world order. By destroying the ‘Opiate’ (religion/faith), you can generate a cultureless superstate that has no faith, and so will worship the state (Satan’s dominion), the next realm in line after God’s.

The principles of abrahamic faith, especially Christianity and Judaism, generally value a strong form of liberty that encourages its adherents to question the state’s every move, and analyze laws according to the Bible; and to never follow laws if they defy the holy written instruction.

It does not matter whether you are religious or not, it is a fact that the holy scriptures help hugely to uphold decent morality, liberty, individual freedoms and encourages its followers to obey this basis over any corruptible law made by man; laws which always change to favour greed and self-service in many cases, as seen throughout history. The Bible and its accompanying faith is the safeguard against total tyranny. In Nazi Germany not too long ago, youths were indoctrinated to praise Adolf Hitler as some God, it worked, and the nation fell into darkness and fascism – now imagine that but on a global level, the current controllers have the levers to global power nearly fully secured, all they need is the right disaster to make everything fall into place.

We must distinguish between men not following these Biblical instructions and killing people at the behest of the orders of another man, and the people that actually follow the instructions, word for word. The elites want us to believe that religion is all bundled into one, and the actions of its adherents define what their respective faith means fundamentally, which it simply does not. They want a conflict so exhaustive that people will leave behind faith and embrace the saviours, who engineered it all, the elite world government which will be branded as our great unifier, the saviour.

By igniting a conflict of major proportions between the faiths, perhaps even one of world-war scale devastation; the aftermath from such chaos can the elites pass legislation, with massive popular support, to outlaw all faith indefinitely. This comes from the ‘new world order’ term, ‘Order out of chaos’ – their guiding principle and modus operandi (mode of operation), you create a problem and create a solution which is a change that you wanted before any problem existed; but would not have been supported due to the absence of any problem.

Make the Muslims hate Christians/Jews by bombing
their nations, make the Christians hate the Muslims by showing us these staged
beheadings and bombings, then bring a bunch of them here, Europe and the West. (the areas they want to subjugate and control).

The Migrant Crisis

For a long time, I’m talking hundreds of years back, have the elites been planning to use Islam to destabilize and overthrow all liberty-loving abrahamic faiths, and put the final nail in the coffin towards ushering in a  ‘New World Order’ – replete with a single government, language, currency, army, religion (statist/satanism). This is done by the use false pretenses to bomb the middle east by forming and funding fake terror groups (all proven to be CIA trained) such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS (Daesh), even using self-inflicted ‘terrorist’ attacks such as 9/11 to rally public support to get into the middle-east, dehumanize the Islamic locals, and wreak havoc and expand the western colony of Israel (Jewish/Christian) and support this colony in its persecution of Palestine – such violent persecution by a western colony is seen across the middle east and paints the entire west poorly, this will anger the local Muslims and put a target on who they need to despise. The carpet bombing of near-eastern cities also leaves the local populaces bereaving, homeless and enraged by the ‘collateral’ damage of US airstrikes, a constant presence of US/NATO military personnel further helps to instill a sense of constant occupational colonialism.

You must understand there was no reason for going to war in Iraq, but the entire West was tricked into thinking it was because ‘evil muslims had nukes’ – yet when the US and NATO barraged into Iraq we have locals who have not seen the same information as those in the West and assume it is hellbent imperialism, their social circles will now paint the west as terrorists, and in the west our media paints them as terrorists. This is the ruse being used to divide and conquer us.

Then, by opening the border floodgates and tempting as many near-east and north-African Islamic migrants into Europe and the West as possible, coupled with ‘terrorist’ attacks that are always ‘Islamic’ – can the elites put two opposite cultures and faiths that dislike each-other into close proximity, the result is that you can destroy the undesirable ’cause’ of all this, the faiths.

It is a free-for-all by design, they will let anyone in now – it is all a part of the destabilization grand plan to destroy western liberty and induce a godless, communist world government run by slaves and a significantly decreased world population of around 300 million.

Albert Pike’s Letters

The following is taken from an anonymous interpretation of Albert Pike’s letters, I encourage you to make your own conclusions, Albert Pike was part of an organization founded on deception to conceal its true motives from the under-initiated.

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”.

The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry.

---

World War I . . . 

Pike’s letter to Mazzini states:

The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the “agentur” (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

Mission accomplished. World War I started in August of 1914. By the end of October 1916, Russia had lost between 1,600,000 and 1,800,000 soldiers, with an additional 2,000,000 prisoners of war and 1,000,000 missing, all making up a total of nearly 5,000,000 men lost.

These staggering losses played a definite role in preparing the Russian Revolution. During that Revolution, Russian Emperor Nicholas II, a Christian, abdicated following the Bolshevik communist Revolution of 1917. Nicholas II, his wife, his son, his four daughters, the family’s medical doctor, the Emperor’s footman, the Empress’ maidservant, and the family’s cook were executed in the same room by the Bolsheviks on the night of 16/17 of July 1918.

Christianity and all religions were then banned in the Soviet Union. Approximately 61,911,000 people, 54,769,000 of them citizens, were murdered by the Communist Party from 1917 to 1987.

World War I also resulted in the League of Nations, the failed predecessor of world government under the United Nations.

It must be noted that President Woodrow Wilson provided Leon Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to “carry forward” the revolution, while Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution as documented by Professor Antony Sutton.

The United States entered World War I based on the sinking of the USS Lusitania false flag operation, where nearly 1200 civilians were massacred to justify war on another continent.

Approximately 11,016,000 individuals were slaughtered during World War I.

World War II

Pike’s letter states:

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.

Mission accomplished. The German people and Nazism lost World War II while top Nazis Occultists,including Hitler who’s so-called skull was that of a woman, escaped to South America or the United States under Operation Paperclip.

World government was formed as the United Nations, which sits on land donated by the masters of usury known as the Rockefeller family. The UN represents the end of national sovereignty and is the institution that globalist bankers use to enslave mankind with carbon taxes, gun control, IMF financing schemes, and created crisis and scarcity of resources.

The Rothschild’s State of Israel was also established to create a permanent strategy of tension that the elites can use to justify trillions of military spending while the human population descends deeper into poverty.

After World War II, the Cold War began. Communism (the Soviet Union) was made strong enough to balance Christendom (Western Civilization) in a Hegelian dialectic of thesis vs. antithesis and Pike hopes the eventual synthesis will be Satanism. The Cold War was also useful in justifying insane military expenditures and nuclear weapon proliferation to a public preoccupied with entertainment.

Approximately 59,028,000 people were slaughtered during World War II.

World War III

An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!

Pike’s letter states:

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion …We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.

One could argue that the Third World War started with the Arab-Israeli War of 1948 over the UN Partition plan of land. Of course, Israel and its neighbors have had weekly or monthly conflicts since then, many of which bordering on short wars like the Six Day War. Thus, the Moslem Arabic World and political Zionism are fighting each other as Pike hoped they would.

One could argue that in addition to supporting Israeli Zionists, the U.S. entered World War III in 1951 with Operation Ajax, a covert operation by the US and British intelligence agencies in the early 1950s to topple Iran’s first democratically-elected government and replace it with a dictatorship. The operation included false-flag terror that resulted in the deaths of some 300 people.

World War III escalated when the United States funded and/or supplied both sides of the Iran/Iraq war and through silence endorsed Saddam Hussein’s slaughter of the Kurds. It is estimated that up to 1,377,000 people were killed in the war.

World War III was further escalated by the Fist Gulf War, essentially fought over oil revenues. Let us not forget the Highway of Death in which retreating Iraqi soldiers and civilians were massacred by U.S./Coalition airpower like shooting fish in a barrel. The bodies were never counted.

In the Second Gulf War, the United States attacked Iraq under the false pretenses that Saddam Hussein had connections to Pentagon asset Al-Qaeda and/or was developing weapons of mass destruction to use against Americans. Some estimates state that over one million Iraqi deaths were caused by U.S occupation of Iraq not to mention over a trillion dollars paid to the military industrial complex.

The war escalated further when on July 3, 1988, Flight 655, an Iranian passenger airliner was shot down over the Strait of Hormuz by the US Navy, killing all 290 civilians aboard. In 2000, The U.S. warship’s commander, William C. Rogers III, was given the Legion of Merit by George Bush, Sr. for his “service as a commanding officer.”

Well before 9/11, Samuel Huntington and the Council on Foreign Relations were predicting that there would be a great clash of civilizations. Or maybe they were following Pike’s letter.

However, it was the 9/11 false flag terrorist attacks that awakened many to World War III. Most Americans believe the absurd official conspiracy theory and therefore support political Zionism against the perceived threat of Muslim extremists. The majority fails to realize that Al-Qaeda is made in the U.S.A. and run by the Pentagon.

World War III is also a covert war, where Western intelligence agencies overthrow democratically elected leaders who refuse to enslave their citizens in debt or lick the boot of the New World Order. The Arab Spring and overthrow of Syria, Libya and Iran was planned long ago in The Brookings Institution’s Which Path to Persia?

On October 3, 2007, years before the U.S. funded Arab Spring of December 2010, General Wesley Clark told the world that seven countries would be overthrown in five years.

Like Al-Qaeda, the U.S. has created the North Korea bogeyman to keep Americans fearful and as an option to provoke World War III.

The mainstream media is reporting that North Korea is testing nuclear weapons and has threatened the U.S. and South Korean forces with “miserable destruction.” A CBS headline reads “North Korea Vows Nuclear Strike Against U.S. “ Yet, the American media refuses to report that the U.S. military provides equipment to North Korea using secret flights.

Or maybe the Third World War will feature the U.S. fighting communist China. Of Course, China is only a world power because Rockefeller, Nixon and Kissinger provided every incentive for U.S. manufacturers to relocate there in a grand act of treason.

As David Rockefeller (Chase Bank, CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group) said:

Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution [nearly 40 million people murdered by democide], it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.

It looks like we are being set up again. Just as Anwar Al-Awlaki, Al-Qaeda’s number two leader, was a special guest of military brass at the Pentagon within months after the Sept. 11, 2001, false flag attacks, a Chinese general who once threatened to use nuclear weapons against hundreds of U.S. cities will visit the Pentagon this week as part of a U.S.-China military exchange program.

World War III has already begun and there is every indication that it will continue to escalate into the “formidable social cataclysm” that Pike planned to usher in Lucifer’s world government.

What Pike Didn’t Tell Us

Albert Pike’s letter calling for three world wars didn’t state that the New World Order should confiscate guns, create a police state and eliminate political dissidents in a United States holocaust. It should be noted that much to the New World Order’s dismay, U.S. troops won’t commit treason so foreign troops and drone warfare will be required.

During the last year the Department of Homeland Security has ordered 2 billion rounds, enough ammunition to fight the Iraq war for thirty years. However, DHS ammo is not used for war; it is to be used domestically. The majority of the ammo purchased by the DHS are hollow point bullets (one order alone amounted to 450 million of them), which are completely unsuitable for training purposes because they cost significantly more money compared to standard firing range bullets.

In addition to the ammo, the DHS paid $2 million dollars to a company that makes shooting targets that include images of children, pregnant women and elderly gun owners in residential settings.

While the Obama and the NWO are try to pass gun control/confiscation legislation, the DHS purchased 7,000 full-auto assault rifles to be used inside the United States, calling them “personal defense weapons” that could be used in urban warfare.

The DHS has also retrofitted 2,717 “Navistar Defense” armored vehicles (light tanks) for service on the streets of America.

The Obama Administration has also published a memo that puts forth a “legal justification” for the President to order the drone assassination of any American citizen he names. Maybe the treat of drone attack will be used to fill the FEMA camps.

Like a U.S. Army document that outlines plans for prisoners, including U.S. citizens, to be re-educated in detention camps, it’s worth reminding ourselves of the fact that Barack Obama’s political mentor, Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, once called for precisely the same thing. When Ayers was asked what he would do with Americans that refused to convert to communism, he said that 25 million Americans would be “eliminated” in concentration camps.

Perhaps a civil war within the United States will begin with economic collapse and an attempted gun confiscation. With the economy in shambles and the stock market recently reaching an all-time high, the globalists appear to be ready to wipe out the wealth of the middle class like they did in the Great Depression.

Any American with a knowledge of history will refuse to be disarmed as that quickly leads to democide.

Turkey may close Syria border

It seems as though ever since the Turkey-Russia bond had been replenished with diplomatic rapprochement following the foiled coup d’etat, which unearthed the US as the eminent saboteurs, the betrayed, but intact, Erdogan-headed Turkish state has honoured Russian requests on a spree of undoing some of the entanglement of NATO & EU agendas; closing the Turkey-Syria border is just another significant example of this reversion in action.

During the negotiations between Moscow and Ankara, Russian diplomats and military demanded to close the Turkish-Syrian border, the Izvestiya newspaper reported, citing Russian members of parliament and its own sources.

Stemming the migrants, decimating ISIS

“Let’s fight against the terrorist group together, so that we can clear it out as soon as possible.” This begins with crushing the US-Saudi supply lines that ISIS thrives upon.

The proposition comes after Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Vladimir Putin this week to “restart dialogue and restart relations”

These are the things that will favour Russia and the East, and hamper the cultural-Marxist, Western Zionist powers that be;

• Stemming the migrants keeps the West from cultural dilution, and maintains the biblical, traditionalist roots of Europe; an identity of the people aligns with the identity of long held values that conserve that given culture (in the case of the West, the culture of liberty) –  yet too much liberty destroys this, and threatens to debase the balance, it cuckolds western culture to be replaced by Islamic culture; a culture far more controllable by the tyrants in the high places due to its sheer disregard of individual liberty. Elites deep behind the world leaders feed off this negligence, from a vestige known as the ‘invisible government’ or ‘shadow government.’

Peoples all over the world, claims Putin, are supporting Russia`s “defense of traditional values” against a “so-called tolerance” that is “genderless and infertile.” as propagated by a liberal mindset that is so tolerant, it tolerates the intolerant, and seldom tolerates the reasonable who tolerate the tolerant.

While western culture is not perfect, its subversion through liberal propaganda to replace it with a worse culture (Islamic), is not a positive replacement.

“Naturally, we raised the issue of closing the Syrian-Turkish border to stop the flow of terrorists and weapons. In this way, militants would lose any kind of replenishment supply from the outside,” Deputy Head of the Defense Committee of the State Duma, Victor Vodolatsky, noted.

Putin attacked “attempts to enforce more progressive development models” on other nations, which have led to “decline, barbarity and big blood.” Easily observable in the concession of European borders to un-screened foreign unknowns; allowing a rape epidemic, crime spikes, a rise in terrorism, and cultural discord.

• Fully decimating ISIS and its direct supply lines makes sure the Western puppet masters have little excuse to perpetuate the ‘migrant’ crisis any further; so that the EU might collapse before the pro-EU migrants can vote it into eternity, and that ‘liberal’ trans-nationalism will fall with it; third world cultures being the very bane of western liberty.

Russia is especially keen to extend the hand of friendship to Turkey regarding the ongoing conflict in Syria, in which the Kremlin has intervened militarily to safeguard Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Putin needs a win in Syria – and an escape route. To that end, he needs to move Erdogan, who had been, by order of the West, supplying arms and support to the Sunni rebels whom the Russian air force has been hunting. So, with Turkey pivoted to the Kremlin things are now looking a bit different.

 

 

Russia mass-constructing Churches

Russia Builds 5000 Churches, adds 10,000 Clergy in Six Years

“There could not be such growth in the Church if there were no demand. That is why we feel so special when we place the foundations of new churches…”

The Orthodox faith, in concomitant partnership with the Russian State has constructed a hefty multitude of religious communities across the last six years, propelled by what is described as high demand. But could this be a sign of a flourishing Church, or maybe a protective measure against rising Islamic cultural-Marxism, as the floodgates of Europe are lifted?

With a rising percentage of Islamic adherents (6.5%) among the Russian populace, the need for the state to suppress the volatility of cultural Islam, as paralleled in the suffocating West, has never been of greater importance. The 41% of Russian Orthodoxy is under an emerging threat of decline as atheistic, liberal western culture leaks into the country, coupled with a gradually rising growth of conservative cultural Islam, poised to take the hot seat within decades.

The Polarization of the Cultures

The rampant proselytizing, high birth-rate, third world Islamic families spread Islam; a sociopolitical, religious ideology with extremist overtones at an incredible rate once comfortably established in the womb of a western state.

The very presence of the highly disciplinary cultural Islam will overwhelm the other faiths and cultures in the new country within mere decades, as the forced inter-generational principles of Islam are generally more stringently passed on in near-east, conservative Muslim families that are actually often very skeptical of marriage into western circles, not comparable to the (engineered to be) highly, highly liberal west. This cultural polarization has been engineered well and truly.

This multicultural approach, saying that we simply live side by side and live happily with each other has failed. Utterly failed. – Angela Merkel – while Merkel is not wrong in this instance, it is more a case of failure to integrate migrants than an implicit failure to live together, we haven’t taken steps to expect Muslims to integrate and start to assimilate, so we’ve got what we asked for.

These are families with high birth rates and a high tendency to form ethnic enclaves once deployed in a Western environment with other migrants, unable to speak the native language, by and large preventing any morsels of ‘outside’ influence for cultural acclimatization; it is a phenomenal recipe for regressive non-western Islam to become the dominant faith, culture and political system in western countries that knowingly allow all of this to occur, with mass migration exempt of sensibility for vetting the newcomers, and being more discerning of letting the floodgates open so easily.

• Islamic migrants will vote for more welfare and ‘free stuff’ – so will blindly vote for the socialist West. They do not tend to care about liberties, western culture or constitutionalism due to their deprived backgrounds that had none of these things. Which makes sense, but understand that their inclination to their formative ways are being taken advantage of for political reasons.
• 1st generation Islamic migrants are being brought in (on a permanent basis more than not, in the UK housing is going up for them) without knowledge of their new surroundings, often without speaking the native language either. This forms ethnic enclaves and preserves non-integrated bubble communities that will grow rapidly (high birth rate)and take over urban centers, (white flight, natives have little in common culturally) and so on – because of these mono-ethnic communities that aren’t able to integrate adequately, a strong desire is formed in these growing, unchanged communities for Islamic traditions and customs, even schools and laws are sprouting up to emulate the third world countries they came from.
• Islamic cultural Marxism in Europe and the West will estrange Russia and China as cultural outcasts, allowing for harsher foreign policies against them – as a predominantly third-world Islamic culture will allow this by popular, majority support using the ‘brilliant’ system of democracy we know as mob rule, and western liberals will concede more and more for the sake of not ‘offending’ and Muslims. I mean, just look at how extensive margins of current ‘western’ Muslims claim that their western countries should have the oppressive, highly Islamic Shariah law, many are not kind towards denominational, multifaceted societies, at all. Yet the liberals think it is racist to even bring this up as an issue, third-world migrants more than not, couldn’t care less about acceptance and lovey-dovey cooperation, they’re here to better their lives and keep their oppressive, pushy customs as well.

The high birth rate of the third and second worlds will spread their associated Islamic culture faster than western values will be able to be spread (and sustained) in the painfully low birth rate, 1st world west. It’s simple arithmetic that third world, cultural Islam will always override western culture based on these pretenses.

Observe the below statistics showing how third world migrants are far more entrenched in the anti-western lifestyle and mindset of cultural Islam, whereas those already in the West are much more moderate, but still not ideal. Does it make sense, therefore, to not import migrants to the west in such great quantities? Especially in the knowledge that they are from a background where a strong Islamic culture (that is not western in the slightest) is actively promoted, pluralism only works if everyone can respect common liberties and the notion of the individual, something utterly bereft in many oppressed third-world Muslim families.

It is easy to see that third world culture is far more extreme, and far more illiberal then western culture. Don’t get this twisted with ‘all cultures are equal’ – because they’re all different, some for the worse, some for the better.

Everyone is equal in soul, but in way of choice in spiritual and self-governmental matters; that is liable to differentiation, something that the ‘liberal’ west ignores.

These geopolitical effects are exactly what Putin has rooted out as detrimental, and contrary to his country’s values, Putin knows the elites in the West want these climatic outcomes, and are using a mass ‘migrant’ crisis to engineer their grand plan, a plan that will get rid of the liberty propagating Bible, and bring in the repressive control system promoted by the commandments in the Qu’ran.

This explains the recent moves to rapidly expand (and cement) the Orthodox faith in Russia, no doubt to sustain its dominance as the state religion, and the stern statements from Putin claiming cultural-Marxism, and intolerant cultures that seek to bend the established state culture to their template have no place in his country.

Putin knows that a majority Islam Europe and a majority Islam Russia will try to merge by popular demand – it will lead him into the clutches of the West and diminish his leadership, this is a prospect of severe civil unrest that Putin is not prepared to cede. He absolutely must hold onto Russian customs and ways, as China has similarly done by banning Islamic migrants.

 

Russia and Turkey are warming up

In an epoch of NATO imperialism, Putin’s allying with China, and recent warm gestures towards Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggests an ever closer need for diplomatic friends is firmly on the Russian agenda, something unimaginable given the blaring western coverage of a Turkish shoot-down of a Russian jet, Western MSM packaged it all as an alleged sealer of Russian-Turkish enmity

Washington attempted to depose Erdoğan.

Washington’s sordid reluctance to hand over Erdogan’s political foe, Fethullah Gülen is a red flag in itself that US special intelligence needed Gülen to sow dissent, and perhaps even plant in place of Erdogan given a US-backed Gülenist coup were successful; which it simply was not.

Source – Erdogan accuses Washington of conspiring against him.

• The rumours the coup failed because of a Russian tip-off are almost certainly true.

The Jet aggravation incident has turned out to be an insider orchestration by a rogue member of the military seeking to sow long-lasting dissent between the Russians and Turks, this was rumored to be a member of the same subordinate Turkish military fragment that was allegedly paid and provided for by US-Western coordinated special intelligence to oust Erdogan in last months’ attempted coup.

…a coup that the presiding Turkish state was prepared for; mainly due to Russian intelligence likely tipping off Erdogan at the last minute, allowing for him to escape prosecution and probable execution, and ultimately remain in power.

This is something the Turkish President has not forgotten, and is now actively rewarding in recent, significant diplomatic gestures of gratitude to Mr. Putin and his affiliates in the best interests of amending the divisions once carved by NATO.

• A pro-coup officer captured by the Turkish government, Lieutenant Colonel Murat Bolat, told the conservative Yeni Savak newspaper that his unit was designated to detain and possibly murder Erdogan after receiving precise information on Erdogan’s location from US sources.

MOSCOW — Against a backdrop of rising tensions between Turkey and the West, Presidents Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey pledged on Tuesday to repair relations after nine months of open antagonism.

“The alliance will alter the global chessboard in a way that eviscerates the imperial plan to control the flow of energy from Qatar to Europe, redraw the map of the Middle East and pivot to Asia.  …  The July 15 coup is likely the final nail in the NWO coffin …”

This rocky road of diplomatic limbo has seen the US wrestle for control over the Anatolian peninsula across the preceding months, but only now have the Western Zionist neocons let slip an ally that will make or break some of their utmost nefarious dealings; namely in suppressing Greater Eurasia’s breathing space, the inane mass-migration policies, and the funding & facilitation of ISIS. All through this vital proxy state, Turkey.

Oil and Gas

Russia and Turkey are fast-tracked to normalize relations. In President Erdogan’s first trip outside of Turkey since the coup attempt, the Turkish President chose to visit Russia in what is sure to deeply anger his NATO partners; the very ‘partners’ that most likely attempted to depose him in the recently failed coup.

What is even worse for the US-NATO camp is that Erdogan now surely knows of this probable (and shoddy) conspiratorial plot to replace him, his recent moves to consolidate power by purging the Turkish military, and omitting political and legal ‘undesirables’ prove that a helping hand (likely Russian) has provided guidance against funded opposition, ensuring his statesmanship continues in due course – and in the best interests of the Eastern world.

Some pipelines illustrating the geopolitical importance of Syria and Turkey, both now increasingly under the Russian sphere of influence.

The advantages of Turkey and Russia realigning themselves will give a huge boost to the Russian oil and gas pipelines, as well as give Erdogan access to the best of both worlds. As seen below, Turkey is a crucial, central landmass in the effective, cost-efficient transportation of Russian oil and gas, being the ‘crossroads of the world’ Turkey is truly a hotspot for the geopolitical clashes of the superpowers vying for global influence.

Just look at how important Ukraine is for the Russians (Ukraine targeted by West), by restoring relations with Turkey (Also targeted by the West), Putin is able to get his resources into Europe as cheaply as possible, and without the sanctions of yore.

The proposed pipelines below, such as TANAP (Trans Anatolian Pipeline Project) and TAP (Trans Adriatic Pipeline) will be instantaneous solutions to the obtrusive US-fomented Ukraine crisis blocking Russian oil and gas to Europe on already established infrastructure; Europe being one of Russia’s biggest economic markets for resource trading. And finally, Putin will cut loose the noose that has held the Russian Federation in a state of economic uncertainty for so long, enabling bridge-building back into the European continent to become viable once again.

The ‘Turkish Stream’ pipeline will also be a revived project now the diplomatic pivot is in motion for Turkey to begin turning a cold shoulder to NATO and the EU, and approach the Greater Eurasian Union for deals.

• The $10 billion TANAP pipeline is expected to transport gas of Azerbaijan’s Shah Deniz field from the Georgian-Turkish border to the western border of Turkey. The gas will be delivered to Turkey in 2018, and after completion of the Trans Adriatic Pipeline’s (TAP) construction, the gas will be delivered to Europe in early 2020

It is clear to see why Putin seized Crimea in 2014 on the basis of sustaining the Black Sea pipeline to Romania (AGRI); if Ukraine had been taken by a Western leaning government, the Black Sea pipeline would have likely been disallowed. So by seizing Crimea you keep control over the pipeline’s waters by force and, by allying with Turkey you guarantee an alternative pipeline safeguard in case you lose in Ukraine; it gives Putin solid options against potential western-incurred economic collapse.

As stated, with a consolidated alliance between Russia and Turkey in the bag, Putin can keep Europe opened up to him, and prevent any further insular, exclusive anglicization that would shut him out in the cold economically and socially. Keeping Turkey sovereign over its own politics and away from the prospective bureaucracy of Brussels will prove essential in preventing a transnational, Western leaning EU from absorbing the Turkish state, and forming an inwards looking bloc-fortress that claims to promulgate ‘unity’ – but really only intends to be a bulwark of protectionist, western proxy-imperialism against the Eastern superstates.

With Turkey and the Black Sea reined-in, Putin can refocus his infrastructure for resource transportation in another region, and break away from the sinkhole instabilities in Ukraine, lightening the load against him considerably.

I assume that Russia will first try to regain favour with Ukraine and reinstate a Russian leaning government, if this fails, Putin will have held off long enough to have constructed another few oil lines through Anatolia, giving him the ability to cede the Ukraine issue without bogging himself down in desperation to maintain a once solely crucial link, and then enable ‘repaired’ relations with the West by getting sanctions lifted and playing nice.

Turkey has left the fray, but NATO pushes on.

Influence in Turkey allows Putin to have a loyal middleman, and a membrane state to keep his resources flowing into Europe; not a vehemently anti-Russian wall (which NATO wants) on the extremity of the trading gold mine that is Europe. This Turkish-Russian friendship is a huge blow for NATO and the oligarchical, elitist West, because it means Russia has once again wheedled its way back into the European market that the EU has long sought to exclude and isolate Russia, it gives Putin a foot in the door in regards to keeping his trading relevance vitalized, especially after the difficulties in Ukraine which may preclude Russian oil and gas from getting into Europe and have served to isolate Russia, establishing new links will give Putin the ability to loosen the vice on Ukraine, and restore scarred reputation.

Russia under siege: depends on oil and gas

• In 2015, the figure for oil making up Russia’s federal budget revenues reached 44 percent. This makes oil a top weak spot for the Globalists to strike, huge western think tanks produce the strategy, the elites give the go ahead.
• Russia produced an average of 10.83 million barrels (1,722,000 m³) of oil per day in December 2015. It produces 12% of the world’s oil and has a same share in global oil exports.

The Gulf states, working with the Globalist Zionists in the USA drove oil value into the ground to sever the oil-reliant Russian economy.

As cheap oil weakens the Russian economy, it also causes its national currency, the ruble, to depreciate. That means Russian consumers have to shell out more rubles if they want to maintain their consumption levels, raising civil unrest.

Russia’s economy declined 3.7 percent in 2015, the deepest contraction since 2009, and may shrink a further 0.5 percent this year (2016).

Geopolitical tensions have added to the Russian ruble’s weakness. The currency has nearly halved in value since Putin’s annexation of Crimea in March 2014 and the U.S. and the European Union imposed sanctions against Russia

The ruble, now the world’s worst performing currency: Russia is under a financial siege that Putin and compatriots must outmaneuver.

These methods, among others, come together with why the West is targeting Putin’s ability to export oil (and gas) in all sorts of methods, as well as engineering chaos by crushing oil’s global value in last year’s huge devaluation, making the oil-dependent Russia suffer by expanding the deficit and spurring inflation, prompting spending cuts and other austerity measures as detailed above. The West want to destroy Russia from inside to out, and then perhaps initiate something unthinkable when the time is right; but pelleting the Russians to soften them up from afar is the tactic currently being employed.

Turkey has now left behind its days of funding ISIS and collaborating with the twisted West, and has offered Putin its assistance against the Islamic State.

In keeping Erdogan afloat, Putin is humbling the sprawling, complacent empire of NATO, cleverly buying himself time to solve the Ukraine issues, and adequately square up against western-led hostility without crippling his economy. No wonder western media continually paints him as an eminent threat to justify to the public its provocative, backdoor-led encroaching behavior on all aspects of the Russian state, Putin is a certainly a threat – to Globalism.

• The recent targeting of Russian Olympic athletes in a ‘doping scandal’ is one example of the how the West wants to demonize Russia in the eyes of the common man, smoothing the way for heightened NATO involvement.
• The Russian/English fans fighting during the Euro 2016 football tournament is another orchestrated propaganda surge against Putin, and arguably against the recently Brexited UK.

As a small point, a bit out of the scope of this article: Putin’s moves to solidify a ‘Greater Eurasian’ union with China to rival the European Union that seeks to incur his demise is also an example of the strategies Putin is employing to make sure Russia is not starved by a US dominated world economy; a world economy that is now rapidly shifting into an Asian dominated era as the US fiat currency funded empire begins to crumble. The death throes of this empire being a woeful  last ditch attempt to take out the superstates that threaten to replace it, as seen in recent NATO aggression; when something is cornered or threatened, that is when it will fight hardest.

Other economic points:

• There is talk of a free trade agreement with the Eurasian Economic Union for Turkey, favours Russia.
• The Turk Stream gas pipeline project will surely be revived. Favours Russia.
• Turkey could move closer towards some of the Eurasian institutions that are being created such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (in which it already has observer status) and the Eurasian Economic Union, and it might even take some initial steps towards joining them. Favours Russia.

Western Bias: Just looking at how the hellbent West selectively projects its terrible flaws (rigged democracy) onto Russia and China, proves in itself the egregious biases littering our media sources and the permeating brainwashing schemes that are currently afoot, beware.

I believe that Putin knows that by re-establishing his infrastructure across Anatolia he can defuse the Ukraine crisis allowing for a lift in the sanctions against him, this alleviation of sanctions must happen as the Globalists do not want to be openly appearing as anti-Russian warmongers to the world. Ukraine is nothing more than a Western funded ‘moderate’ rebel proxy provocation to pressure Putin into making himself look bad by annexing Crimea, as to provoke the following desired outcomes…

• waste Russia’s precious money (and weaken its economy) on an increasingly cautionary, unnecessary defense budget to keep an appearance of toughness,
• to instigate a tearaway of previously close Ukraine-Russian relations (something Russia is desperately trying to keep intact),
• to eventually induct Ukraine into the EU empire by demonizing Russia,
• to tarnish international opinion of Russia as corrupt, even when all the superpowers are to some extent,
• to give an excuse for NATO to push up close against Russian borders,
• to block Russian oil and gas exports to Europe through Ukraine.
• to provide an excuse to heavily economically sanction Russia.

Military Advantages, The Black Sea

In May 2016, Erdogan described the Black Sea as ‘almost a Russian lake’ and called for NATO naval reinforcements to be sent to the area. That prompted a response by Russia’s Permanent Representative to NATO Alexander Grushko who said that the Black Sea will never be a ‘NATO lake‘.

Now with the Russians more and more amenably bound to Turkey, Putin can begin to push back the tirade of NATO aggression pressed uncomfortably near to his borders. This begins with gaining more influence over the largely Turkish owned Black Sea waters. Along with seizing Crimea, Putin will now be able to earn the diplomatic grist to keep NATO’s naval provocations out of the Black Sea; especially as Turkey’s view of the belligerent West begins to sour.

With huge NATO ally, Turkey now more or less in Russian hands, the future of NATO’s undue provocations in the Black Sea region is set to come under scrutiny, especially as Turkey may now be prepared to close off or discourage passage through the Istanbul access route to the Black Sea.

As seen in the side images, the annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014 opened up a sizable portion of the Black Sea to come under Russian control; so just imagine what having favour with Turkey will do for Putin’s Black Sea aspirations in peacefully repelling NATO aggression?

The fact that Russia now (as of 2014) controls half of the Black Sea has enraged NATO. Russia wants answers on NATO troop movement in Eastern Europe as the US tries to sneak in troops there while whining about Russian troops inside Russia’s borders. Note that the US is several thousand miles away, while Russia is very much inside its own territory. The real bogeyman is glaringly obvious.

Conclusively, the Turkish pivot towards Russia will probably complicate NATO operations in the Black Sea, and lead to resistance from Turkey to any more anti-Russian posturing by NATO.

---

Ramping up the arsenal

Over the past 24 months the Black Sea has been the focus of Russia’s military modernization programme. As a consequence of the 2-year re-calibration of forces, the Federation has added four submarines, two missile corvettes and several patrol boats to their Black Sea fleet with another two submarines and six frigates expected to join them later this year. Combined with the anti-ship/anti-air installations deployed in occupied Crimea and along Russia’s Black Sea shore, such an A2/AD constellation could pose a substantial challenge should NATO need to provide reinforcements to the Black Sea Allies.

In response, the number of NATO military exercises and drills as well as naval patrols in the Black Sea has been revised up to reflect the more ‘aggressive’ Russian posture. However, additional assurance measures, to be implemented by the Alliance or individual member states, are also under consideration.

Securing the buffer states

The plan to rotate four NATO battalions through Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia has prompted much concern in Moscow, where state officials have voiced suspicion that NATO was preparing for “a global strike” on Russia. Russia in return has vowed to provide a “highly effective” and “asymmetrical” reinforcement.

The gateway states to Europe are Russia’s loyal band, the old guard of ex-cold war buffer states that still (somewhat) answer to Moscow, but NATO is tempting them away, bit by bit; Latvia and Estonia are slowly waning, while Belarus seemingly remains loyal, perhaps with inklings of a desire to maintain neutrality.

Keir Giles, Russian military expert for U.K. think-tank Chatham House, says Minsk is currently engaged in a “process of outreach to find friends other than Russia.”

“But Belarus must be watching warily the development of confrontation between NATO and Russia.”

“One should not forget that the ‘wise calf milks two cows’ tactic is Lukashenko’s trademark so this is all quite familiar for him,” Igor Sutyagin, Russian military expert at the London-based Royal United Services Institute claimed.

Belarus is Russia’s ally in its own security alliance, known as the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and has agreed to set up joint air defense with Russia. The country is also in talks with Moscow about hosting a Russian airbase, in an apparent response to NATO eastern initiatives.

“After Russia’s Putin, Erdogan Will Meet With Belarus’s Lukashenko”

While Belarus remains somewhat steadfast, recently, two AN/MPQ-64F1 Sentinel radar systems were delivered to Russian buffer state, Latvia as part of the United States’ ‘European Reassurance Initiative,’ according to a Tuesday press release by the US Embassy.

This ‘European Reassurance Initiative’ is without a doubt the next ‘Marshall Plan’ in cultivating support for the NATO cohort by means of bribery.

---